U.S. Midsize Pickup Truck Market Share Is at a Nine-Year High, Just In Time for a New Ford Ranger

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Just ahead of the launch of a new Ford Ranger, production of which began earlier this month, midsize trucks’ share of the overall U.S. pickup truck market is up to a respectable nine-year high.

Thanks to significant year-over-year improvements from the two top sellers in the segment plus meaningful increases from the third and fourth-ranked midsize pickups, category-wide volume has grown by more than 60,000 units during the first nine months of 2018. Compared with the same period in 2017, volume in the much larger full-size pickup truck segment hasn’t even grown by half that much.

If you’re a pickup truck buyer, you remain far more likely to acquire a full-size F-150, Silverado, Ram, Sierra, Tundra, or Titan than a Tacoma, Colorado, Frontier, Canyon, or Ridgeline. But the slice of the pie afforded to the five-strong midsize sector is above 18 percent for the first time since 2009.

Could the new Ford Ranger push midsize trucks over the one-fifth mark for the first time since 2006?

It certainly seems likely. Through the first three quarters of 2018, a mere 3,800 extra midsize pickup truck sales per month would be sufficient to drive the sub-sector’s share of the truck market above 20 percent, a tipping point that could give inactive manufacturers itchy feet.

For a reborn Ranger, 3,800 monthly sales seems an easy target despite the truck’s soaring MSRPs. (A base Ranger starts above $25K.) But where will the Ranger’s sales come from? After all, as Steph Willems already reported, Ford doesn’t believe the Ranger will steal customers away from the F-150. What the Ranger adds to the midsize sector it may simply be taking away from the Tacoma, Colorado, Canyon, Frontier, and Ridgeline.

The well from which the Ranger will draw remains to be fully understood. In the lead-up to the Ford’s arrival, however, it’s increasingly clear that Americans are steadily more interested in midsize trucks at large. Only a year ago, we noted the level at which midsize truck market share had plateaued. After perking up in 2016 with the arrival of a new Tacoma, U.S. midsize pickup truck market share declined in 2017, not a particularly welcome environment for the Ranger. Indeed, since the recession, the midsize sector’s share of the pickup truck market averaged just 14.2 percent, annually.

TruckOct. 2018 YTDOct. 2017 YTD% ChangeToyota Tacoma183,909147,42124.8%Chevrolet Colorado104,83883,03426.3%Nissan Frontier59,57455,2087.9%GMC Canyon25,27323,2698.6%Honda Ridgeline22,80426,576-14.2%————Total396,398335,50818.1%

2018 is telling a different story. With improved availability, Toyota Tacoma sales are booming. With one-quarter of 2018 remaining, Toyota has already reported more Tacoma sales than in any full calendar year prior to 2016. Toyota may well sell 250,000 Tacomas in America in 2018, having never topped 200,000 annual sales in the nameplate’s history.

At General Motors, where early forecasts suggested the Colorado and Canyon could combine for 100,000-130,000 annual sales, the Colorado alone has already generated more than 100,000 sales in 2018. And GM still has a quarter of the year – plus the Colorado’s twin – to count.

After suffering a noticeable decline in 2017, Nissan Frontier volume is once again on the rise. For just the second time since 2001, Nissan is on track for more than 80,000 Frontier sales in 2018. 2019 will be the current Frontier’s 15th model year.

Honda, meanwhile, plugs along with the second-generation Ridgeline, neither experiencing the highs nor the lows of the first-generation Ridgeline, at least not yet. 2018 will be just the second full year for the current Ridgeline. Incidentally, year No.2 for the first Ridgeline produced a 14.7-percent decline, very much in line with the decline experienced by the current Ridgeline in its second year.

The Ridgeline, of course, is the exception to the rule (in so many ways.) Midsize truck sales are rising fast even as full-size pickup truck momentum slows. After more than a decade of disappearances and disappointment, Americans will acquire substantially more than half a million non-full-size trucks in 2018, a feat not accomplished since 2007, when current nameplates battled with the Suzuki Equator, Mitsubishi Raider, Mazda B-Series, Isuzu i-Series, and Dodge Dakota.

Long may competition reign.

[Images: Ford, GM, Toyota]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Driving.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Oct 26, 2018

    People love pickups in 'murica and the Land of Oz. There's one thing I have noticed and I'll call it "Peak Pickup". Peak Pickup has nothing to do with quantity of pickups sold, but to do with capability. I think the US has reached and possibly exceeded Peak Pickup. There is a market for pickups that can tow huge loads. We have US pickups in Australia and people buy them as toys, to tow toys. We also have people who only need to tow tows that is just to large for a car to handle. The US is no different. I think the majority of daily driving pickup owners have little need to tow 10 000 or even 7 000lbs, like Australia, but, we do have people who want to tow that much. Now, comes along the global midsizer, a very capable vehicle for it's size rivalling half ton pickups in capability and exceeds them off road and is overall large enough for the average fat ass Aussie or 'murican and his obese wife and 1.643 children to go to the beach, camping, fishing and tow a boat, off roading, etc. Fortunately the 'murica doesn't get our midsizers that can tow nearly 8 000lbs and carry on average 2 500lbs or more. I think Peak Pickup Capability has reached it's limit for the average Joe and the new midsizer can do pretty much what an average 'murican half ton did a decade or so ago and do it cheaper. The new midsizers are not the midsizers or compact pickups of old, they are refined, have some decent grunt and are cheaper than a fullsize half ton to do the job, quite capably. (The new midsize will not overtake the 'murican half ton. 'murican half ton will only be challenged if cheap imports come into the US (ie, no chicken tax)).

  • Groovypippin Groovypippin on Oct 26, 2018

    In 1989 Mazda looked around and said, "Why is no one building an affordable, fun sports car?" The MX-5 was born. Someone in the industry should take a similar look around and ask, "Why is no one building an ACTUALLY compact, affordable, fuel efficient, inexpensive truck?". Here in Canada all these "mid-size" trucks start north of $30,000 and the ones people actually buy are north of $40,000. Crazy. Come on Mazda, do it again. Put the 2.5L normally aspirated SKYACTIV under the hood of a new B-Series truck that's compact, lightweight, offers a true base equipment package that Canadians can buy for $25,000 and Americans can buy for $3.74.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next