Power Ranger: Ford Releases Specs for New Midsize Pickup
As the 2019 Ranger creeps closer to dealer lots, Ford has pulled back the curtain on the one remaining mystery surrounding the reborn midsize pickup: what to expect from its turbocharged 2.3-liter four-cylinder.
It’s the only engine available to Ranger buyers, and it’s mated solely to a 10-speed automatic. That’s five more speeds than one could get in the departing 2012 Ranger. Using the previous-gen model as a comparison, the four-cylinder 2019 Ranger makes nearly double the horsepower from the same displacement, and more than doubles the torque rating of its predecessor.
For this application, Ford didn’t endow the engine with quite the same output as the one found in the Mustang EcoBoost. The Ranger’s 2.3-liter makes 270 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque, which is a considerable leg up even from the previous-gen Ranger’s 4.0-liter V6. That mill made 207 hp and 238 lb-ft.
Going back 20 years, the 5.4-liter V8 found in the F-150 cranked out 220 hp and 290 lb-ft. Even the top-flight 5.4-liter V8 fell 10 hp short of the 2019 Ranger’s engine, though it bests the EcoBoost by 35 lb-ft. Direct injection and turbocharging truly works wonders.
The Blue Oval claims a towing capacity of 7,500 pounds when equipped with the optional tow package and trailer brake controller. Compared to the domestic competition, that’s 500 pounds more than a Chevrolet Colorado with the 3.6-liter V6, and 200 lbs less than a Duramax diesel model. Those two engines make 275 lb-ft and 369 lb-ft, respectively. A Toyota Tacoma V6 puts out 265 lb-ft.
Maximum payload for the Ranger is 1,860 pounds, which also tops offerings from GM and Toyota.
There’s still no word on what mill might power the off-road Ranger Raptor when it inevitably appears, but Ford still hasn’t officially announced the model for the American market. Maybe the Mustang EcoBoost’s 310 hp and 350 lb-ft could set up shop under the Ranger’s hood.
If the 2019 Ranger’s power sounds appealing, you’d best decide whether its price leaves you feeling just as good. Read about that here. Production kicks off later this year, with the Ranger making its way to dealers early next year.
[Image: Ford Motor Company]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- ToolGuy This thing here is interesting.For example, I can select "Historical" and "EV stock" and "Cars" and "USA" and see how many BEVs and PHEVs were on U.S. roads from 2010 to 2023."EV stock share" is also interesting. Or perhaps you prefer "EV sales share".If you are in the U.S., whatever you do, do not select "World" in the 'Region' dropdown. It might blow your small insular mind. 😉
- ToolGuy This podcast was pretty interesting. I listened to it this morning, and now I am commenting. Listened to the podcast, now commenting on the podcast. See how this works? LOL.
- VoGhost If you want this to succeed, enlarge the battery and make the vehicle in Spartanburg so you buyers get the $7,500 discount.
- Jeff Look at the the 65 and 66 Pontiacs some of the most beautiful and well made Pontiacs. 66 Olds Toronado and 67 Cadillac Eldorado were beautiful as well. Mercury had some really nice looking cars during the 60s as well. The 69 thru 72 Grand Prix were nice along with the first generation of Monte Carlo 70 thru 72. Midsize GM cars were nice as well.The 69s were still good but the cheapening started in 68. Even the 70s GMs were good but fit and finish took a dive especially the interiors with more plastics and more shared interiors.
- Proud2BUnion I typically recommend that no matter what make or model you purchase used, just assure that is HAS a prior salvage/rebuilt title. Best "Bang for your buck"!
Comments
Join the conversation
The new Ranger will have the potential to rein in not only GM's C twins, but the Tacoma. The Ranger in Australia has nearly equaled the Hilux. The Hilux is only in front due to fleet sales. Notice I stated "potential". The US Ranger needs a 2.5 gas and a small diesel along with single cabs. Single cabs will sell, especially with a long bed or tray back and a 2.5 base model.
I’d rather have a Ranger with the 3.3 v6 from the F150. I recently drove one of those and it was surprisingly nice. Smooth and responsive.