Now a Self-Driving Technology and Mobility Player, Ford Seeks an Edge

Adam Tonge
by Adam Tonge

Taking to a Dearborn stage on Monday, Ford Motor Company CEO Mark Fields declared, “We are expanding our business to be both an auto and mobility company.” With this statement, Fields has created additional competition. No longer will Ford only be battling traditional auto manufacturers.

Now, the automaker’s competitors include Uber, Lyft, Google, and Apple — each one focused on current and future mobility solutions. How does the company plan to win?

While Ford’s race to build an autonomous vehicle isn’t unique to the automotive industry, it illustrates how auto manufacturers are looking to and planning for the future. During his time on stage, Fields talked extensively about Ford Smart Mobility. This is the company’s plan to lead the industry in vehicle connectivity, vehicle mobility, autonomous vehicles, customer experience, and data & analytics. The plan’s end game? Affordable, fully autonomous vehicles, available to both consumers and businesses. (Or so Ford hopes.)

This also will lead to Ford changing its business model. Ford will go from a company entirely dependent on vehicles sales to one dependent on vehicle sales as well as transportation services. The reasoning behind this change in philosophy is influenced by the following:

Every minute in the United States, thirty new vehicles are sold.

During that same minute, seven million miles are driven, 125,000 taxis and Ubers are on the road, there are 60,000 shared rides, 450,000 bytes are transmitted between connected vehicles, and 350,000 apps are downloaded.

Ford wants a piece of that action. As Americans increasingly look at vehicle usage differently, Fields believes that Ford’s continued existence depends on providing transportation services and solutions. The first step will be to start a shuttle service to supplement public transportation in major metropolitan areas by the beginning of the next decade.

Central to all of these plans is the fully autonomous vehicle. Fields believes that autonomous vehicles will have a significant impact on society — an impact as significant as Ford’s moving assembly line. Ford will attempt to once again, “Make people’s lives better by changing the way the world moves.”

Since the autonomous vehicle is supposed to change how the world moves, how does it move? Luckily, Ford set up a demonstration on how these vehicles function on public roads. Over the last year, Ford has adding a suite of sensors to a number of Fusion Hybrids. Currently, Ford fits a high resolution color camera, short and long range radar, LIDAR, stereo cameras, and monocular cameras to their test vehicles. Paired with software development, these sensors give the Fusions the ability to drive without human input.

In order to get to this stage, Ford has partnered, invested in, or purchased four different technology companies. These companies have helped with advanced algorithms, 3D mapping, LIDAR, and radar and camera sensors. Ford also is expanding its Silicon Valley operations, creating a dedicated campus in Palo Alto. This campus has new facilities and will be doubling the size of the staff by next year.

Ford has done testing at M-City, the State of Michigan’s autonomous vehicle test site, its proving grounds, and on public roads. These vehicles are referred to as an SAE Level 4 Autonomous Vehicle. They can operate independently within a geographically fenced area. The roads these vehicles travel are all mapped and verified. This is the same level autonomous vehicle that Ford will be rolling out to vehicle and livery services by 2021.

Besides the weird-looking roof rack, there is nothing particularly remarkable about these Fusions. Once inside, the cabin’s appointments are standard Ford fare. An engineer sits in the drivers seat, ready to take over the wheel in an emergency. Ford doesn’t want an autonomous Fusion getting ideas from your average Mustang leaving a Cars and Coffee event. Another engineer sits in the front passenger seat, viewing the data from the vehicles array of sensors.

Once the car is put in “L”, the computer takes over. Slowly accelerating through the parking lot, the Fusion scans the area for pedestrians, doors opening, and other obstacles. It then comes to a rest at a stop sign, turns right, and we’re out on a public road.

Throughout the drive, the test vehicle navigates four way stops, stop lights, pedestrian crossings, and curvy roads. Even the most sinister of all traffic maneuvers, the unprotected left turn, is no match for the Fusion. The vehicle is able to handle all of the real world situations this two mile course could offer. The various sensors send information back to the vehicle on when it is safe to proceed, make a turn, and at what speed. Acceleration and deceleration are smooth, and the steering is precise. It’s almost exactly like riding in a vehicle driven by a human.

Compared to a human driver, safety and compliance are the most obvious differences in the way an autonomous vehicle drives. The autonomous Fusion is the most cautiously driven vehicle not belonging to a drivers’ ed school. It makes complete stops, puts the turn signal on ahead of time, and yields to other vehicles at four-way stops. It also drives exactly at the speed limit and obeys all state-mandated rules of the road. A good example of this is when the vehicle came to a flashing crosswalk. In Michigan, cars must not drive through a flashing crosswalk, even if there are no pedestrians crossing the road. However, that didn’t stop two non-autonomous vehicles from driving through a flashing crosswalk during the test drive. The autonomous Fusion waited patiently until the lights stopped flashing.

After taking a ride in a self-driving vehicle, it’s not hard to see that they will make roads safer and change the way we view transportation. Vehicles will now be able to be utilized on a 24/7 basis with the biggest liability — humans — removed from the driving picture.

After a short ride and some discussion with engineers, Ford’s vision of profitability through transportation services and solutions becomes more clear. I just have one unanswered question: if four autonomous cars roll up to a four-way stop at the same time, who goes first?

[Graph: Ford Motor Company]

Adam Tonge
Adam Tonge

More by Adam Tonge

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 38 comments
  • Tresmonos Tresmonos on Sep 14, 2016

    But what about Mark Fields' suit? You need to be asking the tough questions!

    • See 3 previous
    • Adam Tonge Adam Tonge on Sep 15, 2016

      @JimZ It's slowly making it's return. Right now, it's business in front and planning a party in back. How do you feel about the change from Sony to B&O? Anthony Prozzi told me that, with the new B&O speakers, Ford can immerse me in luxurious sound. A cocoon of sound will cradle me and provide my ears with sonic nourishment.

  • Stuki Stuki on Sep 15, 2016

    As long as those looking to put their freely obtained Yellen notes look at actual profitability when pricing car companies, while applying dot com valuation rigor when looking at "mobility companies", being a "Mobility company" is undoubtedly good for shareholders.

    • See 2 previous
    • VoGo VoGo on Sep 15, 2016

      @stuki So many words; so little meaning. Bottom line: if you think Ford is overvalued, show some stones and short the stock. You deserve to profit from your insight instead of sharing it with community college guys like me. Oh, and just for the record, the community college I attended is called Columbia and it's in a community called the City of New York.

  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next