Daimler Doubling Down On Maybach

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

It’s been a short, strange trip for Maybach, as Daimler’s über-luxe branding effort went from toast of the nouveau riche to played-out self-caricature in a few short years. Needless to say, TTAC has been awaiting the long-overdue death of that brand for some time now, only to be stymied by a “final” facelift and a Xenatec-developed Coupe. Now, with Aston Martin reportedly working on the new look of the brand that “nobody at Daimler wants to let die,” Maybach’s masters are finally admitting to the fact that TTAC pointed out back in 2007: The Super S-Class was “born old hat.” Autocar reports:

Originally created to be profitable at 800 cars per year, Maybach has regularly struggled to sell half that annually since the launch of the 57 and 62 in 2002. Insiders now admit the decision to base the Maybach on the platform of a two-generations-old S-class, the W140, was a mistake.

Doing so prevented Mercedes from updating the upmarket limousine’s standard features with new navigation, communication and entertainment systems, as well as new safety features owing to an incompatible electronics platform dating back to 1990.

D’oh! But don’t worry… this won’t happen again. Honest.

According to the British buff book, the new Maybach lineup of long- and Venti-wheelbased luxury sedans will debut in 2014

based on a modified version of the next-generation S-class’s contemporary rear-wheel drive underpinnings and electronics platform.

That S-Class will launch in 2013, which means it will be only one year old when the Maybach versions debut. That, along with huge strides in electronics systems, should make the next generation of Maybachs more enduring than the previous generation… but bringing the brand back is still far from a no-brainer. After all, it’s not as if there’s a huge amount of equity left in the brand built on a platform that was replaced 11 years ago. Moreover, Aston’s designers will have to do a far better job differentiating the ‘bach from its S-Class donor than the first generation’s designers did. And on that front, Autocar’s report that

the new Maybach is set to boast a “traditional three-box design”, in line with buyer tastes

is hardly encouraging. Wasn’t the first generation “conservative” enough? Who wants to bet that, between the 2014 launch of the new Maybachs and the 2016 launch of the next Rolls-Royce Phantom, the Goodwood Giant won’t continue to crush its German-branded rival?

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 26 comments
  • Jimboy Jimboy on Jan 20, 2011

    Isn't the new S-class based on the new 300 platform? That would make the Maybach an Imperial LOL!

    • See 2 previous
    • Jimboy Jimboy on Jan 26, 2011

      @dubvbenz, How do you know that? It's common knowledge that DCX co-developed platforms for both the Grand Cherokee/ML models and that they were developing a SHARED platform for the next E- class size. At Chrysler this resulted in the NEW 'LY' platform, which underpins the 300, and was slated to be the basis of a new Mercedes model. So, unless you're a Mercedes engineer and can prove me wrong, I'm closer to the truth than you are. I'm sorry you Daimler fan boys have a hard time with that, but the truth is Mercedes engineers are not the only ones who can develop outstanding vehicles. P.S. the previous gen 'LX' also was NOT a W-210, but based some of its component design on that model. Please check your facts before you get all huffy here.

  • Daniel de la Cruz Daniel de la Cruz on May 14, 2011

    "Insiders now admit the decision to base the Maybach on the platform of a two-generations-old S-class, the W140, was a mistake. Doing so prevented Mercedes from updating the upmarket limousine’s standard features with new navigation, communication and entertainment systems, as well as new safety features owing to an incompatible electronics platform dating back to 1990." That doesnt make sense. The Maybach used the W140 chassis, but its components are derived from the W220 (which debut in 1998) The so-called insiders dont know **** about the car. Have they seen the interior of a Maybach? Theres nothing 1990's about it. The reason Maybach failed is because of its pricing. While Maybach certainly had brand presence, a Rolls Royce was considerably cheaper and is also an established marque so most cash strapped individuals just opted for this. I would love to find out who these so called "insiders" are. Seems more like a bunch of idiots jumping to their own conclusions.

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next