Dealer Arbitration GM's "Top Challenge" For 2010

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

GM has a tough row to hoe in 2010, with the launches of key products like the Cruze and Volt going on sale, an IPO to worry about, and a sales slide (down 30 percent for 2009) to reverse. Still, according to GM’s new North American boss Mark Reuss, navigating the congressionally-mandated dealer arbitration is the top challenge of the coming year. At a speech last night, Reuss told reporters from Automotive News [sub] that:

I welcome this as an opportunity for GM and the dealership network to go through a change in our network with integrity,

As opposed to the arbitrary bankruptcy-era dealer cull?



According to Reuss, the other challenges on his list have more to do with the bread and butter of GM’s business, including “marketing GM’s vehicles and brands and improving customer relationships so that Americans have enough confidence to buy a GM model.” Reuss explains that “that equals profitable retail share growth.”

Still, as TTAC has reported, and Reuss confirmed to Bloomberg, profitable retail share means fewer discounts, although The General is still dropping prices on such allegedly “hot” cars as the Malibu and CTS sedans. Is there a difference between dropping a price and putting cash on the hood? If Reuss thinks so, there’s been nobody to ask him yet.

Meanwhile, GM is still addicted to incentives, using cash on the hood to move new models, old models, strong sellers and old dogs. Until that gets fixed, bringing up transaction prices while retaining volume remains a challenge that should at the top of any GM exec’s list of things to do in 2010. After all, bloated inventories and forced discounting is the biggest strain on relations between GM and its dealers, according to executives from AutoNation and Group 1 dealer groups speaking to Automotive News [sub].

Instead, GM is looking at more production to reach what Sales Boss Susan Docherty describes as an ideal of “at least” 60 days supply of vehicles like its Theta-platform compact CUVs. BusinessWeek reports

GM used to “refuse to add capacity” for specific models, Lutz said. “This is why we have never been able to add market share, because we wouldn’t roll the dice and go with the winners.”

Perhaps, but overproduction also caught GM in the brand- and market share-destroying cycle of inventory binges and incentive-driven purges. Given the uncertainty around the larger auto market for 2010, and GM’s market share, erring on the side of caution might not be a horrible idea.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 8 comments
  • CarPerson CarPerson on Jan 13, 2010

    Did matching the Chevy dealership floor tile in Seattle and Wichita fall from grace already? Good.

  • Getacargetacheck Getacargetacheck on Jan 13, 2010

    This dealer arbitration thing is just going to slow GM down even more. Pity really. And their unique brands for every market approach seems antiquated in a globalized world. The "One Ford" model is just going to eat GM's lunch even further. And GMC, Buick and Cadillac may have decent product but the image and marketing sucks which will not help these small brands gain traction. And maybe the product isn't all that great either: really, isn't the XTS just an AWD LaCrosse with a bigger trunk? Meanwhile, Chevrolet (in essence GM) flounders with hype and promises and incentives.

    • See 1 previous
    • Psarhjinian Psarhjinian on Jan 13, 2010

      Steven, The ES350 is often called a fancy Camry. The XTS' problem isn't that it's a big, snazzy LaCrosse, it's that it's a big, snazzy LaCrosse being pitched as a E- or S-Class competitor. Were it an ES competitor, I don't think anyone would care, but GM's erstwhile ES/TL competitor is the Lacrosse itself. Are you implying the Lacrosse competes with the XTS? Because that would be so GM.

  • Lorenzo They won't be sold just in Beverly Hills - there's a Nieman-Marcus in nearly every big city. When they're finally junked, the transfer case will be first to be salvaged, since it'll be unused.
  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
  • Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
Next