Rare Rides: The Especially Forgotten 1978 Dodge Aspen Kit Car

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

The standard Dodge Aspen and Plymouth Volare are primarily remembered (and not seen) because they rusted as soon as the dew settled on them on a spring morning. While that makes standard examples sort of rare today, there’s a very special model which was very rare from the beginning.

It’s the 1978 Dodge Aspen Kit Car, and that’s its real name.

The Aspen and Volare twins were Chrysler’s replacements for the discontinued Dodge Dart and Plymouth Valiant. Since the Aspen was an all-new car, it suitably used the all-new F-body platform. Available in two wheelbases, 108.7 inches (two-door cars) and 112.7 inches (four-doors), the F was technically short-lived. We say technically because for 1981 the F was “replaced” by the long lived M-body, which was nearly identical in every way, including wheelbases.

Let’s take a trip to Aspen.

Introduced for the 1976 model year, the Aspen and Dart were sold alongside one another for a very short while. Chrysler was careful in the design of its new car: Extensive aerodynamic principles were applied during the Aspen’s development. Drag reduction, ventilation, crosswind stability, and wind noise considerations all shaped the new coupe, sedan, and wagon. Computers even played a part!

Underneath, mechanical bits were not as adventurous. The base engine was a 225 cubic inch (3.7L) Slant-6. Less fuel-conscious customers selected from the 318 (5.2L) and 360 (5.9L) LA series V8s. Transmissions were all of three-speed variety, one of which Chrysler sold through the mid-2000s. A single manual transmission was offered, through Chrysler switched between two different versions of the TorqueFlite automatic during Aspen’s run.

Upon their introduction, Motor Trend blessed the Aspen and Volare with the 1976 Car of the Year award. Chrysler’s new compacts were a hit! Things were mostly status quo until 1978, which heralded the introduction of a very special Aspen two-door.

Known as the Kit Car, it was the only Aspen made to look like a race car. Chrysler built its Kit Car to honor of NASCAR driver Richard Petty. Visual changes included bolted-on, flared wheel arches, tie-down points for the windshield and hood, extra rear window trims, and a large spoiler. Chrysler saved some glue by deleting the exterior badging, then used said glue on the side window louvers. Setting off the racer look were unadorned steel wheels, with no available hubcaps. Unlike other sporty Aspens (and perhaps a bit oddly), the Kit Car came only with an automatic transmission. At least it had the 360 V8.

Options for buyers were very limited, and included a decal kit with a large “43” for the door, and some 360 stickers for the hood. The dealer could install these, or owners could just do it themselves ⁠— options! Just 145 Kit Cars were made, and all were the same color.

Given the aforementioned rust issues shipped standard with each Aspen, surely very few remain today. The Aspen itself was not long for the world after 1978: It was cancelled at the end of 1980, as the exciting and efficient new K-cars were ready. Today’s Rare Ride was listed for sale for a very short time before seeing its listing removed. In excellent condition, the Kit Car asked $15,900.

[Images: seller]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 52 comments
  • Bobmaxed Bobmaxed on May 10, 2020

    I never saw one on the streets but I'm positive I saw quite a few of these on the race tracks used by the USAC (or maybe ARCA) Stock Car division. These were replacing the Chargers and Belvidere's This was before Nascar started to invade the mid-west. Rusty Wallace and Mark Martin were super stars in these leagues before they moved to Nascar. I don't think these Chrysler products were very successful on the track

  • Teddyc73 Teddyc73 on May 11, 2020

    Not just forgotten but "especially" forgotten.

  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
Next