New Jersey: Longer Yellow Eliminates Red Light Running

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Red light running all but disappeared at a New Jersey intersection after the duration of the yellow light warning time was increased under threat of a lawsuit. Glassboro gave the private company American Traffic Solutions (ATS) permission to issue red light camera tickets at the intersection of William Dalton Drive and Delsea Drive on March 26. The location was so successful at issuing $85 tickets that it generated $1 million worth of notices within just seven months.

On average, 90 percent of these citations were issued to drivers in the right-hand lane mostly for making slow, rolling turns. On average, there were 191 tickets issued each month in the other lanes for alleged straight-through and left-turn violations that most consider to be red light running. Data generated by ATS and provided under a freedom of information request did not separate straight-through and right-turn violations.

Through violations plunged after ATS mailed a ticket to Mike Koestler, the former mayor of Harrison Township, for an alleged offense that took place in Glassboro. Koestler’s investigation led to the discovery that the 3.0 second yellow time on the westbound approach of the intersection was in violation of state signal timing regulations. On October 26, the borough boosted the yellow time to 4.0 seconds.

In November, the first full month following the change, the number of tickets issued in the non-right-turn lanes dropped 88 percent to 23 tickets issued. The figure dropped to 8 in December and was just 13 in January 2011. For just the westbound approach, the average number of tickets dropped from 71 per month to zero tickets through January.

While a one-second difference in the duration of the yellow warning at an intersection might seem insignificant, the extra margin of safety is critical. The vast majority of straight-through red light “violations” happen when drivers misjudge the end of the yellow light by less than 0.25 seconds — literally the blink of an eye ( view Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) chart). In most cases, a yellow shortened by one second can increase the number of tickets issued by 110 percent, according to a TTI report. Confidential documents uncovered in a San Diego court trial prove that the city and its private vendor, now Affiliated Computer Services (ACS), colluded to install red light cameras only at intersections found to have short yellow times ( view documents), thereby maximizing profits. Yellow time generally does not affect the number of right-turn tickets issued.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 8 comments
  • Stuki Stuki on Mar 03, 2011

    It would be interesting to see if this effect will continue to hold, or if people over time starts anticipating the longer yellows, choosing to push their luck once again. In some imaginary corner case of ten minute yellows, I somehow doubt noone would ever figure out that running a yellow would be fairly safe.

  • Old Guy Old Guy on Mar 03, 2011

    "...straight-through and left-turn violations that most consider to be red light running." Doesn't everyone consider these violations to be red-light running?

    • Steve65 Steve65 on Mar 03, 2011

      That wording looks to me like an indirect assertion that turning right on red without stopping doesn't constitute running a red light.

  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
Next