Last week I wondered aloud about where the UAW stands on fuel economy, inspired by the union’s apparent flip-flopping between supporting the companies that employ its workers and backing its environmental allies on the left with talk of its commitment to green jobs. And after expressing concern about proposed CAFE increases, it seems the UAW is flopping back towards the environmentalist side of the equation, joining the so-called “Blue-Green Coalition” of labor leaders and environmental groups in expressing its vague support for “strong” emissions standards in a letter to President Obama [PDF]. But with CAFE negotiations coming down to within 5 MPG or so of a final “number” for the 2052 standard, the letter’s lack of commitment means it’s still not clear where the UAW comes down in the policy debate. So instead of highlighting the union’s commitment to the environment, the letter ends up serving as a window into the UAW’s cynical, yet self-deluding side.
The letter argues:
If there’s a significant sentence anywhere in the entire letter, it’s “we request your continuing support for federal efforts to assist the auto industry retool to meet demand for cleaner, more efficient cars.” Having pointed to the ATVM Loan program, which sent out some $25b in loans in a manner that inspired charges of lax oversight and political patronage, the BlueGreen Alliance makes it clear that it’s not lobbying for any specific CAFE standard, but rather a handout whatever the standard eventually becomes. And here’s where the argument falls apart: not only did ATVM become a black eye for the government, but the “evidence” that the UAW cites for a connection between green technology and union jobs is falling apart. After all, GM assembles the battery for its green-car-icon Chevy Volt out of Korean-made battery cells, using non-union labor. The EV sector is dependent on suppliers in Japan and Korea for both batteries and components like the Chevy Volt’s transmission, while Ford’s forthcoming Focus EV was developed almost entirely by the Austrian-Canadian supplier Magna International. Arguing that more public money will translate into UAW-represented “green jobs” is a mirage, and environmental firms should be ashamed to be lending their moral authority (with those who buy into it) to what amounts to a campaign for union handouts.
Tagged as ATVM, CAFE, EV, Fuel Economy, Government, Green, jobs, Regulation, uaw, Union News
3 Comments on “UAW Backs “Strong” Emissions Standards After All… For A Price...”
Back to TopLeave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You can also login using Facebook Connect.
When everything funded by this administration goes awry and your questioning it? It’s just politics as usual in the U$.
+1! And that is a damn shame.
With them, it’s all about what can America do for the unions instead of what can the unions do for America. Bargaining their memberships out a job or bargaining their employers into bankruptcy does not bode well for America.
Politics as usual.
Competitively exposed unions have long since shrank to the point where they cannot rely on promises of their memberships’ voting to sway policy their way. Instead, they have to reach out and build coalitions. With people who can fairly easily be convinced that whether theft and coercion is OK, depends on who is doing it.
And what easier band of marks could they possibly find, than those gullible enough to believe CAFE mileage standards waay out in the future has any practical relevance whatsoever. After all, seemingly most of that same sociographic, genuinely believes Cuba has a good health care “system”, and are perfectly willing to flush America down the toilet, based on little more than blind faith in myths like that.