Opinion: The Tesla Cybertruck Won't Change the Game

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Now that I've had nearly a week to digest the Tesla Cybertruck news, I've come to the conclusion that the Cybertruck will neither revolutionize the automotive market nor be such a flop that it kills Tesla.


Yes, I wrote a while back that the truck would be a sales flop. I still think it could be, though obviously "flop" is relative to what Tesla expects. Perhaps the company has more realistic expectations than what we've seen publicly.

Based on the specs we covered last week and the truck's aesthetics and pricing, I think the Cybertruck is going to sell to a limited number of customers.

Those customers will be a mix of Tesla loyalists, those who actually think it looks good, and folks who want to have the most interesting ride. Some celebrities and other wealthy folk are a mix of all three.

I don't think the average truck buyer who's thinking EV is going to move away from a Ford Lightning or Rivian -- the Cybertruck appears to be limited in its ability to be used for utilitarian purposes. Maybe not as limited as some of its harshest critics suggested during the long lead up between the unveiling of the prototype and last week's official launch, but still not quite on par with a traditional truck that happens to have an EV powertrain.

There's no doubt you'll see Cybertrucks in the wealthiest parts of LA, and in Silicon Valley, and at valet stands at hot restaurants across the country. I don't think you'll see many used for towing or off-roading.

I could be wrong -- opinions and predictions often are. But I just don't see Johnny the electrician, Mary the Rancher, or Jennifer the horse breeder buying these trucks for work purposes.

This is not Tesla hate or as I've seen it elsewhere, some form of derangement syndrome. And admittedly I, like most people, have yet to drive the vehicle or even see it in person. I am basing this early judgment off of reported specs and pictures.

Personally, I don't HATE the Cybertruck. I don't love its looks, though it's not the ugliest mass-production vehicle I've ever seen (that honor probably still belongs to the Pontiac Aztek). I might enjoy driving it -- I won't know for a while, if ever. I just don't think it's going to move the needle as a utility vehicle -- it's going to sell to certain types of buyers, as mentioned above.

That might still be enough for Tesla to make a profit, or at least not nearly bad enough to bring doom for the company, as some naysayers have predicted.

One need not hate a vehicle to think it won't be some revolutionary product.

The Cybertruck may or may not be a flop. But it's not going to be a megahit.

[Images: Tesla]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 73 comments
  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on Dec 07, 2023

    There's no need to rely solely on published specs anymore; there are YouTube reviews from people who've actually driven the CT. Sandy Monroe interviewed Elon Musk and discussed the CT technology at length.


    The CT is not a "bet the company" product for Tesla. It's more of a technology development platform--the new technology being the 4680 cell, 800V architecture, steer-by-wire, 4 wheel steering, CAN over ethernet, 48V low-voltage system, etc.


    The "low cost" Tesla currently in development is a much more important product for them. Elon claims the manufacturing technology for this new product is revolutionary, and a radical departure from what is currently done by other manufacturers. It probably involves one giant casting for the whole body.


    The Tesla cars on offer now are not my cup of tea, but I must admit that Elon is running rings around the rest of the industry in terms of technological innovation.

    • See 5 previous
    • VoGhost VoGhost on Dec 08, 2023

      Tesla didn't invent the circle. It invented the squircle steering wheel.


  • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Dec 07, 2023

    "Yes, I wrote a while back that the truck would be a sales flop. "


    Not sure if it will be a hit, but I doubt a flop - it will sell well and perhaps very well depending on eventual pricing. If they put GM Hummer EV money on it as I assume (at first) sales will be limited. But if in a year this becomes the new "Model S" being the step above model from the more plebian 3/Y (say 20-30K+) but still in the 5%er ballpark, I think it will sell well and perhaps even become a hit.


    "I don't think the average truck buyer who's thinking EV is going to move away from a Ford Lightning or Rivian"


    I disagree, if someone is in the market for this class they know about the CyberTruck. They may not like the CT, but they are also aware Tesla is the only company to have put out a serious BEV which despite a lot of build quality issues does seem to deliver on its promises. Rivian should be commended, but they are Tesla ten years ago and will suffer similar teething issues. Ford is in complete disarray with nearly all of its products, only very loyal Ford buyers are looking at Lightning. If I was in the market I would hold off for another year to see if a less, shall we say ostentatious, CyberTruck appears (or even body kits or something to refine the polarizing look which I think turns off otherwise surefire buyers).


    "the Cybertruck appears to be limited in its ability to be used for utilitarian purposes."


    Just like "SUV"s.


    "I don't think you'll see many used for towing or off-roading."


    Just like "SUV"s. You also won't see many Rivians or F150 Lightnings either if any at all.


    "I could be wrong -- opinions and predictions often are. But I just don't see Johnny the electrician, Mary the Rancher, or Jennifer the horse breeder buying these trucks for work purposes."


    They're also not buying the Rivians or Lightnings either. The electrical contractor whose shop is behind the building I recently bought told me he mostly runs vans but also has a Chevy 1500 2WD W/T beater like most trades/construction people. However his personal truck is a 2021ish Raptor, no joke. The Lightning came up in a conversation, and being an electrician this man is a fan of BEV but he said there was no way he wasn't getting the Raptor after he profited well enough on his 2018 F150 trading in 2022 (somehow bought the 2018 new-used or off lease or something and claimed he made 20 or 30K on it).

    • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Dec 08, 2023

      This may depend on market. Anecdote isn't data blah blah, but there is a midsize construction site near me (9 townhomes) and one day this week there were no fewer than 3 E-transits from different subs parked at it. The plumbing company seems to be fully electrified, the window installer has one, and I couldn't tell whose the third one was, but it got my attention.


  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next