QOTD: How Do You Solve a Problem Like Nissan?

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

The news of Nissan’s recent financial trouble brought attention right where it needs to be: on lackluster product. In our most recent reporting regarding Nissan’s sales woes, I was asked in the comments whether I had any ideas for improvement. Well that got me thinking (and worked up), and it turns out I do have ideas, and they fall into three major categories.

Product

First up is a culling of product. Nissan makes too many things that are old/noncompetitive/boring/bad/similar. The following listing covers current models, and pares them down into a new lineup for 2023 or thereabouts:

Versa, Leaf, Sentra, Pulsar

Maxima, Altima

GT-R, 370Z Silvia

Kicks, Rogue Sport, Murano Rogue, Rogue Limited

Pathfinder

Armada

NV200 NV NV3500

Frontier

Titan

In the compact class, Sentra is available in hatchback and sedan, front- and all-wheel drive, and standard, hybrid, and EV versions. There’s a WRX competitor (hatchback only) called Pulsar as a distinct model offering. Maxima goes away, and Altima reaches higher with a Maxima trim. All-wheel drive is available on mid- and Maxima trim Altimas. The outdated and pointless GT-R and 370Z coupes fade away, replaced by the rear-drive, lightweight Silvia. Standard Silvia power is a 2.0t and there’s a Silvia K’s with a 2.5t. The Silvia’s platform is a light one, and is shared with a new Q60. The current FM platform is too heavy, and goes away. Small and midsize CUV action is satisfied by the best-known name, Rogue. Long-wheelbase Rogues are called Rogue Limited, and there’s an optional performance trim, SR. Pathfinder is reworked on a new Altima platform, and is no longer lame (more below). All NV vans are now the 3500, and sold in cargo and passenger versions. There’s nothing wrong with the NV, but there’s no need for too many variants or the Chevrolet NV200. Frontier is new and is the global Navarra, because Nissan knows it makes sense to send a modern truck to a truck-happy market like North America. Titan goes away, as it’s an expensive American-centric product which is a waste of money and will not compete with Toyota or even Honda.

Engineering

CVTs are banished in all but hybrid and EV Nissan offerings. Transmissions across the line include six- and eight-speed standard automatics, as well as a six- or eight-speed DCT for performance models. The VQ is no more, as its paint mixer sound and thirsty nature (3.5 and 4.0) have no place even in 2019. Replacement mills include the 2.0 and 3.0 engine series from Infiniti, with and without turbochargers. Nissan was strangling its volume cars in order to restrict its only good engines to Infiniti, and that was a mistake. NV3500 and Armada use a new 5.7-liter V8, or diesel engines from abroad.

Quality

The new Nissan builds quality cars which drivers (not fleet companies) actually want. Interior components are not sourced from the lowest-quality Mitsubishi supplier. Paint finish is no longer in the orange peel realm. Suspensions are tuned well (like a Nineties Nissan), rather than being excessively harsh for a faux “sporty” effect.

And there’s the basic outline to save Nissan’s hide. At the lower end, Mitsubishi carries the cheap junk for people with bad credit. On the higher end, Infiniti has cars which are not from 2008 or 2012. But those two must be saved another day. How would you save Nissan?

[Images: Nissan, Chris Tonn/TTAC]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 132 comments
  • Akear Akear on Aug 05, 2019

    Nissan can survive by just saying at least we are not as bad as GM. GM has never produced a car as good as either the Altima or Sentra. The Rogue is simply better than any comparable GM vehicle. GM - what a disgrace!

  • Safeblonde Safeblonde on Aug 07, 2019

    I don't think that one dealer's problem should reflect a whole brand's problem, but Nissan St. Charles Illinois (search that...) doesnt help.

  • ToolGuy This thing here is interesting.For example, I can select "Historical" and "EV stock" and "Cars" and "USA" and see how many BEVs and PHEVs were on U.S. roads from 2010 to 2023."EV stock share" is also interesting. Or perhaps you prefer "EV sales share".If you are in the U.S., whatever you do, do not select "World" in the 'Region' dropdown. It might blow your small insular mind. 😉
  • ToolGuy This podcast was pretty interesting. I listened to it this morning, and now I am commenting. Listened to the podcast, now commenting on the podcast. See how this works? LOL.
  • VoGhost If you want this to succeed, enlarge the battery and make the vehicle in Spartanburg so you buyers get the $7,500 discount.
  • Jeff Look at the the 65 and 66 Pontiacs some of the most beautiful and well made Pontiacs. 66 Olds Toronado and 67 Cadillac Eldorado were beautiful as well. Mercury had some really nice looking cars during the 60s as well. The 69 thru 72 Grand Prix were nice along with the first generation of Monte Carlo 70 thru 72. Midsize GM cars were nice as well.The 69s were still good but the cheapening started in 68. Even the 70s GMs were good but fit and finish took a dive especially the interiors with more plastics and more shared interiors.
  • Proud2BUnion I typically recommend that no matter what make or model you purchase used, just assure that is HAS a prior salvage/rebuilt title. Best "Bang for your buck"!
Next