What's Wrong With This Picture: I Want To Believe Edition

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: August 4th, 2010

what s wrong with this picture i want to believe edition

Just because I want to believe doesn’t mean I should. Or that I can. Even by the gonzo standards of 1970s Italy, the Stratos was always a wild one… precisely the kind of car that has no obvious place in the homogenized, safety-crazed world of 21st Century automobiles. Besides, Lancia and Chrysler are becoming two names for the same brand, and it’s tough to imagine a Chrysler Stratos ever coming stateside (if only to avoid the “Cloud Car” associations). Besides, if Fiat is keeping Alfa around as a sporty brand, why would it develop a Lancia sportscar? Other than Old GM-style branding confusion, of course. But the least believable part of these pictures, purportedly showing a Stratos prototype testing at a Fiat test track [via Italiaspeed] are the photos themselves… and the story going along with them.

Though a good source for Italian car news, Italiaspeed has something of a soft spot for the Fiat Group, and its apparent “exclusive” is a bit fishy. As is the story it tells about them.

The two ‘spy’ photographs were taken at the Fiat Group test track at Balocco near Milan on June 21 when this prototype was undergoing secret testing. Very little is known about the ambitious project but Italiaspeed has learnt that it has in fact been privately funded by a European industrialist. The trademark sloping bonnet betrays a badge recess that is of a very similar shape to Lancia’s traditional emblem meaning this new sports car could well be set to carry the famous marque’s name once again, which will raise the hope of Lancisti across the world, as is the fact that it has been in test action at Balocco.

Privately funded by a mysterious industrialist? Last we heard, Lancia boss Olivier Francoise was begging Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne to approve a new Stratos for his struggling brand. And given that Fiat has three sporting brands not counting Lancia, Sergio “industrial logic” Marchionne isn’t likely to approve a bespoke, mid-engined replica of a notoriously hard-to-drive cult car from the 1970s. Unless of course, a well-placed “spy shot” were able to inspire the Lancia legions to rise up and demand it.

And then there’s the pictures themselves. They look overly “spy-ish,” and yet have perfect angles on the car. And to this blogger, the second image looks remarkably computer-rendered. Together, they remind me of nothing so much as the infamous “Porsche Cayman Shooting Brake” hoax that exploited the enthusiastic optimism of several large car blogs. If I’m wrong, well, the world will have a new Stratos, and I’ll have no complaints. At this point though, I just can’t believe.

#3WTP #Design #Enthusiasm #FutureVehicles

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 21 comments

PeriSoft on Aug 04, 2010

Is there any problem with current vehicle design which can't be blamed on safety?

Like Reply
Kristjan Ambroz on Aug 05, 2010

OK, here's the deal. Lancia currently cannot do another Stratos, as they no longer have the rights to the name - those were bought by Austrian car designer (and Stratos fan) Hrabalek. He also presented several concepts (pretty much the same as the car in the picture) of an updated one, IIRC in 2005 or so. The idea behind it is to make a supercar for third world countries, where roads are much worse but there is a client base with money, who'd like to hoon irrespective. At the time Hrabalek hoped to secure the rights to the V8 out of the Ferrari 360 to power it and the suspension settings were to be somewhere between tarmac and gravel (raised ride height, very robust components both thrown in). The car seen testing is most likely a result of that - if Fiat actually decides to buy up the whole program and bring it back in house I do not know, though.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)