Oshawa Camaro Production Ceases November 20, Reduced To Three Shifts

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

First announced December 19, 2012, GM Canada’s Oshawa Assembly facility will officially cease production of the Camaro on November 20, 2015 in conjunction with the car’s next generation, GM announced today. Camaro production remained at the Oshawa plant a year longer than initially promised in 2012.

Assembly shifts will be reduced from four to three between the “Flex” and “Consolidated” lines. Currently, the “Flex” line is on three shifts while the smaller line is on one shift. GM Canada will “begin a voluntary retirement canvass” to reduce worker head count before implementing any layoffs. GM Canada President, Stephen K. Carlisle, stated “60 percent of our hourly workforce are nearing retirement” age and the company will offer incentives to eligible employees looking to retire early.

Chevrolet Impala, Buick Regal and Cadillac XTS production will continue on the “Flex” line for now. Regal production is scheduled to move to Germany by 2017 while the XTS will be discontinued at the end of its lifecycle in 2019. Both the XTS and Impala are also produced in Michigan. The “Consolidated” line currently builds the Impala Limited – a previous-generation W-body sedan – and the Chevrolet Equinox, the latter which is also produced in Ingersoll, Ontario.

GM Canada and Unifor are working together to “examine a range of longer-term opportunities and competitiveness enhancements for Oshawa Assembly,” stated the release today. The future of Oshawa will be announced after Unifor national bargaining next year.

On the same day, GM also announced $5.4b in investments aimed at the company’s Pontiac, Lansing, and Warren, Michigan facilities.

The announcement comes after GM Canada committed $800m to Ingersoll and another 100 jobs toward expanding connected car and green technology development at GM Canada’s Oshawa Engineering Centre.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 7 comments
  • Danio3834 Danio3834 on May 01, 2015

    No one is surprised. There's little reason to expand in Ontario, and ever more reasons to leave.

    • Psarhjinian Psarhjinian on May 01, 2015

      Ford and Chrysler expanded production, though Chrysler was admittedly a near thing and depends on FCA's commitment to the minivan market. Honda expanded. Toyota did just move Corolla production out of Cambridge, but they'll be picking up high-value work to replace it, so there's no lost jobs. It also opened Woodstock a few years ago. I'd say this isn't really a problem with Ontario and more an issue with GM's production planning.

  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on May 01, 2015

    A number of factors negatively impacting D3 manufacturing in Ontario. The first was Bob White's enormous ego. In the mid to late 80's when he removed the Canadian autoworkers from the UAW and formed the CAW he never considered the long term consequences. Once NAFTA replaced the US-Canada Auto Pact, American and Canadian autoworkers were competing for jobs. Therefore the UAW was petitioning US politicians to move production to their facilities. Killing Canadian jobs didn't matter to American politicians. Just like British politicians could use colonial troops in suicidal situations with little repercussion during the World Wars. The Ontario government compounded the problem with its ludicrous and onerous electricity programs. There is no way that the cost of electricity should be so high in Ontario. Their refusal to invest in infrastructure also means that the highways between Ontario and the U.S. are now congested adding to fuel costs and transport time. Finally once the D3 were able to 'offload' much of the cost for medical care/coverage from their retirees and new hires, their costs were reduced dramatically. Not having to provide medical coverage in Ontario, due to universal healthcare, was a significant cost savings for employers in Ontario. So once again politics and cost trump quality and loyalty.

  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
  • Crown No surprise there. The toxic chemical stew of outgassing.
  • Spamvw Seeing the gear indicator made me wonder when PRNDL was mandated.Anyone?Anyone?1971
Next