Stuff We Use: Smoked Side Markers

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

On our never-ending quest to improve this place by listening to feedback from the B&B, we are taking a new tack with these product posts, choosing instead to focus on items we use and have purchased with our own meager income. After all, if we’re giving you the truth about cars, we ought to give you the truth about car accessories.

This one’s a little bit different than some of the other Stuff We Use missives which pass through our domain name twice a month. Instead of a universal product like battery boosters or jack stands, we’ll walk ya through the installation of an accessory placed on one of our cars just the other week.

Styling is a perpetually subjective thing, with some of us preferring a completely standard look to our hoopties while others enjoy something that’s just a little bit different than what’s available on the showroom floor. The writer is definitely in the latter camp, though only to a point. You won’t find stick-on chrome from Manny, Moe, & Jack on any of my whips, nor will the make or model be emblazoned on the windshield in foot-high stickers. If something I’ve added (or removed) from my car makes onlookers question if it rolled out of the factory that way, all the better.

First, a dose of history. Back in 1968, federal regulators decreed that new cars on our nation’s roads must abide by a new requirement for side-marker lights, appearing as amber colored lamps up front and red ones for the rear. This caused consternation in design studios, since adding these markers to some cars of the day was akin to taking a Sharpie to the Mona Lisa. Ok, that’s being a bit dramatic – but the point stands.

Some brands tried to stick it to The Man by only adhering to the letter of the law, begrudgingly placing the tiniest of amber/red side markers on their cars. The 1968 Dodge Charger is a perfect example of this thumb-in-the-eye to government. Still, someone in Washington must have twisted some arms (or at least defined a minimum number of square inches for side markers) because check out the amber/red honkers on the Charger just one model year later.

These days, modern LED technology makes it easy to incorporate these federally mandated units into a car’s design, with creative ideas cropping up like kudzu. Some modern machines, like the post-facelift Dodge Charger, did a respectable job of incorporating the illumination into its styling cues by having them trace the outline of front and rear wheel arches. But yer author’s five-year-old Dodge Challenger never received such a treatment, leaving what amounts to a set of amber and yellow popsicle sticks glued to the side of his car.

Enter the smoked lenses cribbed off the internet. Available from common sources like Amazon or eBay Motors, these things are intended to rid my car of the side marker scourge and blend in much more seamlessly with the Pitch Black paintwork. They arrived decently quickly through regular mail, showing up in a box that had been wrapped several times in plastic to discourage theft, a sadly prevalent occurrence in your humble author’s experience with envelopes arriving ripped asunder and magazines shredded beyond readability. This is not an issue with couriers in our area.

Anyway, installing these lights couldn’t have been easier. Gone are the days of my father’s 1978 Blazer whose side markers were affixed with exposed silver Phillips head screws, replaced with far more discreet clips on the lights’ anterior sides. Simply sliding under the Challenger was enough to find the clips for its rear lights, requiring an easy push on its fore fastener which permitted the rear fastener to slide right out. All that remained was unplugging the light from its factory harness, a task slightly easier said than done thanks to five years of accumulated road grime.

With the factory light removed, installation – as they used to say in Chilton’s manuals – was reverse of the removal. Not s single tool was required to make this upgrade, a delight in this modern age where some cars require the disassembly of their front fascias in order to replace a headlight bulb. The aftermarket lamp appears completely black when off, shining a bright red when illuminated. We’ve all seen aftermarket LED stuff go dim after a few months of use, so I’ll be keeping an eye on these things for any shenanigans. All’s well so far.

Up front on the Challenger, removal of the factory lights was equally simple – on the passenger side. Reaching down through the engine compartment to that side’s lamp and pushing out the fasteners was as easy as it was on the car’s aft quarters, but the driver side required removing the cone air filter and sticking my arm down through the intake box. This took but a moment of logical thought, though I am confident there are ample numbers of YouTube tutorials on this topic. The fasteners on this final lamp were easy to manipulate once I snaked my arm down through the intake and around to the back of its front fender.

So far, I give this upgrade full marks for ease of installation and satisfaction with results. Take that, regulators of 1968!

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Join the conversation
3 of 10 comments
  • JMII JMII on Apr 25, 2024

    I did them on my C7 because somehow GM managed to build LED markers that fail after only 6 years. These are brighter then OEM despite the smoke tint look.

    I got them here:

    • Redapple2 Redapple2 on Apr 26, 2024

      ..................GM managed to build LED markers that fail after only 6 years. 1) GM is spelled gm. (they think little of themselves.) 2) Corvette is one of the very few - good ones. The rest is vile rubbish. IE- Silverado is widely considered 4th best truck. (or near the bottom) Wise people would ask -- why near the worst in pickups?. I mean pick up sales + Tahoe, they must be making more than 2x as many as Ford of the super profitable trucks at $20,000 profit each. You d think they have enough $ left over to design a decent pick up. BINGO !!! They think their customers are stupid. It s a Rotted company. Evil gm Vampire.

  • Zerofoo Zerofoo on Apr 26, 2024

    Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.

  • 3-On-The-Tree I don’t think Toyotas going down.
  • ToolGuy Random thoughts (bulleted list because it should work on this page):• Carlos Tavares is a very smart individual.• I get the sense that the western hemisphere portion of Stellantis was even more messed up than he originally believed (I have no data), which is why the plan (old plan, original plan) has taken longer than expected (longer than I expected).• All the OEMs who have taken a serious look at what is happening with EVs in China have had to take a step back and reassess (oversimplification: they were thinking mostly business-as-usual with some tweaks here and there, and now realize they have bigger issues, much bigger, really big).• You (dear TTAC reader) aren't ready to hear this yet, but the EV thing is a tsunami (the thing has already done the thing, just hasn't reached you yet). I hesitate to even tell you, but it is the truth.
  • ToolGuy ¶ I have kicked around doing an engine rebuild at some point (I never have on an automobile); right now my interest level in that is pretty low, say 2/5.¶ It could be interesting to do an engine swap at some point (also haven't done that), call that 2/5 as well.¶ Building a kit car would be interesting but a big commitment, let's say 1/5 realistically.¶ Frame-up restoration, very little interest, 1/5.¶ I have repainted a vehicle (down to bare metal) and that was interesting/engaging (didn't have the right facilities, but made it work, sort of lol).¶ Taking a vehicle which I like where the ICE has given out and converting it to EV sounds engaging and appealing. Would not do it anytime soon, maybe 3 to 5 years out. Current interest level 4/5.¶ Building my own car (from scratch) would have some significant hurdles. Unless I started my own car company, which might involve other hurdles. 😉
  • Rover Sig "Value" is what people perceive as its worth. What is the worth or value of an EV somebody creates out of a used car? People value different things, but for a vehicle, people generally ascribe worth in terms of reliability, maintainability, safety, appearance and style, utility (payload, range, etc.), convenience, operating cost, projected life, support network, etc. "Value for money" means how much worth would people think it had compared to competing vehicles on the market, in other words, would it be a good deal to buy one, compared to other vehicles one could get? Consider what price you would have to ask for it, including the parts and labor you put into it, because that would affect the “for the money” part of the “value for money” calculation. An indicator of whether people think an EV-built-in-a-used-car would provide "value for money" is the current level of demand for used cars turned into EVs. Are there a lot of people looking for these on the market? Or would building one just be a hobby? Repairing an existing EV, bringing it back into spec, might create better value for the money. Although demand for EVs is reportedly down recently.
  • ToolGuy Those of you who aren't listening to the TTAC Podcast, you really don't know what you are missing.