Paranoid of the Government? BMW's Got Your Back

by Steph Willems

March 13th, 2018 2:12 PM

paranoid of the government bmws got your back

As sometimes happens, there’s a war brewing in the heart of Europe. This one isn’t like the others, though — instead of nation versus nation, it’s a case of lawmakers versus privately owned vehicles, primarily those of the diesel persuasion.

So eager are some city governments to ban the operation of diesel-powered cars and trucks in or near urban centers, BMW Group has taken the unusual step of issuing a promise. In a bid to allay fears of new (or newish) vehicles becoming useless to their owners, the automaker claims it will let German lessees return their diesel vehicles and switch to a gas-powered model.

Don’t worry about the government, BMW wants its customers to know. Just enjoy that compression ignition engine while you can.

Bimmer’s diesel return promise works like this: If you’re leasing a vehicle when a driving ban goes into effect within a 100 kilometer (62 mile) radius of your home, the automaker will allow you to enter into a “comparable termination agreement” for another BMW Group vehicle. Obvious, a gasoline-powered vehicle would be the go-to, though you’ll really cover your ass by picking up some sort of hybrid.

The promise goes into effect on March 15th.

It amounts to peace of mind for nervous customers and would-be customers, but this isn’t the only “protection” on offer. Owners of BMW Group vehicles conforming to the older Euro 4 emissions standard (or its predecessors) are eligible for incentives on certain new vehicles. These include the electric BMW i3, plug-in hybrid models, or new BMW and Mini vehicles that comply with the Euro 6 standard. The incentive amounts to roughy $2,500.

While this promise also goes into effect on March 15th, it’s shelf life is short. The incentive dries up at the end of June. BMW claims the offer, clearly designed to get stubborn owners into showrooms, was made in the interest of fleet renewal and overall emissions reduction.

Diesel owners have a right to feel worried in Germany. The country’s top court recently ruled that cities and towns are within their legal rights to ban the operation of certain vehicles that pose a public health threat. It’s not just Germany, either — major hubs like London, Paris, Athens, and Madrid have proposed similar types of bans.

Seemingly, no internal combustion car is safe in the birthplace of the internal combustion car.

[Image: BMW]

#BMW #CarBan #Diesel #DieselBan #Germany #Government #Green #Incentives #LawAndOrder #Leasing

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 8 comments

TomLU86 on Mar 14, 2018

Commute in a Miata and drive diesel 2x a year when you need it. Sounds good, but... you can't let a vehicle sit for months on end. Not to mention space it takes up. Maybe if people could rent trucks as needed, then they could use more efficient cars as daily drivers.

Like Reply
ThomasSchiffer on Mar 14, 2018

The absurdity and unfairness of these diesel bans really infuriatates me. You cannot convince me that this is being done as a means of improving public health, because owners of certain thirsty gasoline-powered cars (such as heavy SUVs and exotic sports cars) will be permitted to enter the city and pollute. Furthermore, if ‘public health’ and ‘air improvement’ were genuine reasons for this ban, then the government should also ban public smoking, industry, shipping and air travel. The air quality in Germany has continually improved since the 1970s. In fact most of the pollution, particulates and NOx are created by the industry, air travel and shipping - NOT diesel cars. This is why I do not believe the ‘public health’ argument. How absurd is it that my 2007 GL320 CDI EURO 5 will soon be banned from the city, but my beater 1995 Renault Twingo with EURO 2 (!!!) gets a free pass? Objectively seen the Renault is a dirtier car than the Mercedes diesel SUV. I didn’t buy my diesel cars because I wanted to ‘poison people’, I bought them because I need the fuel economy (and range) due to the fact that I tend to average 40,000 km a year. With a gasoline-powered vehicle my fuel costs would be stratospheric. Public transportation is out of the question because my work requires that I am mobile at all times. But I am not surprised. This is typical of the ‘shoot-first-ask-questions-later’ mentality of our idiot politicians and the fake news media which sells sensationalism.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Aidian Holder I'm not interested in buying anything from a company that deliberately targets all their production in crappy union-busting states. Ford decided to build their EV manufaturing in Tennessee. The company built it there because of an anti-union legal environment. I won't buy another Ford because of that. I've owned four Fords to date -- three of them pickups. I'm shopping for a new one. It won't be a Ford Lightning. If you care about your fellow workers, you won't buy one either.
Denis Jeep have other cars?!?
Darren Mertz In 2000, after reading the glowing reviews from c/d in 1998, I decided that was the car for me (yep, it took me 2 years to make up my mind). I found a 1999 with 24k on the clock at a local Volvo dealership. I think the salesman was more impressed with it than I was. It was everything I had hoped for. Comfortable, stylish, roomy, refined, efficient, flexible, ... I can't think of more superlatives right now but there are likely more. I had that car until just last year at this time. A red light runner t-boned me and my partner who was in the passenger seat. The cops estimate the other driver hit us at about 50 mph - on a city street. My partner wasn't visibly injured (when the seat air bag went off it shoved him out of the way of the intruding car) but his hip was rather tweaked. My car, though, was gone. I cried like a baby when they towed it away. I ruminated for months trying to decide how to replace it. Luckily, we had my 1998 SAAB 9000 as a spare car to use. I decided early on that there would be no new car considered. I loathe touch screens. I'm also not a fan of climate control. Months went by. I decided to keep looking for another B5 Passat. As the author wrote, the B5.5 just looked 'over done'. October this past year I found my Cinderella slipper - an early 2001. Same silver color. Same black leather interior. Same 1.8T engine. Same 5 speed manual transmission. I was happier than a pig in sh!t. But a little sad also. I had replaced my baby. But life goes on. I drive it every day to work which takes me over some rather twisty freeway ramps. I love the light snarel as I charge up some steep hills on my way home. So, I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Passat guy.
Paul Mezhir As awful as the styling was on these cars, they were beautifully assembled and extremely well finished for the day. The doors closed solidly, the ride was extremely quiet and the absence of squeaks and rattles was commendable. As for styling? Everything's beautiful in it's own way.....except for the VI coupe....it's proportions were just odd: the passenger compartment and wheelbase seemed to be way too short, especially compared to the VI sedan. Even the short-lived Town Coupe had much better proportions. None of the fox-body Lincolns could compare to the beautiful proportions of the Mark V.....it was the epitome of long, low, sleek and elegant. The proportions were just about perfect from every angle.
ToolGuy Silhouetting yourself on a ridge like that is an excellent way to get yourself shot ( Skylining)."Don't you know there's a special military operation on?"