Don't Go All Hybrid/Turbo/Electric/Fuel Cell Just Yet - Toyota V6 And V8 to Gain "Dynamic Force" Camry Engine Tech

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain
dont go all hybrid turbo electric fuel cell just yet toyota v6 and v8 to gain

Forget hybrids. Set aside, for this moment, plug-in hybrids as well. Ignore the EV hubbub and the pie-in-the-sky hydrogen fuel cells. While you’re at it, remove turbochargers and their accompanying displacement reductions from your memory, too.

The naturally aspirated internal combustion engine has legs. The proof is in the 2018 Toyota Camry’s 2.5-liter Dynamic Force four-cylinder. With no hybrid assist, no turbos, no cord that plugs into your garage wall, and no futuristic fuel source, the new Camry 2.5-liter produces 206 horsepower and hits 41 miles per gallon on the highway on regular 87 octane.

That’s 16-percent more power 24-percent more highway mpg than the 2017 Camry’s 2.5-liter four-cylinder. With improvements in conventional, naturally aspirated, gas-fired engines occurring in such leaps and bounds, it’s no wonder Toyota has bigger plans for the Dynamic Force blueprint.

According to Ben Schlimme, Toyota’s executive program manager for powertrains, says “Dynamic Force is not solely aimed at the 2.5-liter engine.” According to Automotive News, Schlimme says the tech featured in the Camry’s 2.5 is destined for other segments, and V6 and V8 editions are now in concept form.

Getting the 2.5 to make substantially more power, without turbocharging and without harming efficiency, involved focusing on good ol’ fashioned fundamentals: friction, air flow, and cooling. Fundamental ideals for engineers, they may be, but enhancing the powerplant required new approaches: “high-speed combustion technology and a variable control system,” Toyota says, with a widened angle between intake and exhaust valves, a laser-cladded valve seat, and “strengthened tumble flow and high performance injector” which improve the fuel/air mixture, among other changes.

Much of the work Toyota did to the 2.5-liter is based on the need to improve the efficiency of its hybrids. “Our electrification pathway relies on these improvements of our internal-combustion engine,” Schlimme says, “hence we put a lot of effort ensuring that this base engine delivers on those principles.”

It doesn’t sound like Toyota is preparing us for a 2025 in which there will be few dealers, a near-100-percent electric fleet, and extensive ride-sharing in autonomous Ubers. You’ll recall Mazda’s belief: internal combustion engines are in the works until at least 2050.

Whether Toyota takes conventional engines that far won’t soon be determined. But if the next iteration of the 2.5-liter Toyota four-cylinder makes similar advances, and if Toyota applies similar improvements to V6 and V8 engines, we won’t be disappointed by missing battery packs and absent turbochargers.

[Images: Toyota]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and and the founder and former editor of Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Join the conversation
2 of 102 comments
  • John John on Aug 12, 2017

    While I wouldn't want to deprive the TTAC keyboard warriors the delight they attain in demeaning each other, I wonder if anyone has done an actual study comparing similar turbocharged and non-turbocharged engines? I'm old enough to remember when engines needed to be rebuilt at the 80-100,000 mile mark, and automakers struggled to achieve 20mpg in economy cars, with engines that produced double digit horsepower. However you look at it, this is a stunning achievement for Toyota.

  • Andreroy55 Andreroy55 on Aug 14, 2017

    "a laser-cladded valve seat"?? Just what the flip is that? Sounds like something taken from the promotional material.

  • Nrd515 Usually for me it's been Arby's for pretty much forever, except when the one near my house dosed me with food poisoning twice in about a year. Both times were horrible, but the second time was just so terrible it's up near the top of my medical horror stories, and I have a few of those. Obviously, I never went to that one again. I'm still pissed at Arby's for dropping Potato Cakes, and Culver's is truly better anyway. It will be Arby's fish for my "cheat day", when I eat what I want. No tartar sauce and no lettuce on mine, please. And if I get a fish and a French Dip & Swiss? Keep the Swiss, and the dip, too salty. Just the meat and the bread for me, thanks. The odds are about 25% that they will screw one or both of them up and I will have to drive through again to get replacement sandwiches. Culver's seems to get my order right many times in a row, but if I hurry and don't check my order, that's when it's screwed up and garbage to me. My best friend lives on Starbucks coffee. I don't understand coffee's appeal at all. Both my sister and I hate anything it's in. It's like green peppers, they ruin everything they touch. About the only things I hate more than coffee are most condiments, ranked from most hated to..who cares..[list=1][*]Tartar sauce. Just thinking about it makes me smell it in my head. A nod to Ranch here too. Disgusting. [/*][*]Mayo. JEEEEZUS! WTF?[/*][*]Ketchup. Sweet puke tasting sludge. On my fries? Salt. [/*][*]Mustard. Yikes. Brown, yellow, whatever, it's just awful.[/*][*]Pickles. Just ruin it from the pickle juice. No. [/*][*]Horsey, Secret, whatever sauce. Gross. [/*][*]American Cheese. American Sleeze. Any cheese, I don't want it.[/*][*]Shredded lettuce. I don't hate it, but it's warm and what's the point?[/*][*]Raw onion. Totally OK, but not something I really want. Grilled onions is a whole nother thing, I WANT those on a burger.[/*][*]Any of that "juice" that Subway and other sandwich places want to put on. NO, HELL NO! Actually, move this up to #5. [/*][/list=1]
  • SPPPP It seems like a really nice car that's just still trying to find its customer.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird I owned an 87 Thunderbird aka the second generation aero bird. It was a fine driving comfortable and very reliable car. Quite underrated compared to the GM G-body mid sized coupes since unlike them they had rack and pinion steering and struts on all four wheels plus fuel injection which GM was a bit late to the game on their mid and full sized cars. When I sold it I considered a Mark VII LSC which like many had its trouble prone air suspension deleted and replaced with coils and struts. Instead I went for a MN-12 Thunderbird.
  • SCE to AUX Somebody got the bill of material mixed up and never caught it.Maybe the stud was for a different version (like the 4xe) which might use a different fuel tank.
  • Inside Looking Out Scandinavian design costs only $600? I mean the furniture.