GM Could Stop Building Camaros for Six Months and It Still Wouldn't Run Out

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Well, that was short-lived. After somewhat positive, very incentive-fueled results for the Chevrolet Camaro in September and October, November’s numbers told a very different story.

General Motors’ underwhelming launch of the sixth-generation Chevrolet Camaro produced significantly fewer sales in 2016 than the old Camaro managed in its final year. Camaro sales through the first eight months of 2016 were down 15 percent, year-over-year. But GM then threw down the incentive gauntlet in September with massive discounts, intending to clear an inventory glut.

It worked. Sort of. The Chevrolet Camaro outsold the Ford Mustang in September — and again in October — but inventory levels scarcely decreased. Autumn simply isn’t the time to sell large numbers of pony cars, even if the Camaro attracted more buyers thanks to average discounts of $4,700 per car.

Regardless, that two-month Camaro win streak turned out to be a two-month blip. General Motors scaled back Camaro incentives in November 2016. Consequently, Camaro volume declined, the Camaro was once again handily outsold by the Ford Mustang, and there are now 177 days of Camaro supply across America.

From $4,700 per Camaro in October 2016, GM provided “just” $3,508 of discounts per Camaro in November 2016. As a result, GM reported only 4,893 total U.S. Camaro sales last month, an 8-percent year-over-year decrease and the lowest monthly total for the Camaro in two full years.

Ford Mustang volume decreased, as well, but that 15-percent year-over-year drop translated to 6,196 November sales. The Mustang’s November pony car victory — its first since August but its 23rd in the last 25 months — drove up the Ford’s U.S. year-to-date sales lead over the Camaro to 33,163 units with one month remaining on the calendar.

In calendar year 2015, with the new Mustang all the rage and the Camaro at the end of its fifth-gen tenure, the Mustang outsold the Camaro 44,847 units. Between 2010 and 2014, the Camaro outsold the Mustang by an annual average of nearly 6,800 units.

Dodge Challenger sales are down 4 percent to 59,176 units in 2016, which is on pace to be the first year since the nameplate’s return that Challenger sales won’t improve, year-over-year. Challengers were discounted by an average of $3,649 per vehicle in November, according to J.D. Power PIN data. Ford’s average per-Mustang incentive was $2,723.

With an incentive cutback and decreasing sales in November, Chevrolet’s already high level of Camaro inventory further ballooned, just as we approach a season in which Camaro, Mustang, and Challenger sales flag. December figures should be slightly higher than November’s, but January and February sales are expected to decrease dramatically. January is historically the lowest-volume month of the year for Camaro sales; January and February account for 17 percent of the calendar but roughly 14 percent of annual Camaro volume.

Yet it’s as we approach these months that GM’s Camaro inventory has expanded to well in excess of 30,000 units, very nearly six months of supply.

In other words, if General Motors stopped building the Camaro at its Lansing, Michigan, assembly plant today, there are enough Camaros in stock at dealers and on their way to dealers to make it to the end of May 2017.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 76 comments
  • Joeveto3 Joeveto3 on Dec 07, 2016

    I recently rented one of these while I was in San Diego. I was excited to see how it compared to the previous generation. And while I certainly found it to be an improvement, ultimately, the lack of visibility killed it for me. I could never buy one. And it's a shame, because the 6 cylinder engine is great, the interior is better (still not where it should be), the gauges are nice, the handling is good, the steering isn't bad (could use more feedback). The automatic was fine, though I'd look for a stick. I'm in the market for another "fun" car. But because I can't see out of it, I won't consider the Camaro.

  • Stanczyk Stanczyk on Dec 08, 2016

    Messy-chaotic, boring and dated Exterior-design is a major problem here... This car, with "full-core" Vette-power and "Alpha-platform" handling.. has better "mechanical characteristics" than a very successful (globally) Ford Mustang .. GM sold a lot of previous gen. Camaros .. even if it was heavy, had poor visibility .. and crappy interior .. but .. it had muscular "heavy-weight".."hot-wheel" design ...

  • ToolGuy This is the kind of thing you get when you give people faster internet.
  • ToolGuy North America is already the greatest country on the planet, and I have learned to be careful about what I wish for in terms of making changes. I mean, if Greenland wants to buy JDM vehicles, isn't that for the Danes to decide?
  • ToolGuy Once again my home did not catch on fire and my fire extinguisher(s) stayed in the closet, unused. I guess I threw my money away on fire extinguishers.(And by fire extinguishers I mean nuclear missiles.)
  • Carson D The UAW has succeeded in organizing a US VW plant before. There's a reason they don't teach history in the schools any longer. People wouldn't make the same mistakes.
  • B-BodyBuick84 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport of course, a 7 seater, 2.4 turbo-diesel I4 BOF SUV with Super-Select 4WD, centre and rear locking diffs standard of course.
Next