The DOJ Thinks Apple CarPlay is Bad for Consumers and the Industry

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

A significant percentage of new car buyers want Apple CarPlay in their next vehicle, but that popularity has the government on high alert. As part of its recent antitrust lawsuit against the tech giant, the U.S. Department of Justice listed CarPlay, saying that it stifled the development of technologies that could work with a phone while residing in the vehicle’s interface.


The lawsuit reads, “By applying the same playbook of restrictions to CarPlay, Apple further locks-in the power of the iPhone by preventing the development of other disintermediating technologies that interoperate with the phone but reside off device.” All of this comes as Apple looks to expand CarPlay’s influence over in-vehicle infotainment to include climate controls and other functions, which is part of the DOJ’s issue.


Automakers have a choice about how immersive they let Apple make the experience, so it’s not like the company is holding OEMs hostage to cover every screen inside a vehicle. Also, while many people have smartphones, car companies can’t assume that everyone does, so new vehicles still have to create usable, intuitive software to control vehicle functions.


The DOJ also took issue with Apple’s control over the Wallet app, saying that “The default status of Apple Wallet steers users to the Apple Wallet rather than allowing third parties to present digital car keys only in their own cross-platform app, increasing dependence on Apple and the iPhone whenever they use their car.” Companies like Rivian and Tesla don’t offer Apple tech, but General Motors recently stopped including smartphone mirroring in its new electric vehicles. The automaker’s tech almost immediately started having problems, leading to a stop-sale for the Chevy Blazer EV and financial compensation for some buyers.


[Image: Chinnapong via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 37 comments
  • Lichtronamo Lichtronamo on Mar 25, 2024

    You know why Apple and Android are so popular? Because they work... Automakers would be better off contracting with them (or Google) to develop their interfaces because the in-house efforts never seem to work as well.

    • See 2 previous
    • Naf65767183 Naf65767183 on Apr 15, 2024

      @Lichtronamo: Android is by Google/Alphabet. ie, Android is to Google/Alphabet as CarPlay is to Apple.


  • Wolfwagen Wolfwagen on Mar 25, 2024

    The DOJ has become a joke.

    Targeting parents voicing Concerns at School Board meetings? Check.

    Arresting An Anti-Abortion protester (in full military gear) for pushing a pro-abortion advocate for lying hands on the AA protestor's child? Check.

    Ignoring information about a politician and his son in an influence-pedaling scam? Check. Ignoring Drug and Child trafficking? Check.

    Worried about Company that has a superior product that attracts buyers? Check.


    Thank God Merrick Garland did become a member of SCOTUS.

  • 2ACL I have a soft spot for high-performance, shark-nosed Lancers (I considered the less-potent Ralliart during the period in which I eventually selected my first TL SH-AWD), but it's can be challenging to find a specimen that doesn't exhibit signs of abuse, and while most of the components are sufficiently universal in their function to service without manufacturer support, the SST isn't one of them. The shops that specialize in it are familiar with the failure as described by the seller and thus might be able to fix this one at a substantial savings to replacement. There's only a handful of them in the nation, however. A salvaged unit is another option, but the usual risks are magnified by similar logistical challenges to trying to save the original.I hope this is a case of the seller overvaluing the Evo market rather than still owing or having put the mods on credit. Because the best offer won't be anywhere near the current listing.
  • Peter Buying an EV from Toyota is like buying a Bible from Donald Trump. Don’t be surprised if some very important parts are left out.
  • Sheila I have a 2016 Kia Sorento that just threw a rod out of the engine case. Filed a claim for new engine and was denied…..due to a loop hole that was included in the Class Action Engine Settlement so Hyundai and Kia would be able to deny a large percentage of cars with prematurely failed engines. It’s called the KSDS Improvement Campaign. Ever hear of such a thing? It’s not even a Recall, although they know these engines are very dangerous. As unknowing consumers load themselves and kids in them everyday. Are their any new Class Action Lawsuits that anyone knows of?
  • Alan Well, it will take 30 years to fix Nissan up after the Renault Alliance reduced Nissan to a paltry mess.I think Nissan will eventually improve.
  • Alan This will be overpriced for what it offers.I think the "Western" auto manufacturers rip off the consumer with the Thai and Chinese made vehicles.A Chinese made Model 3 in Australia is over $70k AUD(for 1995 $45k USD) which is far more expensive than a similar Chinesium EV of equal or better quality and loaded with goodies.Chinese pickups are $20k to $30k cheaper than Thai built pickups from Ford and the Japanese brands. Who's ripping who off?
Next