By on August 3, 2010


Sales numbers for the US market in July should drop today, and based on an early analyst survey, the market’s only recovered to a 12m SAAR at best. Estimates aside though, it’s beginning to look more and more like the US market for new cars is approaching a “new normal.” How so? Automotive News [sub]‘s Jesse Snyder figures it’s

Because discipline is breaking out all over– at manufacturers, suppliers and dealerships.

Even Snyder’s headline captures the mood of cautious realism that’s suddenly taken hold of the auto industry: though the market appears to have moved towards 12m annual units in July, Snyder’s analysis is headlined Life at 11 million U.S. sales.

AutoNation’s CEO Mike Jackson tells AN that the US market is in a “transformational moment” characterized by the abandonment of the old “Push” system that Detroit followed to bankruptcy court. Under that model, manufacturers kept factories humming “at all costs,” pushed the volume onto dealers, and stacked cash on the hood until the cars sold. Needless to say, the affects of this strategy on transaction prices, resale values, brand equity, and dealer floorplan credit requirements were dire. And frankly, if Detroit were still indulging in the strategy, the capacity reductions, management changes and general gut-checking that took place during last year’s bankruptcies and bailouts would have been all for naught. Pushing volume wasn’t the only sin of the bad old GM and Chrysler, but it was one of the most self-destructive.

And the changes are stark: US new car inventories on July 1 of this year were 2.1 million. Back on July 1, 2004 they were literally double that level. On the other hand, the US market was buying a whisker under 17m cars a year back in ’04, so the discrepancy isn’t as dramatic as it might seem. For customers, however, the shift is becoming ever more noticeable. Remember when you could drive to the local Chevy dealer and pick out the exact equipment level you wanted from a dealer’s on-hand stock? Daily supplies of Suburban have dropped from a 60 day pre-recession norm to about 37 days of supply, and more popular models are even more scarce. Dealers are reporting far more trades with other dealers in order to deliver customer-requested trim levels, and they’re claiming that more customers are actually ordering cars to their specifications rather than driving off the lot in something new at all costs.

General Motors is taking the transition away from the “Push” model so seriously from the factory end, that it’s refusing to allow record-low inventory levels for its Theta-platform crossovers (Chevy Equinox, GMC Terrain) to lead to overproduction. With GM’s CAMI plant working three shifts per day with maximum overtime, the temptation to tool up another full production line would have been hard for Old GM to resist. Instead, unused space at CAMI’s bodyshop will be used to build up to 80k additional bodies, which will be trucked to Oshawa Assembly for final production. GM claims the strategy is cheaper, faster to tool up, and generally more flexible than adding capacity at another plant… which means it should be easier to control costs when demand for Thetas eases up.

And though Detroit’s slimmed-down production base is learning to produce more with less, and its dealers are getting used to walking customers through the ordering process rather than loading up on inventory, the final piece of the discipline puzzle is still missing. Though incentives are down an average of $300 per vehicle since this time last year, Detroit still leads the industry in incentive spending. Despite public come-to-Jesus moments on the incentive issue at both GM and Chrysler, the two firms have spent around $3,000 per vehicle in incentives for most of this year. And as the Center for Automotive Research’s David Cole puts it

There is no faster way to profitability than to cut incentives

And that’s really what this all comes down to. Volume is important, as is discipline on the factory and dealer side, but until incentives come down and profits come up, a sustainable “new normal” will remain elusive. After all, analysts seem to agree that pent-up demand is nearly non-existent, and that low sales are simply making up for the sins of the past. As long as brands are offering thousands of dollars in incentives, that pent-up demand is unlikely to materialize. Similarly, fleet sales have dropped to about 15 percent of industry sales from 23 percent in the first half of the year, according to Ford’s George Pipas [via the WSJ [sub]], but Detroit still makes up the majority of those sales. And while GM, Chrysler and Ford struggle to work off the last remnants of their Push-model additction, JD Power’s Jeff Schuster has a warning that should be familiar to any recovering addict:

We have a greater opportunity to make change that’s permanent. But as the sun comes out, it’s easy to let go of some things you have learned.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

12 Comments on “Postcards From “The New Normal”...”


  • avatar
    carguy

    It may be the new medium term “normal” but once economic growth returns to normal and finance companies return to more aggressive car financing, the car market will grow accordingly. When this will be is anyones guess but I don’t think the American love affair with the automobile is over just yet.

    • 0 avatar
      Eric M

      The love affair isn’t over, but the bank account is limiting the fun. We see this in decreased demand for new, and increased demand for recent used cars in good condition.

      Also I think there is a mind-shift occurring, from cars being 3-5 year disposable toys to 10+ year commitments. The push for quality in most cars is leading to cars with 15 year service lives. At 15 years average fleet life we only need to make ~12 million cars a year.

      All said and told, good for GM. I hope this new found discipline becomes a long term thing for them.

    • 0 avatar
      hreardon

      @ Eric M –

      I’d love to believe those numbers, but I’m going to see a few data points before I sign on in agreement.

      While I think that anecdotally there are more people holding onto cars longer than before, I’m not sold that people are indeed dropping 3 – 4 year leases just yet.

      I think that one of the reasons why luxury cars have rebounded is because of the new stock market bubble that is brewing, so the sense of faux wealth is undergirding those purchases. We’ll know better by the end of the year, I think.

  • avatar
    seabrjim

    When will the economy return to normal? Better yet, how?

  • avatar
    Steven02

    My understanding is that most auto manufactures are cutting incentives, except for Toyota. Even if Detroit is leading the incentives, it isn’t all bad. Detroit sells more trucks than anyone else and these have higher incentives. It would be great to know incentives as a percentage of MSRP.

    My understanding is that the fleet sales were basically non existent last year and adding to the demand of this year to make up the difference. When those return to normal levels, it will be good to see the numbers at that time.

  • avatar
    MikeAR

    There were several things not really delved into in this article. Like, how much overcapacity is left in the system if 11-12 million/year is the new normal? Also maybe incentive spending isn’t too high but car prices are. The price after incentives is the real value to the buyer. Without incentives prices are just too high for most potential buyers. Would it make sense to cut prices across the board and stop incentives?

  • avatar
    tced2

    When I first saw the headline, I thought it might be about Normal, IL – home of Mitsubishi in the US. I haven’t been by the factory lately, but they used to have a huge inventory of finished product looking like the picture.

  • avatar
    snabster

    Why have I heard this song before?

    Isn’t the dealer structure the problem here. As you as you, car company, have the incentive to sell your product to the dealer, you are always going to push it out then use incentives/factory pricing adjustments to smooth the curve.

    As long as the dealer can get the financing — from vendors, captive finance institutions, or banks, to buy the inventory, all this will happen again.

    Is it really so hard to order a car and have it show up at your door in two weeks?

  • avatar
    John Horner

    I’ve been saying for a long time now that the US’ natural new vehicle demand should roughly equal the annual scrap rate. All things considered, the US is a replacement car market. Yes, the population continues to grow, but the population of driving age individuals is pretty stagnant. The US’ population is aging, and our oldest residents either don’t drive or drive very little.

    The US’ annual vehicle scrap rate has typically been in the 12-13 million unit per year range. Last year that went up to 14 million units thanks in part to the 750,000 vehicles scrapped under the c4c program. But, even after 2009’s US fleet shrinkage, we still have more cars in the US than we do licensed drivers. There remains a massive vehicle overhang from all those years when more vehicles were sold than were scrapped.

    Don’t expect to see a return to 16 million units or more sold per year anytime soon, if ever. All in all, this is a good thing. People buying what they need, when they need and can afford it is a much better way to go that is an easy credit fueled consumption bender.

  • avatar
    seabrjim

    I think you may be right, Sean.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States