By on May 28, 2014

Renault LG Signing Ceremony

With most EVs getting around 100 miles on a single charge from their battery packs, such vehicles are more suited for the downtown core than a trip to the mountains. However, Renault and LG Chem are looking toward boosting range toward Tesla-like levels, together.

Autoblog Green reports Renault’s CCO Thierry Bolloré and LG Chem’s battery chief Kwon Young-soo signed a memorandum of understanding to develop battery range technology through the use of the latter company’s high-energy-density batteries. LG makes the batteries for EVs and PHEVs, including the Chevrolet Volt, and will supply packs to 20 automakers in 2015, double the business it does currently.

Meanwhile, Renault may use the results of its joint-venture with LG Chem to improve the range — and therefore, potential sales — of its Twingo and other Z.E. EVs. The Twingo was recently shelved in part to less-than-expected demand for the city car, with no word on when the EV will go back on sale.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

9 Comments on “Renault, LG Chem Sign MOU To Develop Long-Range Battery Technology...”


  • avatar
    shaker

    Can’t wait. :-)

  • avatar
    Felix Hoenikker

    The formula for success in the EV market is simple: double the range and halve the cost of the battery pack. Then EVs will become attractive second cars if the price is close to that of a compact ICE car.

    • 0 avatar
      redav

      It will take more than halving the battery cost to have a price “close to that of a compact ICE car.” The simple analysis is that if batteries cost more than an engine, then a compact EV will cost more than a compact ICE car.

      Rather, the threshold to pass is the point where it’s definitively cheaper to buy+fuel+maintain an EV compared to an ICE car. Running a car on electricity is ~1/3 the cost of gasoline, and if maintenance comes out as a significant savings, too, then you might get people to get past the sticker shock. However, I doubt most people think in the long-term, which is why they buy cars based on monthly costs.

  • avatar
    juicy sushi

    Makes sense to deepen this type of relationship. Toyota locked down Panasonic, Renault-Nissan doing same with LG gives them the same opportunity to steal a technical edge on rivals.

    • 0 avatar
      CoreyDL

      The symbol on the right side of the banner is for Samsung, which is one of the leading car brands over there (of course owned by Renault). I think the article should’ve mentioned Samsung as well.

  • avatar
    redav

    I still like the idea presented a while back for using a set of aluminum plates in a consumable galvanic cell to serve as a range extender. It’s lighter than rechargeable batteries, inexpensive (when including the residual value of the consumed battery), and could be quickly swapped at a service center.

  • avatar
    wmba

    Long range battery.

    Surely a case of the misplaced modifier.

    Batteries don’t have range, they have capacity. Larger capacity batteries give longer range in EVs, for those who actually care. Does having a supersized can of beans make them any better tasting than the standard 14 oz can of fartly delights?

    TTAC headlines. Deceiving you since 2011.

  • avatar
    Signal11

    Ugh. Koreans and their MOU signing ceremonies.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: QOTD: Which Manufacturer Has Most Lost Its Way?

    Giltibo - Funny. I drive a 2008 Accord Coupe (K24 5MT) and work with a few people who own 3-series BMWs. At similar mileages (about 140K – 80M), their...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Volvo 240GL Estate

    gzuckier - I see a parallel evolution in the 240, the Checker cab, and the 55/56 Chevies
  • Re: Capsule Review: Volvo 240GL Estate

    gzuckier - the early manuals were a 4 speed with electric OD; not sure when they switched to proper 5 speed. Lots of malfunctioning ODs out there. Typical Volvo fashion,...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Volvo 240GL Estate

    gzuckier - The steel parts are pretty durable; the electricals not so much, on the early models. No worse than most other cars, just that they would be the point of...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Volvo 240GL Estate

    gzuckier - I do not enjoy it in the snow, even with snow tires. Maybe it’s typical of RWD cars in that way; I’ve forgotten the cars of my youth. (Except my...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Volvo 240GL Estate

    gzuckier - Actually, according to the CAT scale at the local truck stop, an 89 240 weighs 2800 plus change, in daily driving around trim. Pretty lightweight,...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Volvo 240GL Estate

    gzuckier - It wasn’t until relatively recently that anybody was killed in a 240 crash in the US. (Don’t know about other countries). Of course, a lot of that...
  • Re: QOTD: Which Manufacturer Has Most Lost Its Way?

    VolandoBajo - If GM takes the tactic of “owning” the vehicle’s operating code, I am going to teach my wife and son to never buy one, ever,...
  • Re: QOTD: Which Manufacturer Has Most Lost Its Way?

    VolandoBajo - GMC is a place to provide a pre-retirement home to what would otherwise be redundant mid to upper level management employees at GM. And a way...
  • Re: QOTD: What’s Your Automotive Guilty Pleasure?

    VolandoBajo - Coincidentally or not, my local Ford dealer’s service department just got in some new super heavy duty lifts for some of their...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, United States
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States