Chevrolet's Real People Commercials Are Once Again Pitting Silverado Against F-150

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

With the July 10 launch of a new Chevrolet Silverado commercial, General Motors is once again using its Real People, Not Actors campaign in an attempt to tarnish the Ford F-150’s good name.

This methodology doesn’t appear to have had an impact in the marketplace in the past. Yet two years after General Motors displayed conversations between Howie Long and GM engineer Eric Stanczak discussing repair costs on the Ford F-150’s aluminum bed and one year after Chevrolet punctured a Ford F-150’s aluminum bed with 825 pounds of concrete blocks, General Motors is turning to admitted Ford F-150 owners as a means of casting aspersions on America’s top-selling full-size truck.

After earlier rounds, Ford gained ground in America’s full-size pickup truck market in 2016. Indeed, Ford is continuing to gain ground in that same market in 2017. Ford is selling more trucks than its rivals. Ford is selling more trucks with less incentivization. Ford is selling more trucks with less incentivization at higher average transaction prices.

So, GM sends the Chevrolet Silverado back to the same ol’ well.

To be fair, not all Real People, Not Actors commercials are equally bad. From the ghastly Emoji Cruze ad to the Malibu at the Glass House to the painful hipster variant, plenty have been awful. But more recently, GM seemed to have found its way, running a Chevrolet Equinox campaign in which people don’t manage to slap Chevrolet with a backhand compliment, in which competitors are only digged with subtlety at the end of the commercial.

Regardless of how in-the-know car enthusiasts feel about the ads, GM believes they work. In fact, GM is operating under the assumption that the ads work, in part, because the viewer knows what to expect. “For the foreseeable future, we don’t have a change in mind.”

Attacking the core element of America’s best-selling vehicle lineup, however, is an entirely different matter. It’s like going after Tom Brady for deflategate. He still won the Super Bowl, and he’s still gonna win another Super Bowl.

Sure, maybe there are vast swathes of America that don’t like Tom Brady, that wouldn’t buy a Tom Brady if Tom Brady could be bought. But you’re still attempting to win a losing argument against the guy who will beat you.

The latest Chevrolet attack on the Ford F-150 involves a camouflaged Silverado, F-150 owners who apparently didn’t buy Ford’s bed ladder system, who were seemingly unaware when they purchased their aluminum F-150s that they could have purchased a truck with the same kind of steel bed that’s been part of the truck world since 900 B.C., and who pretend to know what an automatic locking rear differential does.

These F-150 owners were evidently easy to sway. Consumers who don’t appear in General Motors’ ads? Not quite so easy.

Through the first six months of 2017, GM has seen its total share of America’s full-size pickup truck market, including the Sierra, fall to 32.3 percent from 35.5 percent in the first half of last year. Not only is the entire Ford F-Series line outselling the GM full-size twins, F-Series volume is greater than the entire GM truck lineup, midsize pickups included.

Meanwhile, over a three-month period spanning March, April, and May, the Chevrolet Silverado wasn’t even America’s second-best-selling truck. FCA’s Ram P/U stole the silver medal position.

Maybe the Ram 1500 is the pickup Chevrolet should be attacking. Rotary shifters? Ecodiesel? RamBoxes and those narrow beds?

Puh-leeze. Real people might not like that at all.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 81 comments
  • Akear Akear on Jul 21, 2017

    GM trucks are rubbish too. What a disgrace!!!!

  • Gkhize Gkhize on Aug 01, 2017

    I seem to recall a story here on TTAC that GM would be moving to aluminum body panels on their trucks in the future. If that's in fact true, aren't they being a little disingenuous slamming the Ford? I also agree with earlier comments; tell me why I should buy your product, not what's wrong with someone else's. Seems to me you're hiding something when you do that. Also, that new Equinox commercial bugs me because it shows a totally tricked out new vehicle so the people they put in it think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread and better than their vehicle. GM neglects to point out that the Equinox they are sitting in probably costs $10K more than the 'real people's' cars, so of course it seems better.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next