Rare Rides Icons: The Cadillac Eldorado, Distinctly Luxurious (Part XIV)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

As we learned in our previous installment, the third generation Eldorado debuted in 1957 with a daring new X-frame chassis design. Launched across the entire Cadillac lineup that year, the X-frame would become controversial in short order due to safety concerns in side-impact crashes. Up top, Cadillac decided to make less controversial styling changes on the 1957 Eldorados. Designers advanced a styling theme that would reach its fin-happy and chrome bedazzled crescendo a couple of years later.

(Note: The teal Eldorado pictured is the 1956, while the mist green example is a 1957.)

The 1957 Cadillacs were a notable step away from the bathtub-shaped post-WWII domestic full-size designs with their towering hoods, bulbous fenders, and generally skirted wheels. The prow of the USS Eldorado was much lower than before, both in design and in ride height. GM would thank the X-frame for part of that height reduction.

A new hood design was nearly parallel to the headlamps in 1957, contrasted sharply to the prominent raised hood the prior year. Dual finned hood ornaments complete with their own chrome spears went by the wayside; an unadorned power bulge remained. The Cadillac crest and accompanying V were slightly smaller in 1957, proportionally adjusted in light of the smaller vertical surface area at the edge of the hood. 

Dagmars were once again relocated, as the surgeon shifted them yearly to find the optimal location. Moved upward and inward, they were also smaller than ever before and capped with rubber nipples. Safety nipples you might say, as they were deformable. Rather than being inset into the grille, the Dagmars were now a part of its perimeter. Located just under the hood line, they were joined by a thick chrome bar that wrapped around the front end.


The grille itself wore a larger egg crate design in 1957, and was no longer bisected in the middle by a horizontal chrome strip. Newly finished in gold, it came to a softer point in the middle than in 1956. At either side of the lower valence were new dual driving and indicator lamps. Each of the four were perched on their own jet engine like protrusion, and looked overworked compared to the simple rectangular lamp the prior year. 

Above the bumper was a new ribbed metal trim detail that wrapped around the front end on either side. The ‘57-only single headlamp clusters were still ringed in chrome, but had a softer metal awning over them than in 1956. In contrast, the fender was still rounded but more defined in its shape, with a newly extended character line that proceeded over halfway into the door. 


Below the character line was a front wheel that was fully exposed as Cadillac ditched the skirted wheel of the past few years. The wheel arch tapered rearward lazily, and showed a side profile with no chrome detailing along its flanks. The “saddle” ribbed chrome along the window sill was no more, and the body chrome that ran from the bumper to aft of the door before ending in vent detailing was gone too.

Relocated and refined, the Cadillac crest and Eldorado script previously on the fender near the door now appeared at the front edge of the fender sans crest. The lettering now read the trim, Biarritz or Seville, rather than Eldorado. 

Hood ventilation grilles were separated from the windshield in 1957, and moved into the cowl. The vents were also lower profile and not as noticeable when the Eldorado was viewed head-on. Above the vents was a much more curvaceous windshield that was less upright. Lending to a sportier appearance, the wrap-around glass also extended further than in 1956, going several inches past the door shut line (DLO). 


Aft of the door, rear fenders were smoother but picked up more chrome trim. The skirted rear wheel was a bit less skirted than in 1956, and the tubular protrusion in the fin that previously terminated at the rear lamps was gone. Instead, a thick chrome band originated from ahead of the wheel, curved up and around the wheel arch, and headed straight rearward. Beneath this trim piece was a chromed panel that wrapped the lower portion of the wheel arch and molded into the bumper’s shape.

Above the chrome additions were Cadillac’s signature fins, which were shorter than before but also sharper. They extended from the rear fender more rapidly, and were thinner and more defined in their shape. Fins were most striking because of the revised shape of the Eldorado’s rear end.


The trunk itself was more flush to the fenders, and no longer sported a “luggage” style bulge that cars wore between the Thirties and Fifties. The trunk lid was organic in its shape, and blended nearly seamlessly into the rear end. Eldorado block lettering in gold was joined by the Cadillac V on the trunk lid, just as it did previously.

Rear lamps no longer appeared on rocket-like pods, but were integrated with simple chrome bezels just under the tail lamps. The ribbed bumper of 1956 with its exhaust protrusions was revised into a simpler arrangement, with a circular reverse lamp either side, and a dual exhaust which matched the reversing lamp in size. 


For the first time the rear bumper was two separate segments, which wrapped only a quarter of the way into the rear at either side. In the middle there was painted metal, with a chromed surround for the license plate. Compared to 1956, the 1957 Eldorado’s rear end was a celebration of lightweight simplicity. 


To close us out today, take the rear end design a step further and mentally erase the rear’s fins. What you’re left with is a nearly European looking design! In our next installment, we’ll cover the hardtop roof design changes which were exclusive to the Eldorado Seville. Then we’ll review the exterior styling of the hand-built Series 70 Eldorado Brougham.


[Images: BaT, seller]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 23 comments
  • Craiger Craiger on Jan 29, 2024

    What is a "bower bulge?" I'm guessing that's just the usual typo that we've come to expect at TTAC.

    • See 1 previous
    • Craiger Craiger on Feb 03, 2024

      Well somebody has to do the proofreading.


      You need me on that wall. You want me on that wall.





  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Jan 29, 2024

    Why are these columns posted late on Fridays when they get the least number of views/replies? Please post them at a more advantageous time as they are perhaps the best content on this site.


    I do like the the rear bumper and rear exhaust treatments on the vehicle in the last picture. However the front end of the vehicle in the first picture is too reminiscent of Chevrolets of that era. And the fins on all of these vehicles are not flamboyant or aggressive enough. If you are going to have fins, either have them small and 'tasteful' or outrageously large. These are neither.


    Sorry that I cannot differentiate between mint green and teal and other similar colours. As an old guy I have been trained to only see/speak in primary colours.

    • See 1 previous
    • Jeff Jeff on Jan 29, 2024

      Arthur--The 59 Cadillac Eldorado Biarritz that you like with is big tail fins was a total new design in response to the 57 Chryslers. GM's original plans for the 59s were the 58s with a few changes.


  • Redapple2 I gave up on Honda. My 09 Accord Vs my 03. The 09s- V 6 had a slight shudder when deactivating cylinders. And the 09 did not have the 03 's electro luminescent gages. And the 09 had the most uncomfortable seats. My brother bought his 3rd and last Honda CRV. Brutal seats after 25 minutes. NOW, We are forever Toyota, Lexus, Subaru people now despite HAVING ACCESS TO gm EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT. Despite having access to the gm employee discount. Man, that is a massive statement. Wow that s bad - Under no circumstances will I have that govna crap.
  • Redapple2 Front tag obscured. Rear tag - clear and sharp. Huh?
  • Redapple2 I can state what NOT to buy. HK. High theft. Insurance. Unrefined NVH. Rapidly degrading interiors. HK? No way !
  • Luke42 Serious answer:Now that I DD an EV, buying an EV to replace my wife’s Honda Civic is in the queue. My wife likes her Honda, she likes Apple CarPlay, and she can’t stand Elon Musk - so Tesla starts the competition with two demerit-points and Honda starts the competition with one merit-point.The Honda Prologue looked like a great candidate until Honda announced that the partnership with GM was a one-off thing and that their future EVs would be designed in-house.Now I’m more inclined toward the Blazer EV, the vehicle on which the Prologue is based. The Blazer EV and the Ultium platform won’t be orphaned by GM any time soon. But then I have to convince my wife she would like it better than her Honda Civic, and that’s a heavy lift because she doesn’t have any reason to be dissatisfied with her current car (I take care of all of the ICE-hassles for her).Since my wife’s Honda Civic is holding up well, since she likes the car, and since I take care of most of the drawbacks of drawbacks of ICE ownership for her, there’s no urgency to replace this vehicle.Honestly, if a paid-off Honda Civic is my wife’s automotive hill to die on, that’s a pretty good place to be - even though I personally have to continue dealing the hassles and expenses of ICE ownership on her behalf.My plan is simply to wait-and-see what Honda does next. Maybe they’ll introduce the perfect EV for her one day, and I’ll just go buy it.
  • 2ACL I have a soft spot for high-performance, shark-nosed Lancers (I considered the less-potent Ralliart during the period in which I eventually selected my first TL SH-AWD), but it's can be challenging to find a specimen that doesn't exhibit signs of abuse, and while most of the components are sufficiently universal in their function to service without manufacturer support, the SST isn't one of them. The shops that specialize in it are familiar with the failure as described by the seller and thus might be able to fix this one at a substantial savings to replacement. There's only a handful of them in the nation, however. A salvaged unit is another option, but the usual risks are magnified by similar logistical challenges to trying to save the original.I hope this is a case of the seller overvaluing the Evo market rather than still owing or having put the mods on credit. Because the best offer won't be anywhere near the current listing.
Next