Snapchat Lawsuit: What Actually Happened on That Georgia Highway?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The trial has all the ingredients needed to garner a nation’s attention: a young female driver, a speeding Mercedes, a dark, rain-slicked highway, a carelessly wielded phone, a potentially dangerous social media app, and a hard-working man left permanently disabled.

The lawsuit against Snapchat and motorist Christal McGee by Wentworth Maynard, the driver of the Mitsubishi Outlander rear-ended by McGee’s C230 outside of Atlanta last September, alleges the social media app’s speed filter played a role in the collision.

McGee was going 107 miles per hour in a 55 mph zone when she hit Maynard, driving fast so she could post a selfie stating her current speed via Snapchat’s “miles per hour” filter, the complainant’s lawyer alleges.

The ride ended in tragedy, with Uber driver Maynard left with a traumatic brain injury that turned his life upside down. McGee posted a selfie of herself lying on a stretcher following the collision.

Infuriating and outrageous, yes. If the allegations are true.

Terrible crashes happen every day, so the initial burst of reporting stemmed from the lawsuit itself. A social media app being sued for negligence? This is hot stuff.

The facts emerging from the case, however, are sparse.

McGee didn’t actually send a Snapchat selfie that stated her speed. The only Snapchat documentation of the crash is McGee’s selfie from the stretcher. Media reports paint a picture of McGee attempting to go as fast as she could behind the wheel, hitting 113 mph at one point, but they’re drawn from a statement by the complainant’s lawyer, Michael L. Neff.

The police investigation is ongoing. The wet pavement didn’t allow for analysis of either vehicle’s speed, but it’s clear the devastating impact required a very high rate of speed. The police who responded to the crash don’t know how Snapchat made its way into the case, because they never mentioned it.

Snapchat has since added a pop-up warning to its speed filter to deter people from using it while behind the wheel. Putting cynicism to use, it’s easy to see how the app could become the target of a range of litigants.

A Georgia CBS affiliate took a second look at the case, and found a witness who was in McGee’s car at the time of the crash who says the events that night didn’t transpire the way the lawyer claims.

Henry Williams, who claims to no longer be in contact with McGee, told CBS46 that he was in the passenger seat next to McGee at the time of the crash, and said that no phones or Snapchat apps were in use.

Williams claims that Maynard’s Mitsubishi pulled out in front of the car, but didn’t speed up. Though he can’t accurately recall the speed of the Mercedes, he said he doubts it was 113 mph.

So, what really happened on that rainy highway? Hopefully, the facts will come out during the trial by jury requested by the complainant’s attorneys.

[Image: www.mlnlaw.com]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 28 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Apr 30, 2016

    Passenger William totally throws her under the bus. "Irrr, I doubt it was 113 MPH". Wtf?? "OK sir, would you say, at least 90 MPH??" His reaction tells it all. But even if Maynard really pulled out and failed to speed up, he still had to be doing at least 25 MPH, so where does the terrific difference in speed come from? And this minus all the speed she scrubbing off, in the time it took Maynard to round a corner, to fully traveling in the lane ahead of them. If she was traveling anywhere near the speed limit, and a *slow motion* Maynard pulls out "point blank", where she can't avoid a contact, she couldn't have slammed him in the rear area.

  • Spartan Spartan on May 01, 2016

    I fail to see why Snapchat is being sued. This is the fault of the driver and the driver only. Sue the driver and her insurance company on the civil side. Prosecute her criminally for the speeding.

  • Alan Where's Earnest? TX? NM? AR? Must be a new Tesla plant the Earnest plant.
  • Alan Change will occur and a sloppy transition to a more environmentally friendly society will occur. There will be plenty of screaming and kicking in the process.I don't know why certain individuals keep on touting that what is put forward will occur. It's all talk and BS, but the transition will occur eventually.This conversation is no different to union demands, does the union always get what they want, or a portion of their demands? Green ideas will be put forward to discuss and debate and an outcome will be had.Hydrogen is the only logical form of renewable energy to power transport in the future. Why? Like oil the materials to manufacture batteries is limited.
  • Alan As the established auto manufacturers become better at producing EVs I think Tesla will lay off more workers.In 2019 Tesla held 81% of the US EV market. 2023 it has dwindled to 54% of the US market. If this trend continues Tesla will definitely downsize more.There is one thing that the established auto manufacturers do better than Tesla. That is generate new models. Tesla seems unable to refresh its lineup quick enough against competition. Sort of like why did Sears go broke? Sears was the mail order king, one would think it would of been easier to transition to online sales. Sears couldn't adapt to on line shopping competitively, so Amazon killed it.
  • Alan I wonder if China has Great Wall condos?
  • Alan This is one Toyota that I thought was attractive and stylish since I was a teenager. I don't like how the muffler is positioned.
Next