When Will The Government Address The "Epidemic" Of Left Lane Banditry?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Government officials like Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood spend much of their time justifying their positions by tilting at national windmills like the “epidemic” of distracted driving, generally with relatively modest results. And yet, despite the massive increase in mobile device use over the last decades or so, on-road deaths per vehicle mile traveled are at an all-time low. So here’s a new “epidemic” for Secretary LaHood: lane discipline. Every time I take to the freeway, I’m absolutely shocked by the number of people driving at or below the speed limit in the left lane, and the number of people who stay in the fastlane even when there’s nobody to pass. And I don’t have to rely on anecdotal evidence to know lane discipline is a problem in America (or, at least in the Pacific Northwest). According to the PEMCO Insurance Northwest Poll,

43 percent of Washington drivers don’t know that impeding the flow of traffic in the left lane is against the law.

To which I say “bullshit.” Not only is it illegal to impede left lane traffic in Washington (and Oregon, where I live), but the freeways in both states have regular “keep right except to pass” signs, so the ignorance defense doesn’t really apply. People simply don’t care about maintaining lane discipline, and ignore any sign that urges them to do so. Clearly signage and the National Motorist’s Association’s Lane Courtesy Awareness Month aren’t doing the trick… and neither does giving the finger.

PEMCO’s presser continues:

PEMCO found that when faced with the prospect of a slow-moving vehicle in front of them, almost a quarter of respondents say that flashing their vehicle’s headlights is the most effective way to encourage left-lane violators to change lanes.

When the roles are reversed, one-third of drivers agree that flashing headlights or tailgating would be the most likely way to encourage them to change lanes.

About a quarter of respondents agree that the least effective method is for other drivers to use hand gestures, and younger drivers find it particularly ineffective to tap on a car’s horn – 23 percent of younger drivers chose horn-honking as the least effective method compared to 13 percent of those 35 and older.

With every civilized response to the menace of left lane banditry leaving fans of lane discipline disappointed, I’m beginning to think that the “Click It Or Ticket”-style campaign strategy that had limited success win addressing distracted driving might just make a difference with this problem. Motorists don’t simply need to be reminded that a law exists, they need to know why it exists (one left lane bandit can create huge traffic jams, wasting time, energy and pollution) and that it will be inflexibly enforced. And not only are there “green” reasons for supporting a lane discipline campaign, the more aware we make drivers aware of the fact that they are sharing the road, the more engaged with their driving and therefore safe they should be. Secretary LaHood, it’s time to take up this noble battle!


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 140 comments
  • Ehsteve Ehsteve on Jul 21, 2011

    Hanging out in the left lane and blocking traffic because of some kind of weird vigilante notion that everyone else should slow down is really messed up. What if someone is having an emergency and needs to get to the hospital? Those few seconds they lost because of you could be the difference between life or death. Move over.

    • Frownsworth Frownsworth on Jul 21, 2011

      Exactly... Nothing worse than a self-righteous, conservative driver who blindingly obeys rules where they see fit (speed limit no matter what), but ignores others where they actually reason (its okay to hang in the left lane even though it is used for passing because of, A, B, C...)

  • Bud777 Bud777 on Dec 06, 2013

    I have found something that works for me, but i am not really sure it is fair to other drivers. I welcome your opinion. If I am driving on an interstate, especially on with three lanes, I do the following: If the traffic is light enough to easily pass, I drive about 1-2 mph faster than the flow of traffic. I prefer to stay in the middle lane, but feel comfortable using the left lane as long as I am watching for someone coming up behind me. By barely exceeding the flow of traffic, only about 10 % of the vehicles will want to pass and they can be easily accommodated. This takes extra attention to match the flow and get out of the way, but I find it keeps me alert. Since my speed relative to the other traffic is 1-2 mph, the only way I am going to have a problem is overtaking a slower vehicle, so I change lanes to maximize the distance to the car ahead of me. The small speed differential is unlikely to attract police attention since I am blending with the other traffic. If traffic is too heavy to easily overtake, I drive in the middle lane, about 1-2 miles per hour slower than the flow. Traffic moves away from me and I am not worried about accidentally getting to close to the car in front of me. When there is no traffic, I use cruise control to keep from speeding excessively. Obviously if everyone did this it would not work, so shhhhhhhhhhhh. What do you think? Am I an asshat? Would this kind of driving offend you?

  • Mebgardner I owned 4 different Z cars beginning with a 1970 model. I could already row'em before buying the first one. They were light, fast, well powered, RWD, good suspenders, and I loved working on them myself when needed. Affordable and great styling, too. On the flip side, parts were expensive and mostly only available in a dealers parts dept. I could live with those same attributes today, but those days are gone long gone. Safety Regulations and Import Regulations, while good things, will not allow for these car attributes at the price point I bought them at.I think I will go shop a GT-R.
  • Lou_BC Honda plans on investing 15 billion CAD. It appears that the Ontario government and Federal government will provide tax breaks and infrastructure upgrades to the tune of 5 billion CAD. This will cover all manufacturing including a battery plant. Honda feels they'll save 20% on production costs having it all localized and in house.As @ Analoggrotto pointed out, another brilliant TTAC press release.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Its cautious approach, which, along with Toyota’s, was criticized for being too slow, is now proving prescient"A little off topic, but where are these critics today and why aren't they being shamed? Why are their lunkheaded comments being memory holed? 'Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.' -Orwell, 1984
  • Tane94 A CVT is not the kiss of death but Nissan erred in putting CVTs in vehicles that should have had conventional automatics. Glad to see the Murano is FINALLY being redesigned. Nostalgia is great but please drop the Z car -- its ultra-low sales volume does not merit continued production. Redirect the $$$ into small and midsize CUVs/SUVs.
  • Analoggrotto Another brilliant press release.
Next