Wild-Ass Rumor Of The Day: Buick Taking On Lexus LS?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

Sometimes I miss Bob Lutz so much it hurts. First we’re teased with rumors of a Cadillac flagship and now this: a Zeta-based Buick flagship that’s the spiritual successor to the 1996 Buick Roadmaster. The news is exciting, even if it lacks the panache of a Lutzian rear-wheel-drive screed. But you have to read a little deeper for the real punch line.

The Buick Roadmaster never had the stones to fight the Lexus LS400. But GM Inside News reports the opposite, “the logic internally is that the Buick flagship would be designed to compete directly with the Lexus LS, while the Cadillac flagship would be designed to directly target the BMW 7-Series.” Buick and Cadillac already fight each other in at the near-luxury price point, and their incentive laden, six-cylinder offerings aren’t selling in numbers that strike fear in the hearts of incentive-averse BMW and Lexus. To say it’s an uphill battle for volume-intensive General Motors is an understatement. Just look at the incentive-fueled fiasco created by overproducing the flagship Corvette ZR1!

While I am thrilled to hear of a resurgence in proper GM Iron, this reeks of the branding desperation once seen in GM’s downsized luxury sedan portfolio of the 1980s. No matter how un-beancounted they shall be, these super-luxe sedans have an identity crisis built into their price point. It’s a tough road to bring a proper Cadillac flagship back into the public conscious, but that’s where this brand belongs. But who is gonna pay $60-large for Buick aimed at the Lexus LS?

Yes, the Chinese Buick Park Avenue needs a refresh. Taking stateside advantage of that is a smart move. But until GM figures out Buick’s near luxury role and Cadillac’s top dog status, they will eat each other alive. And while they bludgeon themselves with each other’s VW Phaeton-esque rebates, BMW and Lexus breathe a collective sigh of relief. Again. Because, sort of like my 1986 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five, a true Caddy is head and shoulders above a comparable Buick: longer wheelbase, better performance and abundantly more luxury features. Most importantly, that implies a far less attainable MSRP.

I’d wager that even the legendary Buickman sees the writing on the Tri-Shield’s wall. Assuming the GM IPO brings long term cash necessary to build these super sedans, they’ll have great appeal for niche buyers and long term collectors. However, believing that this two-pronged approach is a credible threat to the Lexus LS and BMW 7-er is a tough sell. Because at the end of the day, price sells cars.


Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 48 comments
  • George B George B on Aug 07, 2010

    Buick = Chevy + Chrome trim. It is not and has not been a luxury brand in at least a generation. Buick exists so Buick GMC dealerships have cars to sell alongside their GMC trucks. The fundamental problem is that Chevrolet needs to improve a little to match its class leaders. Better fit and finish and better interior materials. However, improving Chevrolet causes more cross shopping with Buick from below. It would be nice if Cadillac could move up in price and compete at the top levels of luxury cars, but right now they just can't. Went to the Cars and Coffee car meet in Plano, TX this morning. They had many brands of cars including some Hyundai Genesis coupes, many American Muscle cars both new and antique, many BMWs, a few Lexuses, RWD Nissan from 240SX through Infiniti G plus Nissan GTR, many Jaguars, a Bentley, and Italian exotics. However, I can't remember seeing a single Cadillac. Not one. Cadillac has been making a good car,the CTS, for several years, but even its not "show off to your friends" good.

  • Cammy Corrigan Cammy Corrigan on Aug 07, 2010

    To all the people who think Buick isn't aiming for Lexus, Acura etc and that Cadillac isn't aiming for BMW, mercedes-Benz, Audi, etc hopefully, this video will put this matter to rest. I'm not saying that GM are doing a good job or a bad job, I'm just saying this was their aim. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EA1Lzfh7hU

  • Lorenzo They won't be sold just in Beverly Hills - there's a Nieman-Marcus in nearly every big city. When they're finally junked, the transfer case will be first to be salvaged, since it'll be unused.
  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
  • Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
Next