Can We Interest You in a Cruze? GM Claims Ford/FCA's Loss Is It's Gain

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s gotten to the point where those seen buying a traditional sedan or hatchback are viewed as being unlikely candidates for procreation. After all, you can’t raise a kid in the absence of a vehicle belonging to a segment where “rows” matters more than horsepower or fuel economy. I blame Lee Iacocca for sparking the non-car trend.

Anyway, with Fiat Chrysler out of the small and medium-sized car game, and Ford eager to follow, General Motors feels this new automotive landscape could work to its advantage. Never mind all that doom and gloom (and some very GM-centric rumors).

Speaking to Automotive News, Alan Batey, GM’s North America president, expressed a sentiment heard when Chevrolet brought back the Cruze diesel in numerous configurations as a way of soaking up disgruntled Volkswagen devotees. That sentiment being keep building it, and they will come.

“We have to continue to listen to our customers and react to their needs,” said Batey.

“And right now, there’s a lot of customers that want to buy cars, and they’re big segments. That some of our competitors have decided to exit them, that just creates a bigger opportunity for us.”

The jury’s out on just how many new customers GM might attract from the impending loss of the Fiesta, Focus (in sedan form, anyway), Fusion, and Taurus. With sales of those vehicles dropping markedly in recent years, any bump to GM’s volume could be short-lived. However, it could help extend the lifespan of its passenger car models to some degree.

Earlier this year, rumors arose of the impending demise of the Chevrolet Sonic and Impala, though the smaller of the two did stage a reappearance on regulatory documents for the 2019 model year. Large cars are in the worst shape these days. GM’s Hamtramck assembly plant staged an extended shutdown late last year, and small cars aren’t sitting comfortably, either. Thanks o bulging inventories, downtime became common at the Chevrolet Cruze’s Lordstown, Ohio plant in the past year, with now runs on one shift — down from three when the model debuted.

Batey said he sees no need for further downtime in 2018, but admits things can change in a hurry.

“Based on what I know today, I think we’re in a good position and I don’t see any further downtime against our car plants,” he said. “But, again, if something happens and we see a shift, then we’ll react to it.”

As for the Sonic and Impala’s future, Batey remained tight-lipped.

While Ford sees a future filled with EVs and crossovers, that doesn’t mean no one bought its cars. Sure, it seems the Focus sedan is most often seen performing some sort of fleet duty, but U.S. sales still totalled 158,385 in 2017 (down from 269,272 five years earlier). The Blue Oval also sold 46,249 Fiestas, 209,623 Fusions, and 41,236 Tauruses last year.

As Automotive News points out, GM’s passenger cars sales shrank 18 percent last year, but it also has more available manufacturing capacity compared to Ford. This decreases the need to jettison low-profit models in order to free up room for big-buck SUVs and trucks.

Meanwhile, Hyundai, Toyota, and Honda have no intention of dropping their own traditional passenger cars. Even if Ford owners want to remain in the segment, the market offers plenty of choice. That should be enough to worry GM.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 74 comments
  • Carroll Prescott Carroll Prescott on Jul 05, 2018

    I can assure you that no self-respecting Ford buyer would ever buy a Chevrolet. I'd buy a used Ford before ever considering a product run by the Witch Bara and their taxpayer money thieves.

  • HotPotato HotPotato on Jul 06, 2018

    The first Cruze was an inexpensive car that drove like an expensive car. The way they're equipped in dealer stock, the new Cruze is an expensive car that can't quite justify its price. A bit similar to what happened to the Mazda 3. But no matter how much we all liked the first Cruze based on our test drives, owners didn't: it was one of the two most-traded cars after one year (the other was the Buick Regal, famous for annoying every traditional Buick buyer who didn't realize in time that they were actually buying a flinty German sport tourer with a child-size rear seat). Maybe because the Gen 1 Cruze's base 1.8 liter powerplant was awful, maybe because the Gen 1 Cruze's exterior was styled by the Sears Craftsman screwdriver design team, who knows, but there was presumably something GM was hearing from owners that made them want to make changes. I haven't driven the old and new Cruze back to back. I have driven the old and new Volt back to back, the Volt being a Cruze derived product. The difference is stark: the old one rode much better, due in part no doubt to an isolated front subframe, but the new one has a sporty directness to the handling. Frankly I prefer the old way: if you're not giving me 20% quicker steering too, then don't make the suspension feel like you removed 20% of the travel.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next