The "Brand Savior" Rover 55 That Was Never Built

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Before the remnants of the British Leyland empire were sold off to various developing-world automakers (in an intriguing automotive inversion of colonialism), BMW temporarily became the caretaker of a number of British auto brands, including Rover, MG, Land Rover, and Mini. Only Mini now remains under Bavarian fealty, but before dumping the mess on the hapless Phoenix Consortium, BMW helped the Rover brand develop its only halfway-competitive car of the 1990s: the retro-inspired Rover 75. And according to Britain’s AutoExpress, BMW also helped Rover developed this odd duck, known as the 55, as an attack upmarket on Audi’s A4 and Mercedes’ C-Class. It was to be followed by a larger replacement for the 75, which would have given Rover a one-two punch to match the Mercedes C and E Classes, Audi’s A4 and A6 and so on.

The long-nosed look of this 1997 design study is the result of a Passat/A4-style longitudinal-front-drive platform, which (like the 75’s platform) had been experimentally developed by BMW. Of course, the looks are a bit odd, and BMW really didn’t need to develop unique-platform competitors for its 3- and 5-Series, so this car was probably never likely to make it to production. Still, it’s interesting to imagine what Rover would be like today if it were still struggling along with a large neo-retro flagship based on dated German technology and not much else… except that then it would pretty much be a British Chrysler.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 24 comments
  • Jimboy Jimboy on Aug 20, 2010

    Actually a very handsome car, IMO. And yes it could be a British Chrysler. I'd buy one.

  • Sinistermisterman Sinistermisterman on Aug 20, 2010

    If it'd ever been released it would have been yet another Rover which was only bought by those over the age of 40, only to be sold on after 5-6 years after MASSIVE depreciation to someone who would've treated it like crap. It's second owner would no doubt be another tracksuit/baseball cap/Rebok classic wearing genius who would have then bolted a body kit and 'phat' exhaust onto it, lowered the suspension, fitted a massive subwoofer in the boot, tinted all the windows, and then driven it around at stupid speeds. Such is the fate of all old Rovers in the UK.

    • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on Aug 20, 2010

      Wow, you just made me picture the light blue, well polish Rover owned by Richard Bucket from "Keeping Up Appearances" suffering that fate. (shudder) No car deserves that. When my now exwife asked what a Rover was (we were watching the series in syndication on PBS) I told her it was a "British version of Buick/Oldsmobile that had fallen on hard times."

  • Ajla So a $10K+ transmission repair?
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X I've mentioned before about being very underwhelmed by the Hornet for a $50000+ all in price tag. Just wasn't for me. I'd prefer a Mazda CX-5 or even a Rogue.
  • MaintenanceCosts Other sources seem to think that the "electric Highlander" will be built on TNGA and that the other 3-row will be on an all-new EV-specific platform. In that case, why bother building the first one at all?
  • THX1136 Two thoughts as I read through the article. 1) I really like the fins on this compared to the others. For me this is a jet while the others were propeller driven craft in appearance.2) The mention of the wider whitewalls brought to mind a vague memory. After the wider version fell out of favor I seem to remember that one could buy add-on wide whitewalls only that fit on top of the tire so the older look could be maintained. I remember they would look relatively okay until the add-on would start to ripple and bow out indicating their exact nature. Thanks for the write up, Corey. Looking forward to what's next.
  • Analoggrotto It's bad enough we have to read your endless Hyundai Kia Genesis shilling, we don't want to hear actually it too. We spend good money on speakers, headphones and amplifiers!
Next