Auto Industry Assets Could Be Seized by Russian Nationalization

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

The war in Ukraine continues to have ripple effects.

A new report from industry bible Automotive News suggests Vladimir Putin is considering seizing the assets of automakers who left Russia in the wake of its invasion of Ukraine.

Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Renault, Stellantis, and Volkswagen are among the companies that left Russia behind in the wake of the fighting. Putin is apparently proposing nationalizing these and other companies, using the euphemism “external management.” Isn’t it grand how corporations and governments can use neutral-sounding buzzwords to soften the blow of misdeeds?

This is all in response to sanctions that are causing Russia pain.

“If foreign owners close the company unreasonably, then in such cases the government proposes to introduce external administration,” Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin reportedly said this month, according to CNN. “Depending on the decision of the owner, it will determine the future fate of the enterprise.”

At least one analyst thinks there’s a risk Putin and company will make good on their threats.

“I think it’s a high risk,” Joe McCabe, CEO of AutoForecast Solutions, told Automotive News. “Putin’s not shy about walking away from an industry that supports employment in his country, that builds product for local consumers. There are high odds that companies that have left, or ones that are leaving, are nationalized for the sake of his country’s economy.”

There’s a lot of money at stake — Mercedes-Benz, for example, has about $2.2 billion dollars of assets at risk of seizure, including a plant that opened near Moscow in 2019.

Analysts point out that even if Russia seizes plants, it won’t be a simple matter to restart assembly lines. That’s because Russia is cut off from global trade and wouldn’t be able to source components.

Unless, of course, it got help from a friendly nation like China. But analysts also point out the Chinese might not help the Russians, since aiding a country with inferior technology that’s waging an unpopular war might not be in China’s best interest.

The report says automakers always knew nationalization was a possibility, which is why they’ve limited their production investments in Russia. Automakers also won’t be likely to feel too much of a financial pinch.

That said, a couple of OEMs might take it on the chin more than others. Russia accounts for 2.1 percent of global car sales, but it’s 5.7 percent for Hyundai and 7.8 for the Renault/Mitsubishi/Nissan alliance. There’s also this: Analysts say that even if the plants do restart production, it will be at a lower volume than normal because of — say it with me — Russia’s economic troubles.

[Image: Ford. Note: The plant shown is in Kansas, not Russia, and the photo is for illustrative purposes.]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 50 comments
  • Redapple2 HK: The Redapple is the TTAC resident HK hater. I have listed the reasons before. But, I am smart enough to keep my eyes open. I will say this. Overall, they have the best styling/design in autodum. I may not like certain models, but overall, they try. They try something new, different, fresh. Some models are great. Some so-so. But they are TRYING- All the time. Year after year. Other brands are locked into a firm theme - across multiple models and brands. Some lasting decades EX. Evil gm vampire Cadillac Arts and Science has been around for 22 years. Flawed fugly from the start. Never got better.
  • SCE to AUX This is the right direction for EVs, but I can't warm up to Kia's latest styling.This is bad news for Rivian, whose similarly-specced R3 isn't due until 2027 or something.Perhaps a low-spec version will start at $30k (maybe), but the 300-mile version with trimmings will certainly run closer to $50k. Then everyone will say Kia lied.
  • Buickman foolishness has no bounds, or borders.
  • JMII Wonder what the Hyundai version will look like because I am NOT a fan of this styling.Also someone needs to explain to H/K/G that you want the dark colored interior parts were you touch/sit and the lighter color parts elsewhere. For example the door panels here are dark with light armrests - this is backwards. Genesis made the same mistake in the GV60's white/ash (grey) interior. While I greatly appreciate something other then the dreaded black cave interior did they not consider how impossible this will be to keep clean in the real world?
  • JMII I see lots of ads for their CUVs but given the competition in this segment why would I buy an Outlander over a similar product from Toyota, Honda or Hyundai? Mitsubishi needs to offer something compelling, some hook or defining difference. I don't think I've encountered a single person who says "wow have you seen the new [blank] from Mitsubishi? I need to get me one of those".I owned a Mitsubishi Eclipse GS-T back in '96 and it was fun car. Mitsubishi once made interesting choices with a rally heritage - those cars were fast and pretty high tech at the time. Like Nissan they kind of fell into the we will finance anyone pool so other then an Evo as a track toy anyone I knew steered clear of them.
Next