Tesla: $5 an Hour 'Unacceptable', Company Will 'Do Right' by Workers

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Tesla Motors responded quickly to a bombshell exposé on the low-paid foreign workers helping to expand the company’s California assembly plant.

The investigation by the Bay Area News Group, published in The Mercury News, detailed the hundreds of Slovenian and Croatian laborers brought into the Freemont plant on business visas last year to build a paint shop. Paid $5 an hour, safety protocol among the group was lax, work hours were long, and a serious injury ended in a workers’ compensation lawsuit.

Tesla was cleared of any wrongdoing by an accident investigator, but now the company says it has a moral responsibility to stop all unsafe and unfair work practices at its facility.

The workers, including injured Gregor Lesnik, were recruited by ISM Vuzem, a Slovenian subcontractor brought in by Eisenmann, the German company tasked with building Tesla’s paint shop.

Lesnik’s lawsuit saw all three companies deny responsibility for the worker, who fell three stories from the roof of the shop.

“When Mr. Lesnik brought a workers compensation case, Tesla was dismissed from the case because the judge concluded that we had no legal responsibility for what occurred,” the company stated in their response to the growing controversy.

“All of that is fine legally, but there is a larger point. Morally, we need to give Mr. Lesnik the benefit of the doubt and we need to take care of him. We will make sure this happens.”

The company said it plans to work with the contractor and subcontractor in investigating the matter, and will correct all cases of unfair treatment. Tesla said it doesn’t agree with workers coming to its factory under the conditions described in the article, calling the practice of paying laborers $5 an hour “totally unacceptable.”

“Creating a new car company is extremely difficult and fraught with risk, but we will never be a company that by our action does, or by our inaction allows, the wrong thing to happen just to save money,” Tesla stated.

The electric automaker is ramping up the production capacity of its Fremont factory to handle a greater volume of existing models, as well as the upcoming Model 3, which has 400,000 reservations. The timeline for the Model 3 is tight, with production expected to start in late 2017.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 48 comments
  • FOG FOG on May 17, 2016

    I have a very hard time believing that management at Tesla is so mathematically challenged that they couldn't figure out that labor costs didn't add up. I also have trouble believing that the California government didn't know about this and looked the other way because manufacturing facilities don't do well under the watchful eyes of the Nature Nazi's and crazy people.

    • See 1 previous
    • DenverMike DenverMike on May 17, 2016

      @psarhjinian Walmart was caught with illegal alien cleaning-crews, from sub-subcontracting services. It happens a lot, no doubt. The main contractors do what ever it takes to submit the lowest bid, and start shopping for the cheapest subs. What happens after that, they don't know, don't care.

  • Hreardon Hreardon on May 17, 2016

    Anybody who has been involved in a competitive bid situation knows that at the end of the day, the people signing the checks and managing the books will ask this question: "Will the guy bidding at $30,000 versus the guy at $50,000 be able to get the job done to code, within spec, and on time?" If the answer is yes, they'll take the $30,000 bid and never ask another question so long as the paperwork is legit and the client has the ability to sue/claw back/extract their pound of flesh if things go wrong.

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next