Junkyard Find: 1984 Chevy Citation II 5-Door Hatchback

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Ah, the General Motors X-body cars! Always good for some anecdotes from readers about rust-through on two-year-old cars, amazing quantities of warranty repairs, and Stuka-dive-style depreciation graphs. After the Citation, the Chevy Corsica seemed like a fine automobile.

So far in this series, we’ve seen this ’80 Skylark, this ’81 Citation, this ’81 Citation, this frighteningly rusty ’81 Citation, this ’82 Citation, this ’82 Citation, this ’83 Citation, and this ’84 Omega, and (because I just can’t resist shooting these things when I see them, no doubt because I believe this ’84 X-body Pontiac to be rivaled only by this 1986 Plymouth Reliant wagon for the dubious prize of Worst Car I’ve Ever Driven), this late-production ’84 Citation II.

The Citation II name was part of The General’s attempt to show that the reliability problems that plagued the 1980-83 Citations were over, forever. Car shoppers were skeptical, and 1985 was the final year for the Citation.

A vertically-oriented cassette deck. It’s not quite a telescreen, but as a member of the Class of 1984, I belonged to the future and understood that vertical orientation was the only way to play my mix tapes.

This is the kind of rust you get in California, where I shot this car. Paint flakes off in the harsh sun, rainwater gets under the trim (back when it used to rain in California), and this happens.

Remember the signature blue AlmostVelour™ of 1980s GM cars? Turns out it survives pretty well.

“After making so many engineering refinements, we made one more change: the name!”





Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 64 comments
  • -Nate -Nate on Oct 18, 2015

    CC ect ! . I was at Valley Mercedes Thursday evening and the same old Oldsmobile of this platform was still sitting there all dusty with it's original paint... Being a four door I imagine it's worthless . -Nate

  • -Nate -Nate on Oct 18, 2015

    CC effect ! . I was at Valley Mercedes Thursday evening and the same old Oldsmobile of this platform was still sitting there all dusty with it's original paint... Being a four door I imagine it's worthless . Wait ~ it has a hatchback so it's a five door ? . -Nate

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next