By on March 26, 2010

I’m running out of gratuitous tie-up pictures, so let’s celebrate the good news with a video: The Nikkei [sub] sends us the news that Nissan and Daimler “are in the final stages of negotiations to obtain stakes of less than 5 percent  in each other.” This comes on the heels of yesterday’s news that Daimler and Renault will exchange shares. With Nissan joining the couple, the tripartite axis will be perfect. No Italians this time.

The Nikkei found out that Renault Chairman Carlos Ghosn, who doubles as the president of Nissan, had a meeting with senior executives at Nissan’s headquarters in Yokohama yesterday, to brief them on the shibari talks with Daimler. The Nipponese Nissan-san  immediately wanted to be tied-in also.

“Various options are being discussed,” said a senior Nissan official to the Nikkei last night. Seeking independent confirmation, the Nikkei found another loose-lipped Nissan exec who said that “cross-held stakes of around 1-2 percent were being considered.”

A final agreement about the ménage à trois is expected by early April.

PS: Just in case you wanted to know,  the guy in the video says: “I made the decision to get married to you.” Cosplay makes you say these things.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!


6 Comments on “Renault, Nissan And Daimler To Be Tied-Up In Unholy Matrimony...”

  • avatar
    Cammy Corrigan

    I find that video deeply disturbing.

    If any bloke tried that with me, I’d panel them!

  • avatar

    And probably the Frenchies won’t allow the Germans to walk all over them like Chrysler did. Could something good come of this? Doubt it though. Too many cultural divides. Asking French and germans to work together is much harder than having Japs in the fray…Just saying.

    • 0 avatar

      Old cliches die hard. The French and the Germans have been buddy-buddies since Adenauer and de Gaulle. Cornerstones of the EU. Daimler has long experience working successfully with French companies under the French government umbrella. Remember Airbus and EADS?

    • 0 avatar

      Yeah, you’re right. I expressed myself badly. Your examples are proof positive that your right and that I was indeeed streriotyping. My bad. Let me try to clear up what I’m trying to say.

      What I really meant was that :

      1 – As that I’m favorable to choice and variation in cars, I think this kind of alliance (though economically sound) leads to the further homogeinization of cars. Not good in my book.

      2 – I think both the French and Germans are good to work with, thugh they have a strong tendency to become hard-headed or near-sighted when they deem it necessary. In other words, they play ball when they want, but will do what they think is necessary if a question of “national” interest comes up.

      Hope that what I’m saying above is clearer, more thoughtful and less streriotypical. Again sorry for that and thanks for calling me out on it.

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • BobNelson: Tim, “Tribalism, man. Tribalism. I see it in every political debate on every topic. Pick a side and...
  • Scottdb: @Featherston, The only thing that kept a CCC Quadrajet car running was a mechanic who knew *exactly* what to...
  • BobNelson: Syke, “Because I prefer to buy my electric car as a car. Not as a statement of saving the world, or...
  • bd2: Not surprisingly, DW’s account of Hyundai’s reliability not improving is WRONG. Hyundai is at the...
  • BobNelson: ” Most fossil fuel subsidies are for low income energy assistance programs, tax breaks on fuel used...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Seth Parks, United States
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Kyree Williams, United States