Oshawa Will Lose 'Doomed' Consolidated Line in 2017: Report

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

There might be some light at the end of the assembly line for Oshawa — but it will come with a price.

According to the Windsor Star, the plant’s Consolidated Line, which produces the Chevrolet Equinox in an overflow capacity using bodies shuttled from CAMI, won’t get another stay of execution and will certainly close in 2017.

However, a General Motors Canada executive familiar with the negotiations says that closing the Flex Line is not a “foregone conclusion.”

“The line is due to end production sometime in 2017,” said the source who spoke on condition of anonymity with the Windsor Star. “We haven’t said exactly when, but likely mid-year when we end production of the current generation of the Equinox”

GM Canada has postponed closing the Consolidated Line five times during the last eleven years. It was most recently scheduled to shut down in 2016. An announcement last year kept the line open into 2017.

Closing the Consolidated Line will take 750 jobs with it. In total, the Oshawa Assembly facility employs 2,400 hourly workers. The end of Camaro production on the Flex Line in November 2015 resulted in approximately 1,000 layoffs.

GM Canada has openly stated it will make no decisions on its Oshawa Flex Line until union negotiations conclude later this summer. Unifor, the union that represents hourly employees at Oshawa and other Detroit Three plants in Ontario, has promised to make product allocation a strike issue during labor negotiations. Unifor also believes the Consolidated Line can be saved.

“The life of that plant has been extended a few times and I don’t expect that to change,” Unifor president Jerry Dias told the Windsor Star. “There will be overflow from CAMI for several years.”

However, dumping the Consolidated Line to get production allocation for the Flex Line might be the best outcome for hourly employees.

“(The Flex Line) has the ability to come up with amazing solutions; we’re not ruling anything out, but we’ve clearly said that we’re going to end production on the consolidated line next year,” said Windsor Star’s source.

The current four-year contract between Unifor and General Motors expires September 19. Negotiations begin August 10.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 50 comments
  • Mikey Mikey on Aug 01, 2016

    Okay. I'll , I've been following. First off., as others have mentioned , Mark made the rules, and the consequences perfectly clear. As far as i am concerned, thats that, and, we'll move on. So, an executive at GM leaked to the press, that shutting.,down Oshawa Flex, was not a given. Right?... I call B.S. "the leak" is all part of GM's game plan. Preliminary talks "tire kicking" as they call it, start on the 10th of August. No way, is someone at a senior level at GM going to risk his career , to talk to the Windsor Star. As late as January 2016, when asked by Prime Minister Trudeau "what the plan was for GM Oshawa," Mary Barra, wasn't willing to show her hand. However, now its August, and GM just threw that little nugget out there, to test the water. The" consolidated line " ,just as the name suggests, was cobbled together, back in 2007-08 out of the remnants of plant #2.."W" car. ...# 1 "W" car plant was gutted, back to the studs, while they put the Flex Plant together. At the time, it was figured, maybe we will get 3 years out of it ? It would be a gross under statement , to say that a "few things " might have changed at GM since the 2007-2008 era. When the last"W" fleet Impala rolled of the line in June of 16, that was the beginning of the end. Shuttling Equinox bodys, down the 401, as the sole product of an assembly line, just does nor make economic sense. So news of Consolidated being axed, is hardly earth shattering. The Flex, as once again, the name suggests , is indeed "flexible" all new and modern, with a contagious stamping plant next door. Some new, some older, retrofitted presses . The stamping plant at one point, was feeding "outer metal" fenders, doors , body sides, roofs , hoods etc, enough to run plant #1 and Plant #2, and a good percentage of Truck metal, fenders , hoods, floor pans, doors and box sides. Lots of stamping capacity, with a fairly modern automated ,storage and retrieval system. That all being said, while the Flex can produce just about anything, its not as easy as pulling a lever, and churning out a whole new configuration. A lot preliminary work involving Die sets , tooling adjustments etc requires a fair bit of lead time. Right ,so this great secret as to "is GM going to close Oshawa, or not" isn't such a great secret anymore. I'm hearing from many sources , that the activity level ,re- new product , is turning up a notch or two ????. When more than one party, knows a secret, it ain't a secret for too much longer. Wth all the behind the scenes activity going on, its stands to reason, that GM might just let a little leak out, before the Dam bursts, and all the info comes spewing out.

    • See 5 previous
    • Adam Tonge Adam Tonge on Aug 01, 2016

      Thanks for posting mikey. I, and I know countless others, appreciate your insights on manufacturing, Oshawa, and CAW/UAW/Unifor topics.

  • Mikey Mikey on Aug 01, 2016

    Thanks....I've been working,on punctuation, grammar , and sentence structure. It was getting late last night, and I just hit the submit button....Should have proof read, a little more carefully .

    • VoGo VoGo on Aug 01, 2016

      My approach is to write the post and hit "submit" and then go back and "click to edit" to proofread my comment. Regardless, Mikey, your comments are consistently worth wading through a little grammatical license.

  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
  • Keith Most of the stanced VAGS with roof racks are nuisance drivers in my area. Very likely this one's been driven hard. And that silly roof rack is extra $'s, likely at full retail lol. Reminds me of the guys back in the late 20th century would put in their ads that the installed aftermarket stereo would be a negotiated extra. Were they going to go find and reinstall that old Delco if you didn't want the Kraco/Jenson set up they hacked in?
Next