The Prius Prime's Sales Seem to Confirm Toyota's Worries About the Regular Prius

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Can a hybrid vehicle really shine when there’s a plug-in sibling hogging both the spotlight and the technological podium? For some automakers new to the game, time will tell. But at Toyota, which first made “hybrid” a household word, it seems the introduction of a new Prius variant has tentatively confirmed doubts about the viability of the stock Prius.

We’ll gain better perspective as 2017 plays out, but so far, it’s looking like the Prius Prime plug-in is doing well, and the Prius is maintaining the status quo. Which is to say, it’s not doing well.

The Prius Prime, first sold in the U.S. in November, adopts distinctive styling that sets it apart from its sibling, as well as a 8.8 kWh battery that provides 25 miles of all-electric driving range. Toyota unloaded 1,362 units in February and 1,366 in January, making the Prius Prime the second-best-selling plug-in (electric or hybrid) in the U.S. It will be interesting to see if these numbers take off come spring.

Toyota seems pretty pleased with its sales so far. California dealers are even asking for more Prius Prime volume, said Bill Fay, Toyota’s group vice president, in a recent interview with Wards Auto.

As for the Prius, its 2017 sales are significantly below the same period last year. The automaker sold 4,553 units in January and 5,418 in February. That’s well below the 6,102 and 7,169 seen in the same months in 2016, which saw an annual sales tally of 98,866 units — the lowest since 2004 and the end point of a marked decline that began after 2012.

The Prius faces the same problem faced by other conventional hybrid passenger cars, Basically, waning consumer interest in both the bodystyle and in an expensive technology that doesn’t offer an all-electric driving mode. These days, any new hybrid worth building had best be followed up with a plug-in variant. Take Hyundai’s Ioniq, for example, or Kia’s Niro.

Still, the introduction of a new Prius (for 2016) didn’t translate into renewed sales, and the downward trend shows no sign of ending. Even before the Prius Prime debuted, some at Toyota wondered if future improvements to the Prius would be worth it.

“Ultimately, PHEV may be the way to go,” said Shoichi Kaneko, assistant chief engineer for the Prius Prime, back in September.

The automaker certainly doesn’t seem to know what the future holds for the Prius. Fay pondered that a crossover-style Prius-badged vehicle could appeal to buyers, but wouldn’t make a promise. However, he stills hold out hope for a reversal of the Prius’ fortunes.

Toyota is “optimistic the consumer will find their way back” to the regular Prius, he said.

[Image: Toyota Motor Corporation]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • Da Coyote Da Coyote on Mar 23, 2017

    Toyota/Lexus has hired both Bangle and his son, right? Truly first rate engineering. Truly awful styling. Shame.

  • HotPotato HotPotato on Mar 27, 2017

    The Volt is better looking, quicker, and has twice the electric range. But the Prius Prime sells because it is a Toyota and the Volt is a Chevy, and some people's car knowledge extends no further than "my dad's crap Citation was his last American car; it's been all Japanese for us ever since."

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next