What Models Will Safeguard Your Wallet Over Five Years?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s normal for many new car buyers to fall out of love with their vehicles once the honeymoon is over and the thrill is gone, though the majority stick with their vehicles for the long haul — well, until the lease period is up, anyway.

The jilted romantics will run to tell Consumer Reports and anyone else in their immediate vicinity about how unsatisfied they are with their car’s finicky infotainment unit and herky-jerky transmission, but their complaints fail to shed any light on costs. Initial quality and customer satisfaction are nice things, but what about the impact on the buyer’s wallet over time?

Kelley Blue Book can provide some advice, as it tallies up the top brands and models based on ownership costs over a five-year period.

Congratulations, Subaru owners — you apparently did the right thing.

In its latest 5-Year Cost to Own study, which assigns a gold star based on depreciation, fuel costs, insurance and finance fees, and repair costs, KBB judged Subaru as the best non-luxury brand. Improvements in reliability and fuel economy earned the all-wheel-drive fan club the top spot — a standing it achieved for the first time two years ago.

For premium buyers, the top luxury brand is not many people’s first choice. Acura has something of an image problem, and fails to light a fire in the hearts of many luxury buyers, but it is KBB’s top pick for a number of reasons. Resale value is high, and the brand’s price points handily undercut its German competition.

A high level of standard content for the money makes Acura vehicles a good pick if you’re not at all interested in having friends and neighbors gush over your new car. Even KBB had to admit that Acuras score low points for prestige. Still, status and prestige can’t be measured in dollars, so the brand’s low standing among premium enthusiasts doesn’t work against it. Hey, your local Acura retailer might just give you a smoking deal on those unloved models!

While both Subaru and Acura scores the highest overall marks on a brand level, the two companies’ offerings didn’t stand out at the model level. Only one model produced by the two brands — the Subaru Crosstrek — topped its own category. (In this case, the compact crossover/SUV segment.)

Among vehicles with pleasing long-term ownership costs, the Chevrolet Spark proved best in the subcompact car category. Chevrolet also topped the full-size category with its Impala, and lead in the full-size SUV/crossover field with its Tahoe. The Bowtie Badge also topped the midsize truck category with its Colorado extended cab, and the full-size truck field with its Silverado 1500 regular cab.

In a bittersweet win, the dead-and-buried Buick Verano placed first in the entry-level luxury car segment. The diminutive Buick Encore received the nod for the compact luxury SUV/crossover

Among compact cars, a very familiar name outran them all. The Toyota Corolla topped its competition in that field, while the Honda Accord ranked best among midsize cars. Honda scored a second mention with its segment-leading — at least in terms of value — HR-V subcompact crossover. The Ford Focus RS, not surprisingly, was named best sporty small car.

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles managed two entries on the list, and the identity of the vehicles shouldn’t shock anyone. The Jeep Wrangler Unlimited, a model with insane resale value, topped the midsize SUV/Crossover category, while the Dodge Grand Caravan — a low-priced model older than the earth’s crust — was the value pick for the minivan segment.

When it came to luxury cars, the winner was Acura’s main competitor, Lexus. The Lexus GS took the podium as best luxury car, while the tried-and-true LS460 and its long-wheelbase brother received top marks among high-end luxury cars. Infiniti took the prize for midsize and full-size luxury SUV/crossovers with its QX60 and QX80 models.

Among sports cars, the fairly mild Toyota 86 was judged best long-term bang for your hard-earned bucks, while the Toyota Prius and Prius Prime led the hybrid and electric vehicles fields.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 72 comments
  • Tjh8402 Tjh8402 on Feb 09, 2017

    Am I missing something or is there no link to the actual KBB study?

  • Vulpine Vulpine on May 28, 2017

    Considering I got nearly 50% trade in on an early '08 JKU Wrangler almost exactly 9 years after taking delivery, I definitely have to say the JKU is the winner, no matter what those other brands did.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next