As Ford Grapples With 2020 Explorer and Lincoln Aviator Issues, One Reader Doesn't Like What He Discovered

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

You read all about Ford’s midsize crossover issues last week, perhaps with great dismay. According to an extensive report, serious and sometimes hazy quality defects have kept thousands of 2020 Ford Explorers and Lincoln Aviators away from dealer lots.

It seems the automaker is hauling vehicles directly from Chicago Assembly to a hastily-arranged fix-it space at Flat Rock Assembly in Michigan — a stopover for quality control and repair on the way to the dealer. Some vehicles reportedly wait up to a month for a fix.

Bad news for Ford, but is it also bad news for those awaiting these two critically important models? Surely having these issues remedied before delivery to dealer lots is better than no fix at all? Certainly, it’s a better outcome for the automaker and buyer than the alternative. And yet, after visiting his local Ford dealer, one reader walked away shaking his head.

TTAC reader Mike Freed stopped at a Ford store to take a gander at a new Aviator on Friday, only to leave disappointed in the perceived quality of Lincoln’s elegantly-styled midsizer. Isolated example or an indication that quality’s not up to snuff in Chicago? A wider pool of subjects is required. All we can tell you, with pictures, is what our photog friend discovered in a walkaround of a 2020 Aviator.

The list of obvious flaws was extensive, and would be cause for concern had they appeared on a vehicle costing half as much (Aviators start a tick above $51k USD). A misaligned door that looked like it came out of Oakville Assembly (anyone who’s ever looked at the rear doors of an Edge or Nautilus know what we mean). Poorly-adhered side trim that could be lifted with the gentle touch of a finger. Wonky B-pillar panels. An ill-fitting liftgate. A rear corner window pushed out at the top end. Plenty of orange peel in the paint.

Back up a dozen yards and this Aviator likely looks pristine, but premium car buyers tend to get much closer to their prospective rides before signing over sixty or seventy large. And, while the exterior flaws don’t necessarily speak to the quality of the interior (our reader did not enter the vehicle) or the drivetrain, it does whisper to a consumer that unseen trouble could lie in wait. Last week’s report did detail issues with the transmission, actually. Specifically, the unit’s difficulty in sensing when the vehicle in in “park.”

The Aviator and its Explorer platform mate are high-volume, generously priced vehicles that stand to make Ford a lot of money. The Aviator in particular is seen as Lincoln’s comeback vehicle — a model Dearborn hopes will cement the brand’s status in the premium field and compel Lexus and Audi buyers to reconsider their decision to turn away from domestic luxury. This is not a hastily-prepared entry-level model brought in from another market as a gap-filler or stepping stone.

One vehicle sitting on a lot does not a reputation make, but these photos, placed in the context of widely reported issues plaguing the company’s new crossovers, should serve as a red flag to company brass that something’s not right. A sign that they’ve failed to deliver what they promised. Even worse for Ford, it will be a red flag for buyers who wander into a dealer.

If Lincoln wants to beat foreign rivals at their own game, it has to boast comparable build quality, right down to the trim adhesion. Styling, technology, and power only goes far, as the Alfa Romeo saga aptly demonstrates.

[Image: Mike Freed, Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 101 comments
  • SuperCarEnthusiast SuperCarEnthusiast on Sep 25, 2019

    Wait for the all clear to come before buying the Explorer and Aviator! I was planning on buying the Aviator right now but will wait till Spring to see if anything is improved. However, I could save around $15K and go with the Hyundai Palisade.

  • CombiCoupe99 CombiCoupe99 on Oct 05, 2019

    I'll bet anything that the union guys are somehow going to blame corporate for this. They will tell you that they are being treated unfairly or that conditions are no good - thus justifying their poor workmanship. Get these jobs out of "victim territory" and send them to where folks want to do quality work.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next