Dart, 200 On The Way Out; Wrangler Truck, Wagoneer On the Way In

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles CEO Sergio Marchionne on Wednesday said the automaker would rely more heavily on profitable Jeeps and Rams in North America and Europe to help its business remain profitable in other sagging areas and regions.

“We are not of the view that this industry is facing an impending demise,” Marchionne said before announcing FCA’s adjusted earnings of $1.78 billion in the fourth quarter.

Marchionne and CFO Richard Palmer said Jeep’s success in North America and Europe led the company last year and would be the “bedrock” for the automaker’s future. The automaker laid out specific plans to bring forward a Jeep pickup and Wagoneer, and let wither less-profitable models such as the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Dart.

Marchionne said the compact cars would “run their course,” and the automaker would look for future partnerships with others to build the compact cars.

Earlier in the conference, the FCA CEO compared the next few years of the automaker’s future to wandering through the desert, but said that FCA has grown considerably since its ambitious 2014 plan.

“When I look back at the last two years I feel comfortable that we’ve created an organization that has a much more durable and dependable capital structure,” Marchionne said.

Part of that has included spinning of luxury brand Ferrari and boosting Jeep production worldwide. But Marchionne laid out the company’s missteps too: Alfa Romeo’s ambitious rollout has been scaled back significantly, Maserati’s scope has been narrowed, and the company will refocus on Europe and North America as profit drivers, not Latin America and China.

The Alfa Romeo Giulia sedan won’t go into production until March and Alfa’s first SUV won’t arrive until 2017, according to the automaker. The rest of the Alfa Romeo lineup: a full-size sedan, two crossovers, two “specialty” cars and a hatchback won’t arrive until 2020 — two years later than planned.

Luxury arm Maserati will get a much-needed SUV — the Levante — later this year, the automaker said, but wild expectations for the brand have dampened considerably due to slowing economic conditions in China.

“We have readjusted all of our plans,” Marchionne told investors. He said his forecast in 2014 of 7 million cars by 2018 doesn’t matter anymore — the automaker won’t be driven by volume.

“We’re going to stay away from enunciating goals as they relate to metrics,” Marchionne said.

Instead, Marchionne said Jeep would contribute significantly to the group’s overall bottom line, and new offerings such as a Wrangler-based pickup and large SUV would drive future profits.

The CEO also said that production would be realigned at other plants to accommodate the automaker’s shift in strategy away from passenger cars and toward more profitable SUVs and trucks.

Despite pegging sales on trucks and SUVs — which Palmer said was a permanent shift for the industry — Marchionne projected that sales in North America and Europe would be relatively flat, and that the industry reached “top-ish” volume over the last year.

FCA also included plans that signal a shift toward more electrification: a mild Ram 1500 pickup is planned around 2018, and a mild Jeep Wrangler Hybrid before a full-hybrid Wrangler by around 2022. It’s unclear where diesel powertrains fit into the mix — despite planning for a diesel-powered next-generation Wrangler, the executives were quiet about Ram’s current diesel powertrain.

[Image: FCA]

Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 166 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jan 28, 2016

    I think FCA will not be around in the long term. It will be broken down, sold off and swallowed up. You will see non US companies purchases the more profitable parts of the company as they are sold off. Many of the names will exist, in developing nations as has occurred with the likes of Fargo, De Soto, etc. Yes, these names are still in use today in places like Turkey. Jeep could be sold to some Indian or Chinese company as Volvo had. Ram will sold off to a foreign manufacturer. These vehicles will still exist, and the new owners will most likely profit and make these products even better. Improving FCA/Chrysler product should not be hard. For the past four decades Chrysler, then MB/Chrysler and now FCA/Chrysler have always been nearly there against the competition, but never eclipsing their opponents. Chrysler and it co-owners never, ever, seemed to have the cash to produce a truly competitive Chrysler/Ram/Jeep/etc.

  • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Jan 28, 2016

    Whew, the B&B delivered on this one. I am pretty much speechless. I think it's going to turn out that Sergio had some kind of brain condition that went undiagnosed. That is my only explanation for this madness.

    • BklynPete BklynPete on Jan 28, 2016

      His brain is fine. Sergio is just a well-paid thief and bag man. He works for the Agnelli family. Their flailing empire has been propped up by the Italian Government for over 4 decades. Now that they see that the gig is up, they're looking to cash out. Until Sergio figures out the exit plan (sell Jeep and RAM, find a sucker for other factories, etc.), he's just painting pretty pictures of Alfa Romeos and scrambling behind the scenes.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next