Volkswagen May Cut R&D Budget to Fend Off "Existence-Threatening Crisis"

by Mark Stevenson

Updated: November 6th, 2015 Published: October 3rd, 2015

volkswagen may cut r d budget to fend off existence threatening crisis

Volkswagen has a very steep, very tough hill to climb, and Volkswagen’s incoming chairman said the emissions scandal that affects 11 million cars is “a threat to the firm’s viability albeit a surmountable one,” reports Reuters.

Dieter Pötsch, who will soon take the chairman spot at Volkswagen Group AG, described the challenges ahead as an “existence-threatening crisis for the company” during a corporate meeting with employees in Wolfsburg, Germany’s Welt am Sonntag reported.

In order to take on those challenges, Volkswagen needs to fund the repairs of some 11 million vehicles, meaning cuts may be made to the company’s 100 billion euro R&D investment budget that was expected to last until 2018.

A cut in R&D spending is seen as a way to avoid a downgrade of the company’s credit ratings, a source close to the company’s board told Reuters.

Since the diesel emissions saga erupted in mid-September, Volkswagen has seen top-level executives shuffled around the company and — in certain cases — removing executives from posts entirely.

Martin Winterkorn, Volkswagen AG’s former CEO, left his post last week — replaced by Porsche CEO Mattias Müller — amid the scandal. Winterkorn was briefly under investigation in Germany until prosecutors said they had no proof Winterkorn knew of the cheating emissions software.

In the United States, at least one of Volkswagen’s largest dealers is taking the brand’s cars off the front line of its lot, the brand is the only one to see transaction prices trend negative last month, and its daily sales rate is down significantly even though the brand saw an overall monthly sales uptick due to a favorable sales situation in September.

#Chairman #Cuts #Existence-threateningCrisis #R7d #ResearchAndDevelopment #Volkswagen #VwDieselScandal

Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments

Join the conversation

6 of 67 comments

Pch101 on Oct 04, 2015

Reducing R&D is a given. The questions to ask are what programs are going to be cut and/or delayed, and how large the cuts will be. If those reductions can't produce enough savings, then start looking for stock dilution, asset sales, layoffs, etc. to supplement those cuts.

Like Reply
Kmars2009 on Oct 04, 2015

@highdesertcat...just because there is oil, does not mean we are to continue using it. The whole point to EV or alternative fuel, is to reduce emissions. Correct?

Like Reply
- See 3 previous
- Highdesertcat on Oct 04, 2015
  
  kmars2009, I'm sure that there is a small eco-friendly tree-hugging segment of the American population that wants to reduce emissions. I say good on them! I'm not one of them. But I am a proponent of the more choice we have, the merrier. This means if people wants EVs, let there be EVs (without taxpayer subsidies). However, since there is sooooooooooooooo much oil, why not use it? It has served us long and well. Ditto coal! If we don't burn it, someone else will because we will export it. And I also think that there is room for alternative sources of energy, like solar, wind, wave, geothermal, natgas and nuclear. The more the merrier, but without taxpayer subsidies.
  
  Like
- Mcs on Oct 04, 2015
  
  @highdesertcat >> This means if people wants EVs, let there be EVs (without taxpayer subsidies). That's okay, but we should get rid of ICE car and oil industry subsidies as well. http://www.reliableplant.com/Read/14907/foreign-owned-auto-plants-netted-$36b-in-subsidies
  
  Like
- Highdesertcat on Oct 04, 2015
  
  mcs, I agree! It is because of those subsidies that gasoline prices were artificially driven higher than they should have been. But the harsh reality of an overabundance of oil has finally set in and gas prices today are where they should have been all along.
  
  Like
- Mcs on Oct 04, 2015
  
  @highdesertcat Actually, I think the subsidies for Tesla and the Leaf are due to expire. Not sure of the time period. I think the technology is improving to the point they really won't need the subsidies soon - and I really don't think Tesla needs them now. I'm also in a somewhat unique position of receiving both oil subsidies and an EV subsidy. I'd be fine without them - although, I do look at it as a way of reducing the taxes I pay. I'm a New Mexico taxpayer and I've never even been in the state. Tax cuts for the rich sort of in disguise.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Tassos OK Corey. I went and saw the photos again. Besides the fins, one thing I did not like on one of the models (I bet it was the 59) was the windshield, which looked bent (although I would bet its designer thought it was so cool at the time). Besides the too loud fins. The 58 was better.
Spectator Lawfare in action, let’s see where this goes.
Zerocred I highly recommend a Mini Cooper. They are fun to drive, very reliable, get great gas mileage, and everyone likes the way they look.Just as an aside I have one that I’d be willing to part with just as soon as I get the engine back in after its annual rebuild.
NJRide Any new Infinitis in these plans? I feel like they might as well replace the QX50 with a Murano upgrade
CaddyDaddy Start with a good vehicle (avoid anything FCA / European and most GM, they are all Junk). Buy from a private party which allows you to know the former owner. Have the vehicle checked out by a reputable mechanic. Go into the situation with the upper hand of the trade in value of the car. Have the ability to pay on the spot or at you bank immediately with cash or ability to draw on a loan. Millions of cars are out there, the one you are looking at is not a limited commodity. Dealers are a government protected monopoly that only add an unnecessary cost to those too intellectually lazy to do research for a good used car.