Au Revoir Vel Satis: Renault Promises To Make "Conservative" Luxury Cars

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Having penned my own paean to the late, not-so-widely-lamented Renault Vel Satis after seeing its anodyne Korean replacement, I was somewhat heartened to find that I’m not the only auto writer with something of a weird crush on the strangest luxury car of our day. In the August issue of Evo Magazine, Richard Porter of Sniff Petrol dedicated an entire column [excerpted at vel-satis.org] to his inexplicable love for a car that he admits was

a hopeless old crock [from a time] when Renault’s quality control department couldn’t organise a tasting in a winery.

But, argues Porter, the Vel Satis has a unique appeal in the sense that it was

so self-consciously distanced from its dour German rivals that it was practically falling into La Rochelle Harbour

Whether Porter is genuine in is love for the Vel Satis or simply trolling famously elitist, performance-oriented readership is a question I’ll leave to the Best and Brightest. What is clear is that Porter’s weird love will not be recreated, as Auto Motor und Sport reports that Renault has learned its lesson and will be making “conservative” luxury cars in the future.

Renault’s design boss Laurens van den Acker tells the German buff book that Renault has learned the lesson of adventurous design, and that it will apply lessons learned from experience with the Vel Satis and its equally cool-yet-unsuccessful sibling, the Avantime van-coupe as it goes about building the luxury cars the French government asked for. Leaving aside the issue of French government pressure, van den Acker tells AM und S

Our chief executive Carlos Ghosn has finally empowered us to once again develop a role in our global strategy for a large luxury car. We’re definitely not giving up on this segment. Our [previous] strategy of taking on the strong German competition with three unusual concepts was bold and a sign of out trust in our brand. But the luxury market is very conservative and prefers 100% quality over major innovation. Our vehicles were very innovative but our quality wasn’t the best at the time.

My earlier ode to the Vel Satis was inspired by the bland lines of Renault’s current “flagship,” the Lattitude (a rebadged Samsung or a stretched Laguna, depending on how you look at it), and again it seems Renault is at risk of whip–sawing back to the extreme of conservative design after the Vel Satis and Avantime. After all, van den Acker’s two biggest claims to fame are the overly-adventurous Mazda Nagare concept, and the hyper-conservative first-gen Ford Escape. If he’s going to get the new Renault flagship right, he’s going to have to prove he can combine mass-appeal and trademark French funkiness into a single, coherent design. Otherwise, Renault’s government-encouraged return to the luxury space will yield little more than a few government contracts.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Sector 5 Sector 5 on Jul 18, 2011

    -Peugeot has suffered the same problem- Well yeah cause they often share same parts... Sacre bleu those Renault automatic transmissions.. the 25's was ultra fragile, the Safrane's was little better until replaced by the Aisin. Renault's launch into the exec market in the mid-70's with the 20/30 set the way and didn't get it right. Initially the 20 was offered with an underpowered 1647 fuel injection straight from the 16 TX. The 30 was the same body with a 6 cylinder and cost significantly more i.e. over-priced for what it was. Wealthy Parisians prefer Allemande.

  • TonyJZX TonyJZX on Jul 19, 2011

    the vel satis is an influential car it's ground zero or 'patient zero' for the nissan/renault malaise that goes all the way thru the range it is unfortunately quite ugly but i can see how it may have a fan following you can almost even seen influences with the 350z, g35/37 and even the skyline gtr

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next