What's Wrong With This Picture: Lord Love A Lincoln Edition

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

What can you even say about Lincoln at this point? The brand talks up its new design studio, and then releases a “spot the changes” facelift. Critics bash the brand’s waterfall grille as “cetacean,” so for the facelift Lincoln goes and makes it look even more like baleen. Lincolns have little identity beyond Fords loaded up with there-for-the-sake-of-it technology, so they give the MKS and MKT (Ecoboost only) “Continuously Controlled Damping”… to polish their carefully-honed performance image? Because consumers were clamoring for a Lincoln, but didn’t buy because “Sport Mode” wasn’t available on its giant crossover? I know these are only holdover models, and that Lincoln will eventually come out with something all-new. I know that picking on these sales weaklings is too easy. I know that there are probably even a few folks out there that find the MKS and MKT to be the subtle-but-cosseting waft-mobiles that they’ve been waiting for… but I just can’t help myself. Especially when Lincoln’s press release on the MKS proclaims that

Refinements Signal Direction for Brand Today, Tomorrow.

Note to Lincoln: the future is not in refinements. If this brand is going to survive, it needs a clean sheet of paper.





Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 75 comments
  • Faygo Faygo on Nov 18, 2011

    one thing to consider when criticizing the speed (or lack thereof) over which the Lincoln line-up has been revised is timing and spending. as much as everyone wants to talk about how much quicker the industry is now than in the past, it's still a non-trivial effort to do the amount of engineering involved in these updates. and when you count back from now to when the decisions to go forward were made, you end up in mid-2009, with Ford not yet out of the woods economically, without any indication of the coming success of the plans executed post-crash. at that point, trying to spend big on very small volume luxury models would have gotten the product planners laughed out of their first discussion with management. refreshed Edge/MKX (which have done well AFAIK), Fiesta, Focus, new, more efficient truck powertrains, hell even Raptor and Mustang money would have been (and was) better spent. meanwhile, the Fusion/Mondeo/MKZ program has been a huge undertaking and will bear very attractive fruit in a few weeks at the Detroit show. additionally, at that point, Ford was getting started paying down it's debt while GM and (to a much lesser extent) Chrysler were able to spend freely, having limited debt post-bankruptcy. their borrowing costs were higher, but their debt service was much, much, much lower. the cadence for updating the D-cars (including Taurus) with updated MyFordTouch and normal mid-cycle freshening actions is to be expected. the suspension changes put forward the emphasis on unique Lincoln handling and technology DNA. that sort of thing isn't sexy and unfortunately doesn't sell (many) cars, but it makes those which do sell that much more recommendable to others or favorably reviewable. within the limited scope available, the very subtle start of a new styling direction is understandable. it's not earth-shattering, but it's a start. Lexus nor Audi have been hurt by not offering volume (or any in Audi's case) models with RWD in their recent success. BMW will prove that no one cares what sort of engine is under the hood when people start paying $50k+ for a 528i with a turbo 4 (base 528i is $48k before basically any options) or $45k for a Z4. RWD nor V8s nor particular pieces of technology make a premium brand. something people want and want to be seen in do. it remains to be seen whether that's where Lincoln can end up, when.

  • Zykotec Zykotec on Nov 21, 2011

    I think the main thing Cadillac and Lincoln have to understand if they are going to be known as 'luxury' cars again, is that people buying luxury cars aren't looking for a 'deal' or a 'bargain'. Rich people who wants a cheaper car doesn't buy a luxury car. You don't see Porsche bragging about the 911 turbo being cheaper than a similar Ferrari, or Bentley saying their new model is cheaper than a similar S-class. Luxury car buyers buy prestige and a unique experience. They don't buy Armani because it's cheaper than Dolce&Gabbana... If they (American 'luxury' brands) would just charge more for their cars (that's actually all they have to do), and let people know that their cars are more expensive, people would look at their buyers and think: 'wow, he doesn't care what the car costs, he must have way to much money'. And that is the feeling luxury car buyers want. They want to be looked up to by the 'common' people. They want to feel rich, and you don't get that with people knowing you made a bargain. Certainly not when 'common people' can afford the same car you drive...

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next