White House Vows to Investigate Security Risks Posed by Foreign-Connected Vehicle Tech

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Thursday, the Biden administration announced plans to investigate the potential national security risks being confronted by American automakers and any threats posed by connected vehicle technologies controlled by foreign adversaries — including China.


With the issue having been front-and-center in the minds of legislators and industry groups for months, the White House is reportedly taking action regarding China’s determination “to dominate the future of the auto market.”

The relevant press release from the Biden administration stipulates that China may rely on “unfair practices” and policies that could “flood our market with its vehicles, posing risks to our national security.”


From the White House:


Most cars these days are “connected” – they are like smart phones on wheels. These cars are connected to our phones, to navigation systems, to critical infrastructure, and to the companies that made them. Connected vehicles from China could collect sensitive data about our citizens and our infrastructure and send this data back to the People’s Republic of China. These vehicles could be remotely accessed or disabled.
China imposes restrictions on American autos and other foreign autos operating in China. Why should connected vehicles from China be allowed to operate in our country without safeguards?
So today, I am announcing unprecedented actions to ensure that cars on U.S. roads from countries of concern like China do not undermine our national security. I have directed my Secretary of Commerce to conduct an investigation into connected vehicles with technology from countries of concern and to take action to respond to the risks.


The Chinese government has conducted similar investigations into American brands. Tesla vehicles were once prohibited from parking at military bases after concerns were raised that their exterior cameras and permanent connectivity features allowed for data harvesting that could be used to help the United States spy.


As previously reported, China’s BYD is likewise plotting a course to establish a facility in Mexico that would build all-electric passenger vehicles. This has sent various legislators and industry groups into a tizzy, though the United States has been introducing prospective policy changes to bar the Chinese from getting too comfortable within the automotive and energy sectors — at least those operating within the confines of North America.


China has long taken similar efforts to do the same to American brands vying to operate within its borders. While foreign automotive brands are relatively common in the Asian country these days, the Chinese government has historically forced all outside entities into creating joint ventures with domestic brands in order to do business. Despite China and the United States having a massive trade relationship, there remains a massive trade deficit that advantages China.


In 2022, the U.S. goods and services trade deficit with China was over $367 billion. Though some would argue this is the result of the United States spending decades offshoring production and becoming dependent upon foreign entities to provide goods associated with entire business sectors (e.g. medicine, textiles, home electronics, etc). It’s worth noting that the industries that the U.S. government seems particularly concerned with are those that remain influential on the domestic market — most notably energy and automotive.


Biden promised that he would "do right by autoworkers and middle-class families" dependent upon the continued existence of domestic labor. He also said the government would take additional actions to ensure the future of the automotive industry would be made in America, adding that connected vehicles from China could collect sensitive data about U.S. citizens and infrastructure. However, nothing was said about the data harvesting used by domestic companies which many (including your author) have said are completely unacceptable invasions of privacy. The same seems to go for foreign-owned brands that have been deemed friendly by the U.S. government.


[Image: The White House]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 73 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Mar 01, 2024


    "White House Vows to Investigate Security Risks Posed by Foreign-Connected Vehicle Tech"

    LOL, dem furriners are stealing our information!!!! It's funny how implied bigotry can be deployed by the same people who decry it. Then again Biden is mostly celery, so who knows which of his handlers/night nurses typed this up and hit send.


    Just once I want to see him type one of these releases with all of his infamous verbal diarrhea and rambling and have it end with just a pool of slobber at the bottom of the page. Like he left it on the kitchen counter and Dr. Jill Biden accidentally left a pile of potato chips on it.

  • Are you dumb enough to let the car connect ? .. well then you deserve it.


    But then again your cell phone is way way way way WAY worse than your car trying to snoop other access points and devices near by. And of in reality The US intelligence agency literally kills people using data brokers soooo... china is not the only one in the room abusing mobile tech

  • Peter Buying an EV from Toyota is like buying a Bible from Donald Trump. Don’t be surprised if some very important parts are left out.
  • Sheila I have a 2016 Kia Sorento that just threw a rod out of the engine case. Filed a claim for new engine and was denied…..due to a loop hole that was included in the Class Action Engine Settlement so Hyundai and Kia would be able to deny a large percentage of cars with prematurely failed engines. It’s called the KSDS Improvement Campaign. Ever hear of such a thing? It’s not even a Recall, although they know these engines are very dangerous. As unknowing consumers load themselves and kids in them everyday. Are their any new Class Action Lawsuits that anyone knows of?
  • Alan Well, it will take 30 years to fix Nissan up after the Renault Alliance reduced Nissan to a paltry mess.I think Nissan will eventually improve.
  • Alan This will be overpriced for what it offers.I think the "Western" auto manufacturers rip off the consumer with the Thai and Chinese made vehicles.A Chinese made Model 3 in Australia is over $70k AUD(for 1995 $45k USD) which is far more expensive than a similar Chinesium EV of equal or better quality and loaded with goodies.Chinese pickups are $20k to $30k cheaper than Thai built pickups from Ford and the Japanese brands. Who's ripping who off?
  • Alan Years ago Jack Baruth held a "competition" for a piece from the B&B on the oddest pickup story (or something like that). I think 5 people were awarded the prizes.I never received mine, something about being in Australia. If TTAC is global how do you offer prizes to those overseas or are we omitted on the sly from competing?In the end I lost significant respect for Baruth.
Next