Guess Which Cars Sell In Japan? Imports. Now Guess Which Ones

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

According to U.A.W. talking points, the Japanese car market is closed to foreign imports, and the yen is kept artificially low. Utter insanity on both counts. The customs duty on new cars imported to Japan is exactly zero, and the yen is so obscenely expensive that Japanese carmakers openly threaten to leave and privately are shifting as much production as possible out of the country. Unbeknownst to talking point readers, Japan has had a thriving car import market for decades. For more than a year, imports to Japan showed an uptick. TTAC has been taking about this for quite a while, here, then here and also here.

Today, The Nikkei [sub] did wise up to the fact that imports are getting hotter in Japan despite a tepid new car market. The Nikkei sent a reporter to an Audi showroom, interviewed a BMW customer, and noted a societal change: “My wife prefers foreign cars, so that’s why we bought one,” a bank employee who traded his domestic car for a BMW told The Nikkei. “They have lower fuel efficiency than Japanese cars, but that is not a big problem because we drive only on weekends.”

Now what’s really going on with imports to Japan? Let’s look at it a little closer.

At first glance, we see that Japan has been importing foreign cars for quite a while in decent quantities. The peak was in 1994 with nearly 400,000 units. The low was in 2009, when everything was low. In 2010, unit sales were already above 200,000 with a trend up. Market share gives a better picture than units sales. We show the import share of passenger vehicles, because that’s what’s mostly imported. The 8 percent market share in 2011 is as of September 2011, we don’t show unit sales for that year, because we don’t have them yet. They will be up.

Now let’s look who imports the mostest. To the left, we have the September sales. The market share is the share of all imports, not the share of the total market. We see the September sales 2010, and the growth compared to September 2010. Then, the whole experiment again for the first nine months.

Imports Japan September 2011 January – September 20112011Share2010Growth2011Share2010

GrowthVolkswagen Group9,25527.24%6,63039.59%53,66025.97%51,5464.10%VW6,44418.96%4,55741.41%37,29018.05%38,192-2.36%Audi2,7838.19%2,05035.76%16,2147.85%13,20422.80%Bentley160.05%19-15.79%850.04%101-15.84%Lamborghini100.03%4150.00%690.03%4843.75%Bugatti20.01%20.00%1100.00%Nissan6,01517.70%6,605-8.93%41,96120.31%16,913148.10%BMW Group5,94317.49%5,4958.15%34,75816.82%32,3407.48%BMW4,16512.26%4,1300.85%24,00511.62%23,4152.52%BMW MINI1,7585.17%1,32632.58%10,5765.12%8,71421.37%BMW Alpina170.05%21-19.05%1140.06%159-28.30%Rolls Royce30.01%18-83.33%630.03%5221.15%Daimler4,92914.51%4,7833.05%25,64412.41%25,1152.11%Mercedes-Benz4,68813.80%4,701-0.28%24,64511.93%24,2931.45%smart2400.71%82192.68%9900.48%82020.73%Maybach10.00%90.00%2350.00%Fiat-Chrysler1,7435.13%1,51914.75%10,2244.95%8,88315.10%Fiat8172.40%882-7.37%4,4792.17%4,3772.33%Jeep4351.28%27458.76%2,4071.16%1,42269.27%Alfa Romeo1980.58%15626.92%1,5420.75%1,22525.88%Dodge1740.51%68155.88%7830.38%63223.89%Chrysler410.12%75-45.33%4490.22%630-28.73%Maserati360.11%2924.14%2000.10%217-7.83%Ferrari310.09%2810.71%2940.14%332-11.45%Lancia110.03%757.14%700.03%4845.83%Toyota1,4244.19%1,10229.22%10,0314.85%6,97343.85%Volvo1,6054.72%96167.01%8,1723.95%5,64744.71%PSA Group1,0783.17%1,230-12.36%6,7843.28%6,2308.89%Peugeot6982.05%874-20.14%4,5692.21%4,573-0.09%Citroen3801.12%3566.74%2,2151.07%1,65733.68%Suzuki2280.67%402-43.28%2,8951.40%3,517-17.69%Porsche3921.15%21879.82%2,5971.26%2,5103.47%Ford3521.04%31810.69%2,4211.17%2,2955.49%Renault3541.04%24544.49%2,3161.12%2,03613.75%General Motors2930.86%18955.03%2,2131.07%1,77424.75%Chevrolet1560.46%64143.75%8640.42%67627.81%Cadillac1060.31%979.28%1,0370.50%74539.19%Hummer180.05%21-14.29%2180.11%276-21.01%GMC100.03%666.67%840.04%7020.00%Buick20.01%1100.00%80.00%560.00%DAEWOO10.00%20.00%2JLR Group1820.54%199-8.54%1,5070.73%1,3719.92%Jaguar1170.34%127-7.87%7770.38%808-3.84%Land Rover650.19%72-9.72%7300.35%56329.66%Honda1100.32%101000.00%8000.39%72310.65%Lotus310.09%1963.16%2160.10%226-4.42%Mitsubishi30.01%19-84.21%1010.05%148-31.76%Aston Martin80.02%13-38.46%1000.05%8419.05%Hyundai120.04%26-53.85%680.03%182-62.64%Saab70.02%1600.00%490.02%4119.51%Rover30.01%10-70.00%320.02%47-31.91%Morgan30.01%3130.01%1118.18%MG10.00%2-50.00%70.00%616.67%Detomaso10.00%30.00%1200.00%Pontiac180.00%633.33%GMDAT140.00%5-20.00%Unimog40.00%Kia30.00%250.00%Autobianchi20.00%1100.00%Mini10.00%2-50.00%Opel10.00%4-75.00%Saturn10.00%2-50.00%Subaru1-100.00%Others80.023266.7520.034515.56%Total33,980100.0030,004113.3206,648100.00168,687122.5

Source: Japan Automobile Importers Association

What do we see? As long as I can remember, Volkswagen had been the largest importer to Japan. This year, only by cumulating all brands of the Volkswagen Group could we defend that honor. On a single brand basis, Nissan would be the largest importer to Japan. Next in line are the usual suspects BMW and Daimler, followed way back in the field by a motley crew of Fiat-Chrysler brands. And what’s next? Toyota already imports the same amount as all Fiat-Chrysler brands. Ford and GM are way back in the field.

Imagine: Little Porsche sells more cars in Japan than Ford and all of GM. The reason for the low sales of U.S. cars in Japan is simple: People want imported cars alright. People just don’t get excited about American cars. Fiat’s stepchild Alfa Romeo sells better than the bestselling GM brand, the Cadillac.

Now look at the growth rates of cars that sell in appreciable numbers. The Germans are not growing by much. What is really growing are – Japanese imports! Nissan already imported nearly three times as many cars for the year than in the same period of 2010. Toyota is stepping up imports also. In the preceding year, Toyota imported 10,000 units per annum. This year, the 10,000 mark was already reached in September. Already, 27 percent of the cars imported to Japan are Japanese brands.

If the yen remains strong, expect this trend to continue.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 36 comments
  • Damikco Damikco on Oct 31, 2011

    400k cars is not an open market at all

    • Eldard Eldard on Oct 31, 2011

      It's a wise market. Whereas areas where GM dominates are unsophisticated markets like LatAm and China or in NorthAm's case, a delusional market. lolz

  • Dodgeowner Dodgeowner on Jan 28, 2012

    This article is does not tell the entire story of why American or European imports make up such a small percentage of the Japanese and Korean home markets. Just read a few sentence below and then check the other article as see “What the truth about cars” is Steve Biegun, a strategist for Ford, during a lecture in 2007 stated this about Ford’s attempts to break into the Korean car market * Ford was barred from airing advertising commercials except between 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. * Its showrooms’ floor space was restricted by government regulation. * Korean tax officials automatically audited anyone who bought a foreign car The tax audit tactic was copied from the Japanese. The Japanese also adjusted emission requirements, as needed, to block entry of foreign car makers, changing the requirements, while shipments of cars were in transit, so that they would not meet emissions specific ions upon arrival. What cars are allowed in are the more expensive luxury ones, the cars that don’t compete against the cars of the masses. For example the #1 selling car in Korea for 2011 was the Mercedes E300 CDi at just over 7,000 sold in a market of 1,484,082 cars sold or in other words a ratio of 7:1484 and that is the biggest selling imported car, the rest have numbers smaller than that. What about the closed parts industry in Japan, while there maybe a bias against foreign cars, a light bulb is a light bulb, a wiper blade is a wiper blade, show me a foreign parts suppliers not tied to a Japanese car maker that sells in Japan. If you doubt these words, to go this web site and see for yourself http://counterpunch.org/2009/07/03/detroit-s-collapse-the-untold-story/

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next