Are You Ready For: The Diesel Sportscar?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

In the post-Veyron, post-Horsepower Wars world, “Responsible Performance” has been the catchphrase on the lips of every purveyor of performance cars. And with Audi and Nissan already set to brawl for EV sportscar niche that’s being abandoned by Tesla with the forthcoming end of production of its Roadster, diesel power seems to be benefiting from a second look by would-be “responsible performance” vendors.

Unsurprisingly, the tuning houses are promoting their diesel efforts, as EV tuning presents significant challenges to the ICE-based tuning community. And the BMW modifiers at AC Schnitzer are leading the way with this Z4 “99d,” a 188 HP, 310 lb-ft two-liter turbodiesel roadster capable of 146 MPH. Oh yes, and 99 grams of CO2 per Km, or (very roughly) 60-ish MPG (non-EPA). Sound like a healthy compromise between “responsibility” and performance? The only thing you’ll have to give up is the $210,000 that Automobile says this Schintzer concept would cost if it were built.


Prefer something a little more built-in-some-British-guys-shed? Peep the Trident Iceni, a TVR-style British beast that its makers claim returned around 57 MPG (69 MPG Imperial, non-EPA) at a constant 70 MPH in testing at Millbrook Proving Ground. Its 6.6 liter Duramax V8 can operate on 100 percent biodiesel, tops out at 170 MPH (limited) and runs the quarter-mile in 12 seconds. Iceni even claimed the thing will have a (wait for it) 2,000 mile range. And unlike the Z4 99d, it’s supposed to be in production… although the Trident website isn’t encouraging. Perhaps a Britian-based reader in the know could fill us in?

And then there’s the VW Bluesport, a mid-engined MR-2-alike boasting a stop-start-equipped diesel engine, at least in its European iteration. For the US it will almost certainly be offered exclusively with the GTI’s 2.0T powerplant, but if grunty, efficient sportscars are your thing, start lobbying VW now, as it won’t start shipping to the US until 2013 at the earliest. And if VW chickens out, perhaps Audi will supplement its electric R4 eTron with a an oil-burning version in the US market. Or what about a diesel R8, like the one Audi hinted at back in 2008? After all, BMW is combining diesel and electric power for its forthcoming i8 “responsible performance” supercar, which will not be available in a gas version, meaning we’ll be guaranteed to get at least some kind of diesel performance car in the US at some point. And as a US-market leader in diesel sales, as well as a diesel-powered LeMans dominator, Audi seems like a brand begging for an oil-burning supercar. With a little luck, we’ll see more progress in this intriguing trend in the near future…


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 23 comments
  • Th009 Th009 on Mar 31, 2011

    Audi has been selling the TT TDI in Europe for several years already.

  • YellowDuck YellowDuck on Mar 31, 2011

    After watching that Audi diesel GTP car tear up the LeMans series...yeah, I'd say diesel has sporting cred. Probably a lot more useable in real-world "sporty driving" applications than a gas engine too. How often are we shifting our cars at redline currently? Maybe a lot if you are 17 years old.

    • See 1 previous
    • D101 D101 on Mar 31, 2011

      Diesels do better in LeMans only because the regulations were in their favor. We'll see the new rules for this year though.

  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Next