Fiat Chrysler Spends $1.5 Billion on Next-Generation Ram; Hands Chrysler 200 December Death Notice

by Steph Willems

Published: July 27th, 2016

fiat chrysler spends 1 5 billion on next generation ram hands chrysler 200 december

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles knows what models bring home the bacon, so there won’t be many corporate tears shed over its decision to axe the Chrysler 200.

Yesterday, the automaker announced $1.48 billion in funding to retool its Sterling Heights, Michigan assembly plant, paving the way for the next generation of Ram trucks. To free up space for lucrative pickup production, FCA just sent the 200 on the long walk to the gallows.

Ram production will move to Sterling Heights from the Warren assembly plant to beef up Ram production. (A Warren announcement will come later, FCA says.) Next-generation models arrive for 2018, and FCA can’t have a problem product stemming the flow of vehicles from its surging truck brand.

So, the automaker will pull the plug on the 200 in December. With its sales in the gutter, the 200 is that guy on the life raft who doesn’t do anything useful, but drinks a lot of water. FCA plans to bash the similarly underperforming Dodge Dart with an oar in September, making room at its Belvidere, Illinois plant for Jeep Cherokee production.

FCA just sank more than $1 billion into its golden child, the staggeringly hot Jeep brand. Who can blame them? If it sells like happy promises at election time, an automaker would be stupid not to throw cash at it.

By Christmas, FCA won’t have a compact or midsize car in its stable — a first for the company, and something that would have been unthinkable just a couple of decades ago.

CEO Sergio Marchionne’s plan to outsource small car production to another automaker hit a brick wall when no one showed up to dance. With no partner announced, FCA’s non-truck/crossover/SUV lineup will consist of the aging LX platform full-sizers and the Fiat 500.

Just our two cents: TTAC writers agree that Sergio should court Mazda for the honor of building his castoffs. (Feast your eyes on our concept of a Mazda3-based Dart replacement.)

#2018Ram #Chrysler200 #DodgeDart #Fca #FiatChryslerAutomoobiles #PassengerCars #ProductPlanning #Production #Ram #SterlingHeights

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

6 of 90 comments

VoGo on Jul 27, 2016

Dodge = dead brand walking.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Lou_BC on Jul 27, 2016
  
  @VoGo - agreed.
  
  Like
- Heavy handle on Jul 28, 2016
  
  @Lou_BC I don't. As I've stated before, the Charger and Challenger are what saved Dodge. They sell to real customers for real money, unlike all the "0 down 96 month financing" crud that were cancelled. There will be a few lean years for the Dodge brand (not the dealers, they are doing fine), but we should see the new RWD mid-size soon, and a Pacifica-based crossover.
  
  Like
George Taramas on Jul 28, 2016

Now its a good time to bring the new fiat tipo to the us. Call it the new chrysler 100, price it well and you have a winner against the nissan versa and many other competitors.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Heavy handle on Jul 28, 2016
  
  The Tipo would make a great Fiat in the US. It's been getting great reviews in Europe, but it's still a bit too small and too cheap for the Chrysler badge.
  
  Like
- George Taramas on Jul 28, 2016
  
  @heavy handle Like you said. It gets great reviews because its a very good and beautiful car. In many european countries its the second best selling fiat, behind the 500,outselling the 500x, 500L and the aging punto. The point is that fca needs a car like tipo in the u.s.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.