Traffic Camera Company Embeds Former Spokesman At Arizona Republic

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

With ballot initiatives and other possible legislative action threatening to put a major photo enforcement company out of business, an effective public relations strategy has become the firm’s top priority. Redflex Traffic Systems on Friday had its former corporate spokesman, Michael Ferraresi, return to writing about the industry for the Arizona Republic newspaper, which covers the battleground market of Phoenix.


Ferraresi got his start at the Republic, which has for several years has provided soft coverage of the photo enforcement industry on its news pages and unabashed support on the editorial side. TheNewspaper analyzed every Republic article that mentioned Redflex between January 2007 and 2008 and found just only three percent of the space in any article, on average, presented any kind of opposing view. Redflex liked what it saw and hired Ferraresi to be its Associate Marketing Manager. In the January 18, 2008 article “Nonstop growth helps traffic company accelerate,” Republic reporter Jane Larson quoted then-Redflex spokesman Michael Ferraresi about the number of cameras the company had in the field. Arizona Republic editors ignored requests for comment when asked at the time whether it was ethical for the paper to quote a former reporter as a source.

Mark Obbie, associate professor in magazine journalism at Syracuse University’s Newhouse School, also told TheNewspaper in a 2008 email that, although he was unfamiliar with the details of the Ferraresi situation, he was deeply concerned over the effect of the revolving door between industry and journalism.

“Mostly it’s bad for journalism — and, more important, for the public,” Obbie wrote. “Those same personal ties that can prove helpful can also inhibit honest reporting. Reporters have a harder time hammering a friend and former coworker. Even more insidious is the effect this revolving door has on beat reporters who may harbor hopes of cashing in some day with a move inside the corporation. What more reason does a reporter need to pull punches, and effectively perform PR while still on the newspaper’s payroll?”

Since that email, Ferraresi made one more revolution back through the door to the Republic. Ferraresi’s latest article was the first to mention Redflex since his return.

“As state leaders slammed the brakes on Arizona’s freeway photo speed-enforcement program, Phoenix police said they continue to see the safety benefits of photo radar and red-light cameras,” Ferraresi’s May 14 article began.

The article presented only the views of the Phoenix police and a pro-camera advocacy group. Before the Ferraresi hire, Redflex efforts at newspapers were limited to paid campaigns to generate letters to the editor that create the illusion of public support for automated enforcement.

“In Illinois a firm was engaged to manage the media interface, develop an advocacy to write letters to the editor, blog on a micro-site about street safety, and be ready to testify in committee hearings,” Redflex explained in a February 25 release to Australian investors. “This has led to positive news coverage and citizen support.”

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • David C. Holzman David C. Holzman on May 17, 2010

    The most egregious thing is that the AZ Republic is using Ferraresi to report on the industry where he was a flak. That is absolutely outrageous. It wouldn't be quite so bad if he were reporting on, say, food, or foreign policy. But it is weird that the Republic would even hire someone who has been any sort of flak.

  • Pleiter Pleiter on May 17, 2010

    Every one of the nice ladies from Phoenix on our bus tour were livid with cameras and the plate frame putsch. They real dug the 00D00Q 0Q0Q0Q D00Q00 idea to combat crimes against ordinary citizens (that came from.....somewhere close).

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next