By on August 5, 2011

NHTSA has denied the niche supercar maker Pagani a waiver for advanced airbag requirements for its new Huayra, possibly forcing the Italian firm to delay US sales until 2015. According to the Federal Register[PDF], Pagani

estimated that if the requested exemption were granted, it would sell 35 to 45 vehicles per year, 6 to 12 vehicles of which would be sold in the United States…. [Pagani] submitted projections estimating that if the petition for exemption is denied and no vehicles are sold in the United States, the company would make an estimated €5,398,000 in net income during the period of 2011 through 2014, compared to €8,613,000 in net income during the same period if an exemption were granted.   The company asserted that the difference in gross revenue between granting and denying the exemption is approximately €34,000,000, and the financial records indicate a difference in projected net income of approximately €3,215,000.

Although Pagani has realized profits in recent years, the company asserted that immediate compliance with the advanced air bag requirements will cause substantial economic hardship.  Specifically, Pagani stated that the company only operates on the cash on hand without lines of credit or debt financing, and its small profit margin is necessary to guard it from market fluctuations. Pagani stated that without an exemption, it will not be able to fund the advanced air bag program, which is estimated as costing €4,000,000, from its non-U.S. sales and will not be able to enter the U.S. market until at least 2015.

Finally, Pagani stated that its production capacity is currently limited to approximately 25 units per year worldwide.  The company indicated that its plan is to expand its production capacity to 50 to 60 units per year worldwide by building a new factory.  However, the company stated that the new factory represents a significant investment for the company and could not be justified without the revenue from U.S. sales.  Accordingly, construction of this new facility cannot begin unless an exemption is granted.

So let’s see: the company hopes to build 60 units per year, stands to lose nearly $50m in gross revenue and nearly half it’s net profit if the request is denied, and will lose access to a huge market for four years… why doesn’t the government count this as a “hardship”? Is NHTSA really that concerned about protecting the handful of  bajillionaires who will be buying the $1.4m Huayra and likely keeping them at a track anyway? The problem: it turns out that Tesla, which enjoyed a waiver for years while receiving tens of millions in taxpayer-backed loans, has ruined the waiver for everyone. According to NHTSA’s post-Tesla change of heart:

low volume manufacturers now have access to advanced air bag technology. Accordingly, NHTSA tentatively concludes that the expense of advanced air bag technology is not now sufficient, in and of itself, to justify the grant of a petition for a hardship exemption from the advanced air bag requirements

Oh well, nobody’s going to miss one of the coolest, most exclusive, most jaw-dropping cars in the world for a few years, while Pagani installs advanced airbags. American bajillionaires just love to be last in line for the new hotness…

5 Comments on “Pagani Huayra Airbag Waiver Denied: No US Sales Until 2015?...”


  • avatar
    sitting@home

    For every law there’s a loophole, and the richer you are the bigger the loophole. I’m sure if a bajillionaire wants one of these so he can cruise for young ladies outside Hollywood nightclubs while his wife is away at a starvation spa, then there will be a way to get it.

    Couldn’t he import the car in kit form and get some desperate car guy he knows (say the CEO of GM) to build it for him ?

    Maybe he could pick one up when his yacht drops anchor in Monte Carlo and bring it back over here as a personal possession.

  • avatar
    ClutchCarGo

    “why doesn’t the government count this as a “hardship”?”

    Because if you give an adv airbag waiver to one $1.4M supercar mfr, every $1.4M supercar mfr will want one, too.

    Seriously, tho, they can’t license somebody else’s adv airbag technology for less than 4M euros?

    • 0 avatar
      roamer

      It’s not R&D that costs; the only way to pass the testing is to give the government several of each car you want federalized. No simulation is permissible; all the tests (low speed, high speed, side) have to be performed on a new car, which is a write-off. If you assume they destroy 3 cars, that’s $4.2 million in lost revenue. Add the actual engineering cost, and it gets pricey quick.
      Why can’t they just create a blanket rule for low-volume manufacturers to allow buyers to sign a wavier that they know what they are doing? Because this is the guv’ment, and they know what’s best for us.

      • 0 avatar
        Tinn-Can

        Meanwhile some dude is doing 150 down the freeway on one wheel in shorts, flipflops and no helmet… Ship them with two wheels and call it a motorcycle…

      • 0 avatar
        joeaverage

        Tinn-Cann -> EXACTLY!!!

        I’m tired of the federal nanny rules.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: GM Decides Not To Kill Off Cadillac’s Best Known Product

    NN - An Escalade has presence like historical Cadillac’s did. A Tahoe/Suburban also has presence, but not like an Escalade. That is...
  • Re: Vellum Venom: 2012 Volkswagen CC

    zamoti - Though I enjoy this series quite a lot, I must say that the cell phone pictures and (sorry) weak photography detract from the otherwise excellent critique....
  • Re: Review: 2012 Honda Civic Natural Gas

    philadlj - Like the Volt, Leaf, Karma, and hell, even the Mitsubishi i, this is a very specialized car that doesn’t work for a majority of Americans. But that...
  • Re: Vellum Venom: 2012 Volkswagen CC

    Carlson Fan - Good looking car no doubt. The roof line does limit head room in the back seat but I’ll always take style at the expense of functionality. Especially...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1988 Dodge Conquest TSi

    Roberto Esponja - Good find, Murilee. I believe these were badged as Chrysler Conquest’s though, not Dodge.
  • Re: Vellum Venom: 2012 Volkswagen CC

    schmitt trigger - I’m also old enough to have owned two beetles and a rabbit. And therefore fully appreciate the substantial improvement that VW has had in the past...
  • Re: Father Ticketed for Saving Son

    Carlson Fan - “Sure, make excuses for the cop. He showed a lack of empathy at a minimum and a tendancy to be a power-hungry jack-booted thug at a maximum.” You...
  • Re: Review: 2012 Honda Civic Natural Gas

    Dr. Claw - icemilkcoffee hit the nail on the head. then chaparral drilled that nail down even further. I’m all for getting weaned off petroleum, but if we gotta...
  • Re: Father Ticketed for Saving Son

    michal1980 - No, I’m not a cop. But again, people like you cannot justify your position with logic and reason, and so you must create strawman that you then attempt to...
  • Re: Vellum Venom: 2012 Volkswagen CC

    Zackman - Sure I do – I see them almost every day! So true… In my post, I wrote “credulity” I think I meant “credibility”.

 

Staff