CAMI Gets $250 Million Investment For Flexible Assembly Line

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

GM announced a $250 million dollar investment for the CAMI plant in Ingersoll, Ontaro. CAMI is the main production site for the Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain (also known as the Theta crossovers), two of GM’s best selling models, and the investment comes amid uncertainty over the fate of CAMI itself.

Earlier in the year, CAMI was one of three sites being considered for production of the next generation Terrain and Equinox, along with GM’s former Saturn plant in Spring Hill, Tennessee and a site in Mexico. In its current state, CAMI is running beyond maximum capacity, with overflow being sent to GM’s Oshawa, Ontario plant as well as Spring Hill. Both Spring Hill and Mexico were being considered due to the lower costs; Tennessee is staffed mainly by new hires who are paid wages roughly half that of most UAW workers, while Mexico’s costs are substantially lower than in Canada or the United States.

While GM ultimately decided to invest the $250 million in CAMI, there is no official word on whether it will build the crossovers. A GM press release described the investment as being earmarked for a flexible assembly line, similar to the one utilized in Oshawa. A flex line is capable of building any number of vehicles on one assembly line. While crossovers make up 40 percent of Canada’s light vehicle exports, this opens the door for CAMI to produce almost anything in GM’s lineup.

On the other hand, there are a few factors that could pop up at a later date. CAMI could see Theta production migrate elsewhere, as GM attempts to increase the profitability of these vehicles, which sold over 300,000 units combined in 2012. Another issue is possible job losses associated with increased robotization, something the Canadian Auto Workers union is well aware of. And finally, the CAMI investment raises further questions about the future of Oshawa, which has slowly seen its product migrate back to American plants.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 8 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Mar 09, 2013

    Well, if you believe the 3-part on Dan Akerson, there's no strategy for the company. That would mean that it's useless trying to figure out what's going on with CAMI getting a flex line when there's already one in Oshawa. An assembly plant with a flex line would be invaluable for its ability to add runs of popular vehicles in short supply, but like electrical generating plants having base line output, the flex line needs a base model for steady production. Ideally, ALL of GM's assembly plants are flex lines, allowing production and distribution to be fine tuned. Given the head scratching moves made both north and south of the world's longest undefended border, I'm inclined to believe that there really IS no master plan at work, Akerson is making decisions by the seat of his pants, and GM is headed for a tough stretch when his successor(s) are forced to initiate a period of rationalization.

    • Doctor olds Doctor olds on Mar 09, 2013

      If you believe the 3 part, you are misinformed. It is amazingly naive of folks who seldom if ever deal with even $1 million issues to think those running a $150+Billion company don't have a future plan! This is especially absurd given the incredible amount of validation and long lead time, not to mention these little 1/4 $billion decisions made in the car business. Think about it.

  • Pig_Iron Pig_Iron on Mar 10, 2013

    If Oshawa closes, where will the Canadian GM headquarters be? Probably like the other foreign makers there. In a marketing office / parts warehouse in suburban Toronto. I guess anyone who want's to see it, should swing by the Oshawa auto museum before the closure.

    • Doctor olds Doctor olds on Mar 10, 2013

      @Pig_Iron- I wouln't jump to the conclusion that Oshawa will go away. GM maintains a considerable staff, including product engineering activities in Canada. In recognition of the strategic importance of automaking product development and management, as well as manufacturing, the government has long insisted that GM maintain those particular activities in Canada. I think Ford has similar agreements, but am not familiar with them.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next