Survey: Most People Are Uncomfortable With Sharing Their Driving Data

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

At this point, it’s no secret that connected cars collect an alarming amount of data on the people who own and drive them, but a recent survey found that almost nobody is happy about it. Insurance app company Jerry surveyed 1,300 drivers and found that 78 percent are either uncomfortable or extremely uncomfortable with their car’s maker collecting their data.


The vast majority – 96 percent – said that they should own and control the data their vehicle collect, but automakers have a different idea. That data, which can include location, driving habits, and other tidbits, can be used to sell subscriptions and tailor vehicle services to individual drivers. Studies have shown that automakers are “terrible at privacy and security,” however, and drivers are rightfully skeptical of how the information is being used.

General Motors got into trouble for working with a data broker to sell driver data to insurance companies, and most people are deeply uncomfortable with the idea that their data could be given to law enforcement without their consent or knowledge. Some even said they’d avoid taking sensitive trips in their vehicle if they felt that information could be sold and used.


Everything in our lives, from cell phones to connected refrigerators, collects data on us, so what’s the problem with giving up a little bit more? The number of ways automotive data could be used maliciously or to create corporate revenue streams is nearly endless, so this might be one area where it’s best to push back against data collection. That’s also before we get into data security and privacy issues, which automakers have shown are not their strong suits.

[Images: Tesla, General Motors, Mercedes-Benz]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 26 comments
  • THX1136 THX1136 on Jun 25, 2024

    Can't those who truly do not like this sort of surveillance take actions to limit or nearly stop all tracking? Asking for a friend.

    • See 1 previous
    • THX1136 THX1136 on Jun 25, 2024

      Straight-forward suggestion and I salute you for it!


  • Curt Curt on Jun 26, 2024

    Those of us with smartphones, and who doesn't have one these days, are giving up a veritable torrent of information to a huge number of data brokers, who sell and use that information in an incredible number of ways.


    That should be the issue, not the comparatively thin stream of data collected by our automobiles.


    But I guess when you're in automotive focused publication, you focus on what's in front of you.


    Not that I blindly want to share all of my automotive data with the world, there do need to be some constraints. I don't want the idea that my purchase or use of an automobile automatically opts me into sharing my data with whoever my service provider chooses to share it with.


    But the reality is we do that with our mobile phones and every app on it pretty much without a second thought.



    • Steve Biro Steve Biro on Jun 27, 2024

      I have location services turned off on all apps on my smartphone. One exception: I only use GPS occasionally and location services only works when that app is actively being used.




      I also have had Mazda turn off the TCU in the CX-5 that I just bought. And I use a VPN while on the web.


      It’s too late to stop all monitoring and it looks like our politicians aren’t going to step in on our behalf. But there are steps we can take to push back against, slow down and create huge gaps in the flow of our personal information.


  • Lou_BC How about mandatory driver's Ed for anyone under 100 years old? I'm all for mandatory retesting and recertification.
  • Burnbomber GM front driver A-bodies. They are the Chevy Celebrity, Pontiac 6000, Oldsmobile Ciera, and Buick Century (5th Generation). These are a derivative from the much maligned Chevrolet Citation, but they got this generation good. My 1st connection was in a daily 80 mile car pool,always riding in the back seat, in a stripper Pontiac 6000. It was a nice ride, quiet and roomy. Then I changed jobs and had a Chevy Celebrity as a company car. They were heavy duty strippers with a better than average GM feel (from F40 heavy-duty suspension option). I bought 2 ex-company cars at auction--one for my family and one for mother-in-law. They were extremely reliable, parts dirt cheap (especially in u-pulls), and simple to work on. It was the most reliable GM I've ever owned; better than my current Chevy Equinox, which will take a miracle to last as long as they did.
  • Slavuta Drivers in Bharat are better. Considering that rules are accepted as mere suggestions and a mix of car, bicycle, motorbike, pedestrian at the same place and time, these guys are virtuosos.
  • Grandmaster T Tesla Cybertruck?
  • Ava169189168 NO driver, at any age, should get a license without completing a Driver's Ed course.
Next