Postcards From "The New Normal"

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Sales numbers for the US market in July should drop today, and based on an early analyst survey, the market’s only recovered to a 12m SAAR at best. Estimates aside though, it’s beginning to look more and more like the US market for new cars is approaching a “new normal.” How so? Automotive News [sub]’s Jesse Snyder figures it’s

Because discipline is breaking out all over– at manufacturers, suppliers and dealerships.

Even Snyder’s headline captures the mood of cautious realism that’s suddenly taken hold of the auto industry: though the market appears to have moved towards 12m annual units in July, Snyder’s analysis is headlined Life at 11 million U.S. sales.


AutoNation’s CEO Mike Jackson tells AN that the US market is in a “transformational moment” characterized by the abandonment of the old “Push” system that Detroit followed to bankruptcy court. Under that model, manufacturers kept factories humming “at all costs,” pushed the volume onto dealers, and stacked cash on the hood until the cars sold. Needless to say, the affects of this strategy on transaction prices, resale values, brand equity, and dealer floorplan credit requirements were dire. And frankly, if Detroit were still indulging in the strategy, the capacity reductions, management changes and general gut-checking that took place during last year’s bankruptcies and bailouts would have been all for naught. Pushing volume wasn’t the only sin of the bad old GM and Chrysler, but it was one of the most self-destructive.

And the changes are stark: US new car inventories on July 1 of this year were 2.1 million. Back on July 1, 2004 they were literally double that level. On the other hand, the US market was buying a whisker under 17m cars a year back in ’04, so the discrepancy isn’t as dramatic as it might seem. For customers, however, the shift is becoming ever more noticeable. Remember when you could drive to the local Chevy dealer and pick out the exact equipment level you wanted from a dealer’s on-hand stock? Daily supplies of Suburban have dropped from a 60 day pre-recession norm to about 37 days of supply, and more popular models are even more scarce. Dealers are reporting far more trades with other dealers in order to deliver customer-requested trim levels, and they’re claiming that more customers are actually ordering cars to their specifications rather than driving off the lot in something new at all costs.

General Motors is taking the transition away from the “Push” model so seriously from the factory end, that it’s refusing to allow record-low inventory levels for its Theta-platform crossovers (Chevy Equinox, GMC Terrain) to lead to overproduction. With GM’s CAMI plant working three shifts per day with maximum overtime, the temptation to tool up another full production line would have been hard for Old GM to resist. Instead, unused space at CAMI’s bodyshop will be used to build up to 80k additional bodies, which will be trucked to Oshawa Assembly for final production. GM claims the strategy is cheaper, faster to tool up, and generally more flexible than adding capacity at another plant… which means it should be easier to control costs when demand for Thetas eases up.

And though Detroit’s slimmed-down production base is learning to produce more with less, and its dealers are getting used to walking customers through the ordering process rather than loading up on inventory, the final piece of the discipline puzzle is still missing. Though incentives are down an average of $300 per vehicle since this time last year, Detroit still leads the industry in incentive spending. Despite public come-to-Jesus moments on the incentive issue at both GM and Chrysler, the two firms have spent around $3,000 per vehicle in incentives for most of this year. And as the Center for Automotive Research’s David Cole puts it

There is no faster way to profitability than to cut incentives

And that’s really what this all comes down to. Volume is important, as is discipline on the factory and dealer side, but until incentives come down and profits come up, a sustainable “new normal” will remain elusive. After all, analysts seem to agree that pent-up demand is nearly non-existent, and that low sales are simply making up for the sins of the past. As long as brands are offering thousands of dollars in incentives, that pent-up demand is unlikely to materialize. Similarly, fleet sales have dropped to about 15 percent of industry sales from 23 percent in the first half of the year, according to Ford’s George Pipas [via the WSJ [sub]], but Detroit still makes up the majority of those sales. And while GM, Chrysler and Ford struggle to work off the last remnants of their Push-model additction, JD Power’s Jeff Schuster has a warning that should be familiar to any recovering addict:

We have a greater opportunity to make change that’s permanent. But as the sun comes out, it’s easy to let go of some things you have learned.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • John Horner John Horner on Aug 03, 2010

    I've been saying for a long time now that the US' natural new vehicle demand should roughly equal the annual scrap rate. All things considered, the US is a replacement car market. Yes, the population continues to grow, but the population of driving age individuals is pretty stagnant. The US' population is aging, and our oldest residents either don't drive or drive very little. The US' annual vehicle scrap rate has typically been in the 12-13 million unit per year range. Last year that went up to 14 million units thanks in part to the 750,000 vehicles scrapped under the c4c program. But, even after 2009's US fleet shrinkage, we still have more cars in the US than we do licensed drivers. There remains a massive vehicle overhang from all those years when more vehicles were sold than were scrapped. Don't expect to see a return to 16 million units or more sold per year anytime soon, if ever. All in all, this is a good thing. People buying what they need, when they need and can afford it is a much better way to go that is an easy credit fueled consumption bender.

  • Seabrjim Seabrjim on Aug 03, 2010

    I think you may be right, Sean.

  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
  • Keith Most of the stanced VAGS with roof racks are nuisance drivers in my area. Very likely this one's been driven hard. And that silly roof rack is extra $'s, likely at full retail lol. Reminds me of the guys back in the late 20th century would put in their ads that the installed aftermarket stereo would be a negotiated extra. Were they going to go find and reinstall that old Delco if you didn't want the Kraco/Jenson set up they hacked in?
Next