This Is the Closest You'll Get to a New International Harvester Truck

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Which is to say, not close at all. The automotive brand born of the farm equipment giant produced its last passenger vehicle — the long-in-the-tooth Scout SUV — for the 1980 model year, five years after its pickup line bit the fertile Midwestern dust. Not long after, International Harvester ceased to exist as an independent brand, shacking up with Tenneco subsidiary I.J. Case after the company hit the skids and sold off its agricultural division. Navistar International Corp. rose from the remaining IH ashes.

The truck you see above is most certainly a Ram HD, but the paint is all International Harvester. You guessed it — the bright minds at FCA have come up with another special edition. By our count, it’s the 987th of the past decade.

Available on 2019 Ram 3500 (and up) Chassis Cabs, the Harvest Edition treatment has nothing to do with Neil Young’s 1972 album and everything to do with mechanized farming heritage. Of the four colors offered, two come directly from the flanks of combines, tractors, or threshers.

Those colors, IH Case Red and New Holland Blue (joined by black and white), are the product of a “direct request” from farmers in the American heartland, FCA claims. With these editions, buyers can let their agricultural allegiances fly, says Ram head Jim Morrison.

It isn’t the first time Ram’s offered a Harvest Edition, though the prior version, available on 2018 models, didn’t expand into the Chassis Cab range and called it quits at the 3500 pickup model.

FCA is quick to point out that both agricultural brands see their equipment manufactured by a subsidiary of CNH Industrial, which shares a “common ancestry” with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. Sadly, there’s no green-and-yellow John Deere treatment on offer.

Debuting Tuesday at Husker Harvest Days in Grand Island, Nebraska — site of a bizarre 1980 tornado swarm — the Harvest Edition trucks span the Chassis Cab lineup, available in every wheelbase and cab configuration. They’re well fleshed out with a standard chrome package, leather-wrapped steering wheel, and 8.4-inch Uconnect touchscreen, among other features. Front tow hooks and a transfer case skid plate handle the rough-and-tumble side of its persona.

Pricing starts at $43,990 (plus $1,695 destination charge) for a 3500 model, topping out at just under $51k for the 5500 truck after factoring in the charge.

We’re placing bets on the next special edition.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 21 comments
  • Sigivald Sigivald on Sep 11, 2018

    What, no mention of the RXT/MXT from the mid-2000s? (States vary, but here in Oregon you don't need a CDL for the RXT or MXT, but the CXT's GVWR is high enough you would.)

    • TwoBelugas TwoBelugas on Sep 13, 2018

      I thought Oregon's class C is good for anything less than 26,001 lbs GVWR? The CXT was "rated" at 25,999 lbs for GVWR.

  • Dilrod Dilrod on Sep 11, 2018

    New Holland bought the Ford tractor line, hence their blue color. Some of you may remember that New Holland's original colors were red & yellow. They only built machinery, not tractors. Ford spun off the tractor division years ago. Ford could snub FCA by offering that blue color on an F150. That would teach 'em!

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next