Ramming Speed: Meet the 2025 Ram RHO

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

The 2025 Ram 1500 I drove earlier this year no longer offers a TRX model. We knew, however, that Ram wouldn't go long without offering a high-performance trim. Enter the 2025 Ram RHO


We knew this both because it's not very Ram-like to not offer something with plenty of power, and because Ram folks hinted at it during the Ram press launch.

Now we know the details.

The highlights here are the specs. Under the RHO's hood is a 3.0-liter turbocharged Hurricane inline-six cylinder that makes 540 horsepower and 521 lb-ft of torque.

Ram is promising a 0-60 time of 4.6 seconds, with the quarter-mile vanishing in 13.1 seconds at 105 miles. The fun cut offs at the claimed top speed of 118 mph.

Off-road running isn't forgotten, thanks to a suspension system with long travel and adaptive-damping. The upper and lower control arms are forged aluminum. It's independent up front and the spring rates are retuned. Bilstein adaptive shocks are here to help the RHO deal with varying terrain. A Jounce Control system is here to "provide bottom-out control during the most extreme compression events" and all drive modes can provide "peak damping" for the same. Translation: If you bottom out after a jump, the truck should be able to handle it. That said, don't try it at home.

Ram claims a water-fording depth of up to 32 inches.

Towing capacity is listed at 8,380 pounds and payload is listed at 1,520 pounds.

An eight-speed automatic transmission gets power to the wheels. Ram claims the powertrain sheds 150 pounds and that the truck's weight distribution is more balanced.

Since Ram envisions RHO owners playing in nature's sandbox, there's a hood duct that is setup to drain water and filter out debris. The high-flow induction system leads to a performance air filter that is easily accessed for cleaning.

Out back, there's an exhaust system that's unique to the RHO -- it has true dual pipes and a low-restriction system.

A full-time active transfer case from BorgWarner has a low range of 2.64:1 and is said to be stronger and more durable than what's on offer in other Rams. It can be flat-towed in neutral.

There's a Dana 60 rear axle that dampers axle hop, and the axle shafts are full-floating. RHOs have a rear electronic-locking differential, and the rear suspension has a five-link coil system with adaptive damping. Ram promises that the bed capacity won't be reduced by the additional 40 percent of rear-wheel travel. Those wheels, by the way, are 18 inches and host 35-inch tires.

Ride height is increased by 2 inches and the ground clearance for the RHO is 11.8 inches.

RHOs are 8 inches wider (six in track width) and will be visually differentiated by fender flares, LED taillights, and unique badging. Other items that vary from the regular Ram include the skid plates, front grille, hood, and bumpers. The headlights are also LED, along with the front marker lights -- some of which are integrated into the front hood scoop. You also get front and rear tow hooks.

Rock rails and graphics are optional.

Inside, there are upscale materials, custom badging (including one with the VIN), heated and cooled leather seats with suede inserts, carbon-fiber accents, a floor shifter, and paddle shifters. Options include other types of stitching and accents.

You'll plenty of screens, up to 50 inches combined. That includes the 14.5-inch infotainment screen, 12.3-inch gauge screen, and a 10.25-inch screen for passengers.

Drive modes include Baja, Sport, Tow, Mud/Sand, Rock, Snow, Custom, and Valet. There's a launch control system.

Other available tech includes a head-up display and hands-free automated driving that only works on certain roads. There will be dual wireless chargers for mobile devices.

Buyers will be able to get Harman Kardon audio and a system to help steer when attaching a trailer.

If you like hi-po trucks, Ram now offers you the RHO, Warlock, and Rebel on the 1500 and the Power Wagon and Rebel on the 2500 HD. Also new for this year is a Rebel X model that celebrates the 10-year anniversary of that trim and will offer cruise control that works on dirt roads, as well as an exclusive paint color.

The Warlock is lifted by an inch, has Bilstein shocks front and rear, skid plates, unique styling elements, and the 3.0-liter turbocharged inline-six that makes 420 ponies and 469 lb-ft of torque. The sticker for that one is $54,260 plus the $1,995 destination fee.

Pricing will start at $69,995 with a $1,995 destination fee, and orders are open now. RHOs will ship this fall.

[Images: Ram]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next