By on April 28, 2010

The Treasury may be standing by GM’s “payback” claims, but the Congress hasn’t exactly been looking for ways to do the auto industry any favors. In fact, a toxic brew of political fallout from the financial crisis, auto bailout, and Toyota recall scandal has seems to have inspired a backlash against the industry that came to a head this week in the US Senate. Legislation has been introduced that would prevent NHTSA officials from taking jobs with automakers for up to three years after they leave the agency, and yet more is being drafted which could require a vast array of standard safety equipment on all cars sold in the US and could even add a federal fee to new car sales. Adding insult to injury, a much-hoped for exception to dealer financing oversight in the new financial reform bill appears to have fallen victim to Senate negotiations. Did nobody tell the old guys that they’re investors in the auto industry?

But it was Toyota, not the state-owned automakers, that figured most heavily in the Senate’s proposed regulatory binge. Senator Barbara Boxer (C-CA) introduced legislation aimed at ending the “revolving door” between NHTSA and industry lobbyist jobs, a topic of much discussion in the Toyota recall hearings. According to the LA Times:

Only jobs involving direct communications with NHTSA would be prohibited, and only top NHTSA officials, or those involved in safety regulation, would be subject to the rule. The bill filed by Boxer would impose a $55,000 fine on individuals and $100,000 or more for automakers, in case of a violation.

Yawn. Most automakers are probably moving in this direction anyway, what with the post-Toyota recall PR environment. The more interesting piece of legislation emerging from the Toyota hearings is a comprehensive auto safety bill that the Detroit News says is being drafted by Senate Commerce Committee chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA). According to congressional aides speaking to the DetN,

the authors are considering imposing a small fee on new car sales that would fund an increase in the budget of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

require all automakers to install anti-runaway technology, such as brake override systems, stop-start technology and event data recorders
Since when does stop-start technology have anything to do with “anti-runaway” safety? Apparently we’re going to have to wait until draft legislation is released later this week to find out. The same goes for the dealer finance oversight legislation, which appears to have died in the Senate. Republicans have only just allowed floor debate to begin on financial reform legislation, and we likely won’t hear definitive news on a possible dealer finance exception until tomorrow.
In the meantime, if you happen to be a member of the House of Representatives, and you’re starting to feel badly about how your Senate colleagues have been treating the industry, take heart. You have an opportunity to make it all right, and in a way that will largely benefit a government-owned automaker. According to the DetN, GM is joining auto suppliers and others in lobbying for the passage of changes to the Alternative Minimum Tax currently before the House [bill text here]. The changes would allow AMT credits from capital investments to be taken immediately, preventing companies from having to prepay AMT and claim credits in subsequent years. With GM announcing $2.3b in North American plant investments in the last ten months, this legislation would work out marvelously. And why make The General pay tax on the taxpayer’s money, especially the part that’s actually going towards creating new jobs?
Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

7 Comments on “Senate Moves On Auto Safety, NHTSA “Revolving Door” Legislation, Stands Firm On Dealer Finance Oversight...”


  • avatar
    Jimal

    Can’t we just simplify the whole process and save a ton of money? Abolish NHTSA and adopt the Euro NCAP standard. Have the rest of the developed world adopt our California emissions standards and then open up all (most) markets.

    • 0 avatar
      dastanley

      Your proposal makes perfect sense, but remember that the first priority of ANY government organization is self preservation first and foremost before their stated mission. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration? Yeah right. The only safety they’re truly after is job safety (security), all under the guise of highway safety.

    • 0 avatar
      rpol35

      Your proposal makes way too much sense and thusly will never happen.

      Waxman and Rockefeller are the most anti-business, anti-jobs, anti-American prowess senators in the legislative branch. I don’t know whose interests they preport to represent but they have managed to last through Democratic and Republican administrations with their strength either waxing or waning depending on which party is in power.

      They are poster children for why term limits are essential.

  • avatar
    Monty

    Okay, I’ll admit I didn’t actually read the post or any of the links.

    That Imperial in the photo needs to be in my driveway, like now. Stat.

    Alright, back to reading.

  • avatar
    geozinger

    “In the meantime, if you happen to be a member of the House of Representatives, and you’re starting to feel badly about how your Senate colleagues have been treating the industry, take heart. You have an opportunity to make it all right, and in a way that will largely benefit a government-owned automaker…”

    So which is it? Is the gov’t helping or hurting their investment? Is this part of the conspiracy to kill the competition or to kill GM? I can’t seem to keep up with the twist and turns of logic here.

    OTOH, I looooove the Imp. Maybe we could get a law passed to build those things again.

  • avatar
    Accazdatch

    Ya know…

    We could avoid all of this b.s and hassle.. if only everyone listened to me…

    Start producing STICK SHIFTS instead of automatics.

    Let people finally start driving their cars.. instead of this.. b.s.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Re: Inside Stories From the War Between Automakers And Dealers Over Exports

    jthorner - It is well established law that once a person buys a product they are free to resell it when and where they like....
  • Re: 2016 Ford Escape SE AWD Rental Review

    Japanese Buick - Count me among the AUX jack enthusiasts. It’s good to have available for when the Bluetooth glitches out and the phone and car blame each other...
  • Re: Full-size SUVs Aren’t Taking Part in the SUV Boom

    Lou_BC - stuki – that is why the USA and others ousted Democratically elected governments and installed Dictators. It is much easier to make...
  • Re: Full-size SUVs Aren’t Taking Part in the SUV Boom

    Lou_BC - JohnTaurus_3.0_AX4N – correct. IIRC there was a torture chamber set up in a Ford factory in Chile. The Falcons for the most part were...
  • Re: Ramcharger Rebirth

    Lou_BC - @Hummer – most Tahoe’s, Suburban’s and other large SUV’s I see are almost always driven by women.
  • Re: Ramcharger Rebirth

    Lou_BC - @Mason – those transport trucks are running up to 16 litre engines i.e. 16,000 cc. Horsepower by definition is a unit of power equal to moving 550 foot-pounds per second....
  • Re: Ramcharger Rebirth

    Lou_BC - Vulpine – my F150 does the same thing. Chevy is the same. That 36 mph threshold must be a federally mandated thing. The only time I find it to be an issue is driving...
  • Re: Ramcharger Rebirth

    Lou_BC - “People who buy full-sized, truck-based SUVs do it because it’s the only vehicle that will meet their needs.” Not entirely – I see plenty of full sized BOF...
  • Re: Ramcharger Rebirth

    Lou_BC - more like Bronco III
  • Re: New York 2015: Chevrolet Spark Revealed

    kkollwitz - Drove a 2016 LS CVT today and bought it for my daughter. I have not driven a 2015, but was very impressed with the 2016’s power and handling, as...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Bark M., United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic

Get No-holds-barred, take-no-prisoners Automotive News in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked