Official 2018 Chevrolet Equinox Diesel Fuel Economy Numbers Don't Quite Get to the 40-MPG Mark

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

General Motors’ expectation that the 2018 Chevrolet Equinox Diesel would climb to the arbitrarily important 40 miles per gallon marker will not be fulfilled by the production Equinox.

In accordance with Environmental Protection Agency procedures, the Equinox 1.6TD comes up short of the 40-mpg highway marker by a single mpg.

Released today by General Motors and likely to be featured on the EPA’s fueleconomy.gov website on August 15th, the front-wheel-drive 2018 Chevrolet Equinox Diesel is rated at 28 miles per gallon in the city and 39 on the highway, for a combined rating of 32 miles per gallon.

Diesel-powered, all-wheel-drive Equinoxes share the 28 mpg city rating and the 32 mpg combined rating, but drop to a 38 mpg highway rating.

GM calls the 39 mpg highway result “expected segment-topping” fuel economy, but we’ve yet to see what Mazda achieves once the EPA certifies the CX-5 Skyactiv-D.

Compared with other editions of the Equinox, the 1.6TD offers a combined rating equivalent to the best highway rating of any of the other models: the front-wheel-drive 1.5T, which has a city rating of 26 mpg. The thirstiest Equinox, meanwhile, is the hi-po 2.0T all-wheel-drive, for which premium fuel is recommended. It’s rated at 22 mpg city, 28 highway and 24 combined.

Prior to the CX-5 diesel’s arrival, the Equinox 1.6TD’s most efficient rivals are the Nissan Rogue Hybrid and Toyota RAV4 Hybrid, which have combined ratings of 32-34 miles per gallon, though the Equinox is measurably more thrifty on the highway.

The 1.6 turbocharged diesel, offered in top Equinox trims, commands a premium over the 2.0T, but, due to equipment differences, the comparison is not as straightforward as you’d expect. Including fees, the 2018 Chevrolet Equinox Diesel is priced from $31,435.

Sales expectations are modest. GM hopes to see 5 percent of Equinox buyers opt for the diesel, which would have translated to roughly 1,200 U.S. sales in July 2017.

[Image: General Motors]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 24 comments
  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Aug 14, 2017

    As with the current Chevy Cruze that uses the same powertrain I would suspect the Equinox to easily exceed the lower than expected 39 rating.

    • NormSV650 NormSV650 on Sep 14, 2017

      TFL youtube review has the diesel at 38 mpg on their short highway drive. So with some help it'll easily achieve 40 mpg.

  • Jerome10 Jerome10 on Aug 14, 2017

    I go up and down on diesel. I think they'll make some sales, but after owning one in Germany (highway commute), and what came with it, I'm not sure I'd do it again, even with the fuel cost savings (you have in Germany). So complicated, anything that breaks is seemingly expensive or hard to replace yourself. The torque is nice, yes, as is the cruising MPG. The noise, lack of fun winding the engine out, vibrations, heavy nose feeling... all turn offs. In the USA you really just have to be a diesel fan to really justify one, IMHO. Extra so when you live in an area where diesel often costs more than premium gas. But I get why people like these. I could see Chevy and Mazda carving out a little slice of customer satisfaction with these. But like Kyree states above, come 2019, I fully expect Mazda's HCCI engines to make any diesel obsolete for any non heavy duty application. Basically all of the positives, none of the negatives of diesel.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next